An analytic hierarchy process model to evaluate road section design

Transport

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 312-321

  Barić, Danijela ^a   Pilko, Hrvoje ^a   Strujić, Josip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process; intersection; multi criteria decision making; road section design; roundabouts; sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INTERSECTIONS; ROADS AND STREETS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CIRCULATORY SYSTEMS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC OPTIMISATION; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; ROAD SECTION; ROUNDABOUTS;

HIGHWAY PLANNING;

EID: 84961941193     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2016.1157830     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. F.Abastante, ; M.Bottero, ; I.M.Lami, 2012. Using the analytic network process for addressing a transport decision problem, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 4(1):41–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i1.119
2. M.H.Aghdaie, ; S.Hashemkhani Zolfani, ; E.K.Zavadskas, 2012. Prioritizing constructing projects of municipalities based on AHP and COPRAS-G:a case study about footbridges in Iran, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 7(2):145–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2012.20
3. T.Arslan, 2009. A hybrid model of fuzzy and AHP for handling public assessments on transportation projects, Transportation 36(1):97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9181-9
4. E.Avineri, ; J.Prashker, ; A.Ceder, 2000. Transportation projects selection process using fuzzy sets theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 116(1):35–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00036-6
5. D.Barić, ; D.Čerepić, ; Ž.Radačić,. 2007. Implementation of relevant methods in assessing traffic-technological projects, Promet – Traffic&Transportation 19(5):329–336.
6. D.Barić, ; M.Starčević, 2015. Implementation of analytic hierarchy process in solving transport problems, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 7(2):295–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v7i2.251
7. I.Barišić, 2014. Urbanistički parametri pri planiranju kružnih raskrižja:doktorska disertacija. Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. 206 s. (in Croatian).
8. O.Basile, ; L.Persia, ; D.S.Usami, 2010. A methodology to assess pedestrian crossing safety, European Transport Research Review 2(3):129–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-010-0036-z
9. J.Bendeković, 2008. Analiza i struktura investicijskih projekata, Računovodstvo, revizija i financije 18(4):76–82 (in Croatian).
10. I.Bošnjak, ; Z.Kavran, ; D.Matijević, 2005. Design of delivery areas of public postal operator by applying AHP model, Promet – Traffic&Transportation 17(2):77–85.
11. M.Bottero, ; V.Ferretti, ; S.Pomarico, 2012. Assessing the sustainability of alternative transport infrastructures, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 4(1):61–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i1.101
12. V.B.G.Campos, ; R.A.R.Ramos, 2009. Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas, Journal of Advanced Transportation 43(4):371–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670430403
13. A.Cerić, ; D.Marčić, ; M.S.Kovačević, 2013. Applying the analytic network process for risk assessment in sustainable ground improvement, Građevinar 65(10):919–929.
14. A.Cerić, ; T.Marić, 2011. Determining priorities for managing risk on construction projects, Građevinar 63(3):265–271.
15. M.-C.Chung, ; C.-H.Wei, ; C.-J.Chen, 2009. Hierarchical evaluation scheme on technology sourcing for advanced public transport systems, Journal of Advanced Transportation 43(1):89–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670430106
16. A.Deluka-Tibljaš, ; B.Karleuša, ; Č.Benac,. 2011. AHP methodology application in garage-parking facility location selection, Promet – Traffic&Transportation 23(4):303–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v23i4.133
17. D.Đelović, ; D.Medenica Mitrović, 2010. An approach to the selection of optimal transformation strategy in seaports, Promet – Traffic&Transportation 22(3):219–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v22i3.278
18. T.E.Erkan, ; G.F.Can, 2014. Selecting the best warehouse data collecting system by using AHP and FAHP methods, Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette 21(1):87–93.
19. J.Farhan, ; T.Fwa, 2009. Pavement maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process, Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2093:12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2093-02
20. M.M.Fouladgar, ; A.Yazdani-Chamzini, ; A.Lashgari, ; E.K.Zavadskas, ; Z.Turskis, 2012. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 16(1):85–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.666657
21. M.H.Gholami, ; M.Seyyed-Esfahani, 2012. An integrated framework for competitive market strategy selection by using fuzzy AHP, Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette 19(4):769–780.
22. F.Haghighat, 2011. Application of a multi-criteria approach to road safety evaluation in the Bushehr province, Iran, Promet – Traffic & Transportation 23(5):341–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v23i5.152
23. S.Hashemkhani Zolfani, ; I.-S.Chen, ; N.Rezaeiniya, ; J.Tamošaitienė, 2012. A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3):529–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.709472
24. J.Holguín-Veras, 1995. Comparative assessment of AHP and MAV in highway planning:case study, Journal of Transportation Engineering 121(2):191–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:2(191)
25. M.Jakimavičius, ; M.Burinskienė, 2009. Assessment of Vilnius city development scenarios based on transport system modelling and multicriteria analysis, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(4):361–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.361-368
26. B.Karleuša, ; N.Ožanić, ; A.Deluka-Tibljaš, 2014. Improving decision making in defining priorities for implementation of irrigation plans using AHP methodology, Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette 21(3):673–680.
27. P.Klungboonkrong, ; M.A.P.Taylor, 1999. An integrated planning tool for evaluating road environmental impacts, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 14(5):335–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00152
28. I.Legac, 2008. Raskrižja javnih cesta cestovne prometnice II. Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. 205 s. (in Croatian).
29. 3), Automation in Construction 17(2):180–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.004
30. E.López, ; A.Monzón, 2010. Integration of sustainability issues in strategic transportation planning:a multi-criteria model for the assessment of transport infrastructure plans, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 25(6):440–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00652.x
31. R.Mauro, ; M.Cattani, 2012. Functional and economic evaluations for choosing road intersection layout, Promet –Traffic & Transportation 24(5):441–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v24i5.1180
32. F.Mehmood, ; M.Hassannezhad, ; T.Abbas, 2014. Analytical investigation of mobile NFC adaption with SWOT-AHP approach:a case of Italian telecom, Procedia Technology 12:535–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.526
33. D.Moazami, ; H.Behbahani, ; R.Muniandy, 2011. Pavement rehabilitation and maintenance prioritization of urban roads using fuzzy logic, Expert Systems with Applications 38(10):12869–12879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.079
34. M.S.Monajjem, ; M.H.Jalal Kamali, ; M.S.Ayubirad, 2013. Studying the effect of spiral curves and intersection angle, on the accident ratios in two-lane rural highways in Iran, Promet – Traffic&Transportation 25(4):343–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v25i4.332
35. M.Nowak, 2005. Investment projects evaluation by simulation and multiple criteria decision aiding procedure, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 11(3):193–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13923730.2005.9636350
36. H.Pilko, 2014. Optimiziranje oblikovne i sigurnosne komponente raskrižja s kružnim tokom prometa:doktorska disertacija. Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. 194 s. (in Croatian).
37. H.Pilko, ; D.Brčić, ; N.Šubić, 2014. Study of vehicle speed in the design of roundabouts, Građevinar 66(5):407–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.14256/JCE.887.2013
38. V.Podvezko, 2009. Application of AHP technique, Journal of Business Economics and Management 10(2):181–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.181-189
39. T.Poletan Jugović, ; A.Jugović, ; R.Zelenika, 2007. Multicriteria optimisation in logistics forwarder activities, Promet – Traffic&Transportation 19(3):145–153.
40. R.Rossi, ; M.Gastaldi, ; G.Gecchele, 2013. Comparison of fuzzy-based and AHP methods in sustainability evaluation:a case of traffic pollution-reducing policies, European Transport Research Review 5(1):11–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-012-0086-5
41. B.D.Rouyendegh, ; T.E.Erkan, 2012. Selection of academic staff using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP):a pilot study, Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette 19(4):923–929.
42. T.L.Saaty, 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1):83–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
43. T.L.Saaty, 1995. Transport planning with multiple criteria:the analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review, Journal of Advanced Transportation 29(1):81–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670290109
44. H.Sivilevičius, ; L.Maskeliūnaitė, 2010. The criteria for identifying the quality of passengers’ transportation by railway and their ranking using AHP method, Transport 25(4):368–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.46
45. J.Strujić, 2014. Vrednovanje mogućih rješenja rekonstrukcije državne ceste D8 na dionici od Poljičke ceste do ulice Put Starog sela primjenom AHP metode:magisterska rabota. Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. (in Croatian).
46. C.-W.Su, ; M.-Y.Cheng, ; F.-B.Lin, 2006. Simulation‐enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(4):285–291.
47. L.Sun, ; W.Gu, 2011. Pavement condition assessment using fuzzy logic theory and analytic hierarchy process, Journal of Transportation Engineering 137(9):648–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000239
48. S.Šurdonja, ; A.Deluka-Tibljaš, ; S.Babić, 2013. Optimization of roundabout design elements, Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette 20(3):533–539.
49. M.T.Tabucanon, ; H.-M.Lee, 1995. Multiple criteria evaluation of transportation system improvement projects:the case of Korea, Journal of Advanced Transportation 29(1):127–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670290110
50. J.-Y.Teng, ; W.-C.Huang, ; M.-C.Lin, 2010. Systematic budget allocation for transportation construction projects:a case in Taiwan, Transportation 37(2):331–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9239-3
51. L.-A.Vidal, ; F.Marle, ; J.-C.Bocquet, 2011. Using a Delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects, Expert Systems with Applications 38(5):5388–5405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.016
52. R.Vreeker, ; P.Nijkamp, ; C.Ter Welle, 2002. A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans, Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment 7(1):27–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00005-9
53. W.-C.Wang, ; W.-D.Yu, ; I.-T.Yang, ; C.-C.Lin, ; M.-T.Lee; Y.-Y.Cheng, 2013. Applying the AHP to support the bestvalue contractor selection – lessons learned from two case studies in Taiwan, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(1):24–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.734851
54. M.Wiethoff, ; K.Brookhuis, ; D.De Waard, ; V.Marchau, ; L.Walta, ; G.Wenzel, ; K.De Brucker, ; C.Macharis, 2012. A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and invehicle technology combinations, European Transport Research Review 4(2):67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0065-2
55. Z.Wu, ; G.Flintsch, ; T.Chowdhury, 2008. Hybrid multiobjective optimization model for regional pavement-preservation resource allocation, Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2084:28–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2084-04
56. S.Yedla, ; R.M.Shrestha, 2003. Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi, Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice 37(8):717–729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00027-2
57. J.Yu, ; Y.Liu, ; G.-L.Chang, ; W.Ma, ; X.Yang, 2011. Locating urban transit hubs:multicriteria model and case study in China, Journal of Transportation Engineering 137(12):944–952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000275