Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 685-713

  Iervolino, Iunio ^a,b   Cornell, C Allin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EARTHQUAKES; MODEL STRUCTURES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

NONLINEAR SEISMIC ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL HYPOTHESIS TEST;

SEISMOLOGY;

ACCELERATION; AMPLITUDE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; NONLINEARITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 24144475063     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1990199     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J., 1997. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 (1), 94-127.
2. Bazzurro, P., and Cornell, C. A., 1994a, Seismic hazard analysis of nonlinear structures. I: Methodology, J. Struct. Eng. 120, 3325-3344.
3. Bazzurro, P., and Cornell, C. A., 1994b, Seismic hazard analysis of nonlinear structures. II: Applications, J. Struct. Eng. 120, 3345-3365.
4. Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., 1970. Probability, Statistics and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, London.
5. Carballo Arévalo, J. E., 2000. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis: Spectrum Matching and Design, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (http://www.stanford.edu/group/rms/)
6. Foutch, D. A., and Shi, S., 2002. Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads, J. Constr. Steel Res. 58 (5-8).
7. Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H., 1999. Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures (SAC Task 5.4.3), Report No. 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
8. Iervolino, I., 2004. Record Selection for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Structures, M.Sc. thesis, ROSE School, Institute for Advanced Study, University of Pavia, Italy. (http://www.roseschool.it/files/ research-students-MD2004-iervolino.htm) http://www.roseschool.it/files/ research-students-MD2004-iervolino.htm
9. International Code Council, Inc. (ICC), 2000. International Building Code, Falls Church, VA.
10. Jalayer, F., 2003. Direct Probabilistic Seismic Analysis: Implementing Non-Linear Dynamic Assessments, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (http://www.stanford.edu/group/rms/)
11. Kennedy, R. P., Short, S. A., Mertz, K. L., Tokarz, F. J., Idriss, I. M., Power, M. S., and Sadigh, K., 1984. Engineering Characterization of Ground Motion - Task I: Effects of Characteristics of Free-Field Motion on Structural Response, NUREG/CR-3805 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
12. Luco, N., 2002. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis, SMRF Connection Fractures, and Near-Source Effect, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (http://www.stanford.edu/group/rms/)
13. Luco, N., and Cornell, C. A., 2000. Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands, J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1).
14. McGuire, R. K., 1995. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85 (5).
15. Medina, R. A., 2002. Seismic Demands for Nondeteriorating Frame Structures and their Dependence on Ground Motion. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
16. Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., and Shaikhutdinov, R. V., 2002. Investigation of Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables for the Van Nuys Testbed, PEER Report Series 2002/03, August.
17. Shome, N., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (http://www.stanford.edu/group/rms/)
18. Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. E., 1998. Earthquakes, records and nonlinear responses, Earthquake Spectra 14 (3), 469-500.
19. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2001. Technical Basis for Revision of Regulatory Guidance on Design Ground Motions: Hazard - and Risk-Consistent Ground Motion Spectra Guidelines, NUREG/CR-6728, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
20. Van Nuys Testbed Committee, 2002. PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology: Structural and Architectural Aspects, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley. (http://www.peertestbeds.net)