Hierarchical evaluation scheme on technology sourcing for advanced public transport systems

Journal of Advanced Transportation

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 89-111

  Chung, Ming Chih ^a   Wei, Chien Hung ^b   Chen, Chung Jen ^c  

^a SOUTHERN TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Advanced public transport systems; Analytic hierarchy process; Company policy; Smart card; Survey techniques

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ECONOMICS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; SMART CARDS; SURVEYS; TRANSPORTATION;

ADVANCED PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM; COMPANY POLICIES; EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGY; EVALUATION PROBLEMS; HIERARCHICAL EVALUATION; INTEGRATED EVALUATION; SURVEY TECHNIQUES; TECHNOLOGY SOURCING;

ADVANCED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 58049169390     PISSN: 01976729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/atr.5670430106     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beard, C., Easingwood, C. 1996. New Product Launch. Industrial Marketing Management 25(2): 87-103.
2. Bloom, N., Griffith, R. 2001. The Internationalisation of UK R&D. Fiscal Studies 22(3): 337-342.
3. Braunschweig, T., Becker, B. 2004. Choosing Research Priorities by Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. R&D Management 34(1): 77-86.
4. Chang, Y. H., Chen, H. H. 1998. Comparison of the Fuzzy Theory and Grey Decision Method. Transportation Planning Journal 27(4): 637-668.
5. Chatterji, D. 1996. Accessing External Sources of Technology. Research Technology Management 39(2): 48-56.
6. Chen, C. J., Huang, C. C. 2004. A Multiple Criteria Evaluation of High-Tech Industries for the Science-Based Industrial Park in Taiwan. Information & Management 41(7): 839-851.
7. Chen, D. J. 2003. Analysis on the Development of Supplied Technique of Intelligent Transportation System in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Transportation 15(4): 329-356.
8. Co, C. Y. 2000. R&D, Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Sourcing? Review of Industrial Organization 16(4): 385-397.
9. Deng, J. L. 1992. Grey System Fundamental Method. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
10. Hemmert, M. 2004. The Impact of Internationalization on the Technology Sourcing Performance of High-Tech Business Units. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 21 (3): 149-174.
11. Hughes, W. R. 1990. A Note on Consistency in Utility Assessment. Decision Science 21(4): 882-887.
12. Huisman, K. J. M., Kort, P. M. 2004. Strategic Technology Adoption Taking Into Account Future Technological Improvements. European Journal of Operational Research 159(3): 705-728.
13. Hummel, M. et al. 2002. Product Design Planning With the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Inter-Organizational Networks. R&D Management 32(5): 451-468.
14. Institute of Transportation. 1995. The Feasibility Study of Applying Smart Card to Enhance the Technology and Efficiency of Transportation Systems in Taiwan Area. Taipei, Taiwan.
15. Kengpol, A., O'Brien, C. 2001. The Development of a Decision Support Tool for the Selection of Advanced Technology to Achieve Rapid Product Development. International Journal of Production Economics 69(2): 177-191.
16. Kilic, F. 2002. Development of A Low Cost, High-Durability Electronic Fare Collection System in Istanbul, Turkey. Proceedings of the 9th Annual World Congress on ITS.
17. Lu, S. S., Yu, J. K. 2002. Study of the Impact Factors of Hillside Construction Projects. Journal of Architecture 39: 71-86.
18. Malik, K. 2002. Aiding the Technology Manager. Technovation 22(7): 427-436.
19. Ministry of Transportation and Communications. 2004. The Master Plan of Intelligent Transportation Systems in Taiwan: The 2004 Edition. Taipei, Taiwan.
20. Moore, II, J. E. et al. 2002. Performance of Automatic Passenger Counters in the Ventura/Lompoc Smart Card Demonstration Project. ITS Journal!: 131-150.
21. Moore, II, J. E., Giuliano, G 1998. Functional Evaluation of the Los Angeles Smart Card Field Operational Test. Transportation Research Part C 6(4): 247-270.
22. National Science Council. 2003. Yearbook of Science and Technology. Taipei, Taiwan.
23. Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., Woo, C. Y. 2003. Technology Sourcing and Output of Established Firms in a Regime of Encompassing Technological Change. Strategic Management Journal 24(7): 651-659.
24. Rodier, C. J. et al. 1998. Evaluation of Advanced Transit Alternatives Using Consumer Welfare. Transportation Research Part C 6(1-2): 141-156.
25. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. 1991. The Logic of Priorities. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
26. Saaty, T. L., Kearns, K. P. 1985. Analytical Planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
27. Shih, N. Y. 2001. The Study of Teacher Evaluation Using Grey Statistics. Journal of Chung Chou 14: 81-96.
28. Steensma, H. K., Corley, K. G. 2001. Organizational Context as a Moderator of Theories on Firm Boundaries for Technology Sourcing. Academy of Management Journal 44(2): 271-292.
29. Steensma, H. K., Corley, K. G. 2000. On the Performance of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships. Academy of Management Journal 43(6): 1045-1068.
30. Tsao, C., Hu, W. I. 1993. Grey System Theory and Methods. Northeast Forestry University Press, China.
31. Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G, Noorderhaven, N. 2002. External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions. Organization Science 13(6): 714-734.
32. Winebrake, J. J., Creswick, B. P. 2003. The Future of Hydrogen Fueling Systems for Transportation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70(4): 359-384.