A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of marginprobe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1589-1595

  Schnabel, Freya ^a   Boolbol, Susan K ^b   Gittleman, Mark ^c   Karni, Tami ^d   Tafra, Lorraine ^e   Feldman, Sheldon ^f   Police, Alice ^c   Friedman, Neil B ^g   Karlan, Scott ^h   Holmes, Dennis ⁱ   Willey, Shawna C ^j   Carmon, Moshe ^k   Fernandez, Kristen ^c   Akbari, Stephanie ^l   Harness, Jay ^m   Guerra, Lisa ⁿ   Frazier, Thomas ^o   Lane, Karen ^p   Simmons, Rache M ^q   Estabrook, Alison ^c   Allweis, Tanir ^r   more..

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Department of Surgery Breast Care Specialists ^*  (United States)

^d ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^e ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Department of Medicine   (United States)

^g MERCY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^l VIRGINIA HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^m ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁿ Hoag Hospital   (United States)

^o BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^q WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^r HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARGINPROBE DEVICE; MEDICAL DEVICE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; DEVICES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; TUMOR INVASION;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84898902715     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3602-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus statement: treatment of early-stage breast cancer 18-21 June 1990;8(6):1-19. http://consensus.nih.gov/ 1990/1990earlystagebreastcancer081html.htm. Accessed 1 Sept 2013.
2. McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowes EJ, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467-75.
3. Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78:1921-8. (Pubitemid 26360575)
4. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3219-32.
5. Dunne C, Burke JP, Morrow M, Kell MR. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1615-20.
6. Lupe K, Truong PT, Alexander C, et al. Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e561-8.
7. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, re-excision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81-5. (Pubitemid 30204505)
8. Mulleniz PS, Cuadrado DG, Steele SR, et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg. 2004;187:643-6. (Pubitemid 38596888)
9. Thill M. MarginProbe: intraoperative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery by using radiofrequency spectroscopy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10:301-15.
10. Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, et al. Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res. 2010;160:277-81.
11. Allweiss TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196:483-9.
12. Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J, et al. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:608-13.
13. Taghian A, Jagsi R, Makris A, et al. Results of a survey regarding irradiation of internal mammary chain in patients with breast cancer: practiceis culture driven rather than evidence based. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:706-14. (Pubitemid 39311749)
14. Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22-8. (Pubitemid 43073515)
15. Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.
16. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of re-excision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:331-7. (Pubitemid 43989977)
17. Heil J, Breitkreuz K, Golatta M, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breast conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:541-7.
18. Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, et al. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg. 2008;196:556-8.
19. Mook J, Klein R, Kobbermann A, et al. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:886-91.
20. Coopey SB, Buckley JM, Smith BL, et al. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3036-40.
21. Vaidya JS, Joseph DJ, Tobias JS, et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): An international, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;376:91-102.
22. Haloua MH, Krekel NM, Winters HA. A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects. Ann Surg. 2013;257:609-20.