Navigated Breast Tumor Excision Using Electromagnetically Tracked Ultrasound and Surgical Instruments

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 600-606

  Ungi, Tamas ^a   Gauvin, Gabrielle ^a   Lasso, Andras ^a   Yeo, Caitlin T ^a   Pezeshki, Padina ^a   Vaughan, Thomas ^a   Carter, Kaci ^a   Rudan, John ^a   Engel, C Jay ^a   Fichtinger, Gabor ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Image guidance; Sonography; Surgical oncology

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TUMORS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; USER INTERFACES;

CLINICAL ENVIRONMENTS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER; IMAGE GUIDANCES; INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND; LOCALIZATION PROCEDURE; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS;

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CAUTERIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; NEEDLE; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE ECHOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; SENSOR; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGING PHANTOM; PROCEDURES;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84962052800     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2466591     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. B. Fisher et al., "Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer," N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 347, no. 16, pp. 1233-1241, 2002.
2. E. S.Hwang, "Breast conservation: Is the survival better formastectomy?" J. Surg. Oncol., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 58-61, Jul. 2014.
3. S. Agarwal et al., "Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer," JAMA Surg., vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 267-274, Mar 2014.
4. J. F. Waljee et al., "Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer," Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1297-1303, 2008.
5. M.Rizzo et al., "The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload," Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 228-234, 2010.
6. P. Ananthakrishnan et al., "Optimizing surgical margins in breast conservation," Int. J. Surg. Oncol., vol. 2012, art. no. 585670 (9 pages), 2012.
7. E. Tummel et al., "The CUBE technique: Continuous ultrasound-guided breast excision," Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 3354-3355, 2014.
8. H. Pan et al., "Intraoperative ultrasound guidance is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for breast cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis," PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, p. e74028, 2013.
9. S. Qureshi et al., "Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging modalities in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review," J. Amer. Acad. Orthop. Surg., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 800-809, 2014.
10. P. Grunert et al., "Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery," Neurosurg. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 73-99, 2003.
11. M. Tomikawa et al., "Real-time 3-dimensional virtual reality navigation system with openMRI for breast-conserving surgery," J. Amer.Coll. Surg., vol. 210, no. 6, pp. 927-933, 2010.
12. A. Lasso et al., "PLUS: Open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2527-2537, Oct. 2014.
13. A. Fedorov et al., "3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network," Magn. Reson. Imag., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1323-1341, 2012.
14. D. Zorin et al., "Interpolating subdivisions formesheswith arbitrary topology," in Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, Comput. Graph., Annu. Conf. Ser., 1996, pp. 189-192.
15. A. Samani et al., "Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 2183-2198, 2003.
16. T. P. Olson et al., "Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence," Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 2953-2960, 2007.
17. F. Schnabel et al., "Arandomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies," Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1589-1595, 2014.
18. J. W. Jakub et al., "Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions," Amer. J. Surg., vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 522-528, 2010.
19. M. Abe et al., "Magnetic resonance imaging-guided navigation with a thermoplastic shell for breast-conserving surgery," Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 950-955, 2011.
20. G. Srimathveeravalli et al., "A study of porcine liver motion during respiration for improving targeting in image-guided needle placements," Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15-27, 2013.
21. Z.Yaniv et al., "Needle-based interventions with the image-guided surgery toolkit (IGSTK): From phantoms to clinical trials," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 922-933, Apr. 2010.
22. H. Zhang et al., "Two-stage registration for real-time deformable compensation using an electromagnetic tracking device," Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assisted Interv., vol. 8, no. Pt 2, pp. 992-999, 2005.
23. L. Maier-Hein et al., "In vivo accuracy assessment of a needle-based navigation system for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the liver," Med. Phys., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 5385-5396, 2008.
24. O. Shahin et al., "Ultrasound-based tumormovement compensation during navigated laparoscopic liver interventions," Surg. Endosc., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1734-1741, 2014.
25. P. J. Stolka et al., "A 3D-elastography-guided system for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies," Proc. SPIE Med. Imag., vol. 7625, pp. 76251I-1-76251I-12, 2010.
26. J. Huber et al., "Navigated renal access using electromagnetic tracking: An initial experience," Surg. Endosc., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1307-1312, Apr. 2011.
27. C. Arentz et al., "Ten-year experience with hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy," Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 378-383, 2010.
28. M. A. McMahon et al., "Does the insertion of a gel-based marker at stereotactic breast biopsy allow subsequent wire localizations to be carried out under ultrasound guidance?" Clin. Radiol., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 840-844, 2011.
29. J. W. Jeong et al., "Differentiation of cancerous lesions in excised human breast specimens using multiband attenuation profiles from ultrasonic transmission tomography," J. Ultrasound Med., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 435-451, 2008.
30. Y. Qi et al., "Electromagnetic tracking performance analysis and optimization," in Proc. IEEE 36th Annu. Int. Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Aug. 2014, pp. 6534-6538.
31. V. Harish et al., "Intraoperative visualization and assessment of electromagnetic tracking error," in Proc. SPIE, Med. Imag., Image-Guided Procedures, Robot. Interventions, Model., Mar. 18 2015, vol. 9415, art. no. 94152H.