Actomyosin dynamics drive local membrane component organization in an in vitro active composite layer

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 12, 2016, Pages E1645-E1654

  Köster, Darius Vasco ^a   Husain, Kabir ^a   Iljazi, Elda ^a   Bhat, Abrar ^a   Bieling, Peter ^b,e   Mullins, R Dyche ^b   Rao, Madan ^a,c   Mayor, Satyajit ^a,d  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RAMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^d Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine   (India)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actin; Active mechanics; Membrane organization; Myosin II

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; F ACTIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MYOSIN II; 1,2-DIOLEOYL-SN-GLYCERO-3-PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE-N-(N-(5-AMINO-1-CARBOXYPENTYL(IMINODIACETIC ACID)SUCCINIMIDE)); 1,2-OLEOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHELATING AGENT; CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN; EZRIN; HYBRID PROTEIN; LIPID BILAYER; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NICKEL; NITRILOTRIACETIC ACID; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE; PHOTOPROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; YELLOW FLUORESCENT PROTEIN, BACTERIA;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SURFACE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; HYDRODYNAMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; LIPID BILAYER; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STEADY STATE; TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL POLARITY; CHICKEN; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; ACTOMYOSIN; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL POLARITY; CHELATING AGENTS; CHICKENS; CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; LIPID BILAYERS; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NICKEL; NITRILOTRIACETIC ACID; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINES; PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINES; PROTEIN BINDING; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84962302991     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514030113     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Singer SJ, Nicolson GL (1972) The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175(4023):720-731.
2. Morone N, et al. (2006) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the membrane skeleton at the plasma membrane interface by electron tomography. J Cell Biol 174(6): 851-862.
3. Charras GT, Hu C-K, Coughlin M, Mitchison TJ (2006) Reassembly of contractile actin cortex in cell blebs. J Cell Biol 175(3):477-490.
4. Li D, et al. (2015) ADVANCED IMAGING. Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics. Science 349(6251):aab3500.
5. Engelman DM (2005) Membranes are more mosaic than fluid. Nature 438(7068): 578-580.
6. Lingwood D, Simons K (2010) Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327(5961):46-50.
7. Kusumi A, et al. (2005) Paradigm shift of the plasma membrane concept from the two-dimensional continuum fluid to the partitioned fluid: High-speed single-molecule tracking of membrane molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 34: 351-378.
8. Jacobson K, Mouritsen OG, Anderson RGW (2007) Lipid rafts: At a crossroad between cell biology and physics. Nat Cell Biol 9(1):7-14.
9. Arumugam S, Bassereau P (2015) Membrane nanodomains: Contribution of curvature and interaction with proteins and cytoskeleton. Essays Biochem 57:109-119.
10. Sharma P, et al. (2004) Nanoscale organization of multiple GPI-anchored proteins in living cell membranes. Cell 116(4):577-589.
11. Goswami D, et al. (2008) Nanoclusters of GPI-anchored proteins are formed by cortical actin-driven activity. Cell 135(6):1085-1097.
12. van Zanten TS, et al. (2009) Hotspots of GPI-anchored proteins and integrin nanoclusters function as nucleation sites for cell adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(44): 18557-18562.
13. Saha S, et al. (2015) Diffusion of GPI-anchored proteins is influenced by the activity of dynamic cortical actin. Mol Biol Cell 26(22):4033-4045.
14. Plowman SJ, Muncke C, Parton RG, Hancock JF (2005) H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(43):15500-15505.
15. Gowrishankar K, et al. (2012) Active remodeling of cortical actin regulates spatiotemporal organization of cell surface molecules. Cell 149(6):1353-1367.
16. Jaqaman K, et al. (2011) Cytoskeletal control of CD36 diffusion promotes its receptor and signaling function. Cell 146(4):593-606.
17. Tian T, Plowman SJ, Parton RG, Kloog Y, Hancock JF (2010) Mathematical modeling of K-Ras nanocluster formation on the plasma membrane. Biophys J 99(2):534-543.
18. Pollard TD, Blanchoin L, Mullins RD (2000) Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29:545-576.
19. Fritzsche M, Lewalle A, Duke T, Kruse K, Charras G (2013) Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex. Mol Biol Cell 24(6):757-767.
20. Bezanilla M, Gladfelter AS, Kovar DR, Lee W-L (2015) Cytoskeletal dynamics: A view from the membrane. J Cell Biol 209(3):329-337.
21. Bovellan M, et al. (2014) Cellular control of cortical actin nucleation. Curr Biol 24(14): 1628-1635.
22. Clark AG, Wartlick O, Salbreux G, Paluch EK (2014) Stresses at the cell surface during animal cell morphogenesis. Curr Biol 24(10):R484-R494.
23. Yumura S, et al. (2013) Cell-scale dynamic recycling and cortical flow of the actinmyosin cytoskeleton for rapid cell migration. Biol Open 2(2):200-209.
24. Luo W, et al. (2013) Analysis of the local organization and dynamics of cellular actin networks. J Cell Biol 202(7):1057-1073.
25. Biro M, et al. (2013) Cell cortex composition and homeostasis resolved by integrating proteomics and quantitative imaging. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 70(11):741-754.
26. Goehring NW, et al. (2011) Polarization of PAR proteins by advective triggering of a pattern-forming system. Science 334(6059):1137-1141.
27. Yi J, Wu XS, Crites T, Hammer JA, 3rd (2012) Actin retrograde flow and actomyosin II arc contraction drive receptor cluster dynamics at the immunological synapse in Jurkat T cells. Mol Biol Cell 23(5):834-852.
28. Kaizuka Y, Douglass AD, Varma R, Dustin ML, Vale RD (2007) Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(51):20296-20301.
29. Treanor B, et al. (2010) The membrane skeleton controls diffusion dynamics and signaling through the B cell receptor. Immunity 32(2):187-199.
30. Paul AS, Pollard TD (2009) Review of the mechanism of processive actin filament elongation by formins. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66(8):606-617.
31. Beach JR, et al. (2014) Nonmuscle myosin II isoforms coassemble in living cells. Curr Biol 24(10):1160-1166.
32. Paluch E, Piel M, Prost J, Bornens M, Sykes C (2005) Cortical actomyosin breakage triggers shape oscillations in cells and cell fragments. Biophys J 89(1):724-733.
33. Rao M, Mayor S (2014) Active organization of membrane constituents in living cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 29:126-132.
34. Nédélec FJ, Surrey T, Maggs AC, Leibler S (1997) Self-organization of microtubules and motors. Nature 389(6648):305-308.
35. Murrell MP, Gardel ML (2012) F-actin buckling coordinates contractility and severing in a biomimetic actomyosin cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(51): 20820-20825.
36. Vogel SK, Heinemann F, Chwastek G, Schwille P (2013) The design of MACs (minimal actin cortices). Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 70(11):706-717.
37. Ideses Y, Sonn-Segev A, Roichman Y, Bernheim-Groswasser A (2013) Myosin II does it all: Assembly, remodeling, and disassembly of actin networks are governed by myosin II activity. Soft Matter 9(29):7127-7138.
38. Keber FC, et al. (2014) Topology and dynamics of active nematic vesicles. Science 345(6201):1135-1139.
39. Sanchez T, Chen DTN, DeCamp SJ, Heymann M, Dogic Z (2012) Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter. Nature 491(7424):431-434.
40. Liu AP, Fletcher DA (2006) Actin polymerization serves as a membrane domain switch in model lipid bilayers. Biophys J 91(11):4064-4070.
41. Heinemann F, Vogel SK, Schwille P (2013) Lateral membrane diffusion modulated by a minimal actin cortex. Biophys J 104(7):1465-1475.
42. Honigmann A, et al. (2014) A lipid bound actin meshwork organizes liquid phase separation in model membranes. eLife 3:e01671.
43. Arumugam S, Petrov EP, Schwille P (2015) Cytoskeletal pinning controls phase separation in multicomponent lipid membranes. Biophys J 108(5):1104-1113.
44. Delatour V, et al. (2008) Arp2/3 controls the motile behavior of N-WASP-functionalized GUVs and modulates N-WASP surface distribution by mediating transient links with actin filaments. Biophys J 94(12):4890-4905.
45. Giardini PA, Fletcher DA, Theriot JA (2003) Compression forces generated by actin comet tails on lipid vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(11):6493-6498.
46. Upadhyaya A, Chabot JR, Andreeva A, Samadani A, van Oudenaarden A (2003) Probing polymerization forces by using actin-propelled lipid vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(8):4521-4526.
47. Stuhrmann B, Soares E Silva M, Depken M, Mackintosh FC, Koenderink GH (2012) Nonequilibrium fluctuations of a remodeling in vitro cytoskeleton. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 86(2 Pt 1):020901.
48. Saleh HS, et al. (2009) Properties of an ezrin mutant defective in F-actin binding. J Mol Biol 385(4):1015-1031.
49. Shrivastava R, Köster D, Kalme S, Mayor S, NeerathilingamM(2015) Tailor-made ezrin actin binding domain to probe its interaction with actin in-vitro. PLoS One 10(4): e0123428.
50. Lenne P-F, et al. (2006) Dynamic molecular confinement in the plasma membrane by microdomains and the cytoskeleton meshwork. EMBO J 25(14): 3245-3256.
51. Craig R, Woodhead JL (2006) Structure and function of myosin filaments. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16(2):204-212.
52. Kruse K, Jülicher F (2000) Actively contracting bundles of polar filaments. Phys Rev Lett 85(8):1778-1781.
53. Murrell M, Gardel ML (2014) Actomyosin sliding is attenuated in contractile biomimetic cortices. Mol Biol Cell 25(12):1845-1853.
54. Smith D, et al. (2007) Molecular motor-induced instabilities and cross linkers determine biopolymer organization. Biophys J 93(12):4445-4452.
55. Nicotera P, Leist M, Ferrando-May E (1998) Intracellular ATP, a switch in the decision between apoptosis and necrosis. Toxicol Lett 102-103(8):139-142.
56. Marchetti MC, et al. (2013) Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Rev Mod Phys 85(3): 1143-1189.
57. Ngo S, et al. (2014) Large-scale chaos and fluctuations in active nematics. Phys Rev Lett 113(3):038302.
58. Veatch SL, Polozov IV, Gawrisch K, Keller SL (2004) Liquid domains in vesicles investigated by NMR and fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 86(5):2910-2922.
59. Alvarado J, Sheinman M, Sharma A, MacKintosh FC, Koenderink GH (2013) Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state. Nat Phys 9(7):1-7.
60. Raghupathy R, et al. (2015) Transbilayer lipid interactions mediate nanoclustering of lipid-anchored proteins. Cell 161(3):581-594.
61. Kaizuka Y, Groves JT (2004) Structure and dynamics of supported intermembrane junctions. Biophys J 86(2):905-912.
62. Kaizuka Y, Groves JT (2010) Bending-mediated superstructural organizations in phase-separated lipid membranes. New J Phys 12(2010):095001.
63. Das A, Polley A, Rao M (2015) Phase Segregation of Passive Advective Particles in an Active Medium. arXiv:1506.06928v2.
64. Chen B, et al. (2014) The WAVE regulatory complex links diverse receptors to the actin cytoskeleton. Cell 156(1-2):195-207.
65. Neisch AL, Fehon RG (2011) Ezrin, Radixin and Moesin: Key regulators of membranecortex interactions and signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23(4):377-382.
66. Chaudhuri A, Bhattacharya B, Gowrishankar K, Mayor S, Rao M(2011) Spatiotemporal regulation of chemical reactions by active cytoskeletal remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(36):14825-14830.
67. Iyengar G, Rao M (2014) A cellular solution to an information-processing problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(34):12402-12407.
68. Surrey T, Nedelec F, Leibler S, Karsenti E (2001) Physical properties determining selforganization of motors and microtubules. Science 292(5519):1167-1171.
69. Spudich JA, Watt S (1971) The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem 246(15):4866-4871.
70. Pollard TD (1982) Myosin purification and characterization. Methods Cell Biol 24: 333-371.
71. Pollard TD (1982) Structure and polymerization of Acanthamoeba myosin-II filaments. J Cell Biol 95(3):816-825.
72. Pollock N, Koonce MP, de Hostos EL, Vale RD (1998) In vitro microtubule-based organelle transport in wild-type Dictyostelium and cells overexpressing a truncated dynein heavy chain. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 40(3):304-314.
73. York AG, et al. (2013) Instant super-resolution imaging in live cells and embryos via analog image processing. Nat Methods 10(11):1122-1126.
74. Axelrod D, Koppel DE, Schlessinger J, Elson E, Webb WW (1976) Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J 16(9): 1055-1069.
75. Rezakhaniha R, et al. (2012) Experimental investigation of collagen waviness and orientation in the arterial adventitia using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11(3-4):461-473.
76. Thielicke W, Stamhuis EJ (2014) PIVlab - Towards User-friendly, Affordable and Accurate Digital Particle Image Velocimetry in MATLAB. J Open Res Softw 2:1-10.