Potential of using cerium oxide nanoparticles for protecting healthy tissue during accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)

Physica Medica

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 631-635

  Ouyang, Zi ^a   Mainali, Madan Kumar ^b   Sinha, Neeharika ^c   Strack, Guinevere ^a   Altundal, Yucel ^a   Hao, Yao ^a   Winningham, Thomas Andrew ^d   Sajo, Erno ^a   Celli, Jonathan ^b   Ngwa, Wilfred ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d Space Coast Cancer Center ^*  (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

APBI; Cerium oxide; Radiolysis; Radioprotectant

Indexed keywords

CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; HYDROXYL RADICAL; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; CERIC OXIDE; CERIUM; NANOPARTICLE; RADIOPROTECTIVE AGENT;

ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MATERIAL COATING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL TISSUE PROTECTION; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOTON; PROTECTION; RADIATION APPLICATOR; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOLYSIS; RADIOTHERAPY UNIT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING SYSTEM;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CERIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NANOPARTICLES; RADIATION-PROTECTIVE AGENTS; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES;

EID: 84961904765     PISSN: 11201797     EISSN: 1724191X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Howlader N., Noone A., Krapcho M, Garshell J., Miller D., Altekruse S. Cancer statistics review (CSR) 1975-2012 2015, National Cancer Institute.
2. Njeh CF, Saunders M.W., Langton C.M. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): a review of available techniques. Radiat Oncol (London, England) 2010, 5-90.
3. Hall E.J., Giaccia A.J. Radiobiology for the radiologist 2012, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
4. 2 production under ionizing radiation. Water 2011, 3:235.
5. Beckman K.B., Ames B.N. The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol Rev 1998, 78:547-581.
6. Marchioli R., Schweiger C., Levantesi G., Tavazzi L., Valagussa F. Antioxidant vitamins and prevention of cardiovascular disease: epidemiological and clinical trial data. Lipids 2001, 36(Suppl):S53-S63.
7. Ngwa W., Kumar R., Sridhar S., Korideck H., Zygmanski P., Cormack R.A. Targeted radiotherapy with gold nanoparticles: current status and future perspectives. Nanomedicine (London, England) 2014, 9:1063-1082.
8. Wason M.S., Colon J., Das S., Seal S., Turkson J., Zhao J., et al. Sensitization of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation by cerium oxide nanoparticle-induced ROS production. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2013, 9:558-569.
9. Celardo I., De Nicola M., Mandoli C., Pedersen J.Z., Traversa E., Ghibelli L. Ce(3)+ ions determine redox-dependent anti-apoptotic effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5:4537-4549.
10. Xue Y., Luan Q., Yang D., Yao X., Zhou K. Direct evidence for hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115:4433-4438.
11. Mullins D.R. The surface chemistry of cerium oxide. Surf Sci Rep 2015, 70:42-85.
12. Tarnuzzer R.W., Colon J., Patil S., Seal S. Vacancy engineered ceria nanostructures for protection from radiation-induced cellular damage. Nano Lett 2005, 5:2573-2577.
13. Deshpande S., Patil S., Kuchibhatla S.V., Seal S. Size dependency variation in lattice parameter and valency states in nanocrystalline cerium oxide. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87:133113.
14. Briggs A., Corde S., Oktaria S., Brown R., Rosenfeld A., Lerch M., et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: influence of the high-Z component revealed on radioresistant 9L cell survival under X-ray irradiation. Nanomedicine 2013, 9:1098-1105.
15. Lee S.S., Song W., Cho M., Puppala H.L., Nguyen P., Zhu H., et al. Antioxidant properties of cerium oxide nanocrystals as a function of nanocrystal diameter and surface coating. ACS Nano 2013, 7:9693-9703.
16. Xu C., Qu X. Cerium oxide nanoparticle: a remarkably versatile rare earth nanomaterial for biological applications. NPG Asia Mater 2014, 6:e90.
17. Cifter G., Chin J., Cifter F., Altundal Y., Sinha N., Sajo E., et al. Targeted radiotherapy enhancement during electronic brachytherapy of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using controlled release of gold nanoparticles. Physica Med 2015, 31:1070-1074.
18. Wong C., Stylianopoulos T., Cui J., Martin J., Chauhan V.P., Jiang W., et al. Multistage nanoparticle delivery system for deep penetration into tumor tissue. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:2426-2431.
19. Einstein A., Fürth R. Investigations on the theory of Brownian movement 1956, Dover Publications, New York, N.Y.
20. Sinha N., Cifter G., Sajo E., Kumar R., Sridhar S., Nguyen P.L., et al. Brachytherapy application with in situ dose painting administered by gold nanoparticle eluters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015, 91:385-392.
21. Altundal Y., Cifter G., Detappe A., Sajo E., Tsiamas P., Zygmanski P., et al. New potential for enhancing concomitant chemoradiotherapy with FDA approved concentrations of cisplatin via the photoelectric effect. Physica Med 2015, 31:25-30.
22. Hao Y., Altundal Y., Moreau M., Sajo E., Kumar R., Ngwa W. Potential for enhancing external beam radiotherapy for lung cancer using high-Z nanoparticles administered via inhalation. Phys Med Biol 2015, 60:7035.
23. Cole A. Absorption of 20-eV to 50,000-eV electron beams in air and plastic. Radiat Res 1969, 38:7-33.
24. Perkins S., Cullen D. ENDL type formats for the LLNL evaluated atomic data library, EADL, for the evaluated electron data library, EEDL, and for the evaluated photon data library, EPDL 1994, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, CA (United States).
25. Siemens. Simulation of X-ray spectra.
26. DiFronzo L.A., Tsai P.I., Hwang J.M., Lee J.J., Ryoo M.C., Rahimian J., et al. Breast conserving surgery and accelerated partial breast irradiation using the MammoSite system: initial clinical experience. Arch Surg 2005, 140:787-794.
27. Colon J., Hsieh N., Ferguson A., Kupelian P., Seal S., Jenkins D.W., et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect gastrointestinal epithelium from radiation-induced damage by reduction of reactive oxygen species and upregulation of superoxide dismutase 2. Nanomedicine 2010, 6:698-705.
28. Jain R.K., Stylianopoulos T. Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010, 7:653-664.
29. Asati A., Santra S., Kaittanis C., Perez J.M. Surface-charge-dependent cell localization and cytotoxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4:5321-5331.
30. Perez J.M., Asati A., Nath S., Kaittanis C. Synthesis of biocompatible dextran-coated nanoceria with pH-dependent antioxidant properties. Small 2008, 4:552-556.