Federalism(s)’ forms and norms: Contesting rights, de-essentializing jurisdictional divides, and temporizing accommodations

Federalism and Subsidiarity

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 363-436

  Resnik, Judith ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961290944     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (158)

1. Ronald L. Watts, “Contemporary Views on Federalism,” in Evaluating Federal Systems, ed. Bertus de Villiers (Cape Town: Juta, 1994), 1–29.
2. Daniel Weinstock, “Towards a Normative Theory of Federalism,” International Social Science Journa.l 53 (2001): 75.
3. William H. Riker, Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance (Boston: Little, Brown, 1964), 14–15.
4. Harry N. Scheiber, “Redesigning the Architecture of Federalism—An American Tradition: Modern Devolution Policies in Perspective,” Yale Law and Policy Review 14 (1996): 227–237.
5. Thomas O. Hueghlin and Alan Fenna, Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry (Toronto: Broadview Press, 2005), 11.
6. G. Alan Tarr, “American State Constitutions and Minority Rights,” in Federalism, Subnational Constitutions, and Minority Rights, ed. G. Alan Tarr, Robert F. Williams, and Josef Marko (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004), 89.
7. G. Alan Tarr, “American State Constitutions and Minority Rights,” 90, 92–100.
8. Emily Zackin, Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).
9. Nicolas Schmitt, “New Constitutions for All Swiss Cantons: A Contemporary Challenge,” in Constitutional Dynamics in Federal Systems: Sub-National Perspectives, ed. Michael Burgess and G. Alan Tarr (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012), 140–161.
10. Nicholas Aroney, “Subsidiarity, Federalism and the Best Constitution: Thomas Aquinas on City, Province and Empire,” Law and Philosophy 26 (2007): 161–172.
11. Robert M. Cover, “The Uses ofJurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology, and Innovation,” William and Mary Law Review 22 (1981): 639.
12. Arthur Benz, “From Unitary to Asymmetric Federalism in Germany: Taking Stock after 50 Years,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29 (1999): 55–66.
13. Charlie Jeffery, “German Unification and the Future of the Federal System,” in Evaluating Federal Systems, ed. de Villiers, 268–72, 286–292.
14. Charlie Jeffery, “social solidarity” (ConstitutionalDynamics in Federal Systems, ed. Burgess and Tarr, 22).
15. Judith Resnik and Dennis Curtis, “Inventing Democratic Courts: A New and Iconic Supreme Court,” Journal ofSupreme Court History 38 (2013): 233.
16. William Riker, Federalism, 81–83.
17. Ronald L. Watts, Comparing Federal Systems, Appendix A: The Distribution of Powers and Functions in Federations, A Comparative Overview (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1999), 125–130.
18. Sotirios A. Barber, “Defending Dual Federalism: A Self-Defeating Act”.
19. Steven G. Calabresi and Lucy D. Bickford, “Federalism and Subsidiarity: Perspectives from U.S. Constitutional Law”.
20. Daniel Weinstock, “Cities and Federalism”.
21. Robert Post and Reva Siegel, “Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash,” Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Liberties Law Review 42 (2007): 373.
22. Judith Resnik, “The Production and Reproduction of Constitutional Norms,” New York University Review of Law and Social Change 35 (2011): 226.
23. Jacob T. Levy, “Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties,” American Political Science Review 101 (2007): 459.
24. Ilya Somin, “Foot Voting, Federalism, and Political Freedom”.
25. Stephen Weatherill, “Finding a Role for the Regions in Checking the EU’s Competence,” in The Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe, ed. Stephen Weatherill and Ulf Bernitz (Oxford: Hart, 2005), 131–133.
26. Judith Resnik, “Foreign as Domestic Affairs: Rethinking Horizontal Federalism and Foreign Affairs Preemption in Light of Translocal Internationalism,” Emory Law Journal 57 (2007): 31.
27. Helder de Schutter, “Federalism as Fairness,” Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (2011): 167–168.
28. Reva Siegel, “Why Equal Protection No Longer Protects: The Evolving Forms of Status-Enforcing State Action,” Stanford Law Review 49 (1997): 1111–1113.
29. Joseph H. H. Weiler, “The Transformation of Europe,” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2403.
30. Miguel Poiares Maduro, “Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism,” European Journal of Legal Studies 1 (2007): 1.
31. Neil Walker, “Europe’s Constitutional Momentum and the Search for Polity Legitimacy,” International Jmurnal of Constitutional Law (2005): 221.
32. Alec Stone Sweet, “The European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutional Reordering,” Cardozo Law Review 33 (2012): 1859.
33. Sabino Cassese, When Legal Orders Collide: The Role of Courts (Seville: Global Law Press, 2010).
34. Gregory Shaffer, “Transnational Legal Process and State Change,” Law and Social Inquiry 37 (2012): 229.
35. Neil Walker, “Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders,” International Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law 6 (2008): 373.
36. Saskia Sassen, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).
37. Vicki C. Jackson, “Subsidiarity, the Judicial Role, and the Warren Court’s Contribution to the Revival of State Government,” in this volume; Judith Resnik, “The Internationalism of American Federalism: Missouri and Holland,” Missouri Law Review 73 (2008): 1105.
38. Judith Resnik, Joshua Civin, andJoseph Frueh, “Ratifying Kyoto at the Local Level: Sovereigntism, Federalism, and Translocal Organizations of Government Actors (TOGAs),” Arizona Law Review 50 (2008): 709.
39. Andreas Auer, “The Constitutional Scheme of Federalism,” Journal of European Public Policy 12 (2005): 419.
40. Kristin A. Collins, “Petitions without Numbers: Widows’ Petitions and Early Nineteenth-Century Origins of Public Marriage-Based Entitlements,” Law a, nd History Review 31 (2013): 1.
41. Katherine E. Franke, “Becoming a Citizen: Reconstruction Era Regulation of African American Marriages,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 11 (1999): 251, 268–269.
42. Theda Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1992).
43. Katie Eyer, “Constitutional Colorblindness and the Family,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 162 (forthcoming), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2185728##.
44. Judith Resnik, “‘Naturally’ without Gender: Women, Jurisdiction, and the Federal Courts,” New York University Law Review 66 (1991): 1682, 1721–1730.
45. Martha A. Field, “The Differing Federalisms of Canada and the United States,” Law and Contemporary Problems 55 (1992): 107–108.
46. Claire L’Heureux-Dube, “Economic Consequences of Divorce: A View from Canada,” Houston Law Review 31 (1994): 451.
47. D. A. Rollie Thompson, “Symposium: A Celebration of Canadian Family Law and Dispute Resolution,” Family Court Review 42 (2004): 398–399.
48. Gerald L. Neuman, “The Lost Century of American Immigration Law (1776–1875),” Columbia Law Review 93 (1993): 1833.
49. Cristina M. Rodriguez, “The Significance of the Local in Immigration Regulation,” Michigan Law Review 106 (2008): 567.
50. Michael J. Wishnie, “Laboratories of Bigotry? Devolution of the Immigration Power, Equal Protection, and Federalism,” Immigration and Nationality Law Review 22 (2001): 51.
51. Judith Resnik, “Bordering by Law,” in NOMOS LVI: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration, ed. Jack Knight (New York: NYU Press, forthcoming).
52. Canada-Quebec Accord Relating to Immigration and Temporary Admission of Aliens (1991), http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/laws-policy/agreements/quebec/can-que.asp.
53. Nicolas Schmitt, “New Constitutions for All Swiss Cantons,” 159.
54. Jens Hainmueller and Dominik Hangartner, “Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigration Discrimination,” available at http://www.mit.edu/~jhainm/Paper/hhpp.pdf.
55. David Criekemans, “Regional Sub-state Diplomacy from a Comparative Perspective: Quebec, Scotland, Bavaria, Catalonia, Wallonia and Flanders,” Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5 (2010): 37.
56. William A. Dunning, “Are the States Equal under the Constitution?,” Political Science Quarterly 3 (1888): 427- 453.
57. Charles D. Tarlton, “Symmetry and Asymmetry as Elements of Federalism: A Theoretical Speculation,” Journal of Politics 27 (1965): 861–865.
58. Louise Tillin, “Unity in Diversity? Asymmetry in Indian Federalism,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (2007): 45, 51.
59. Irwin Cotler, “The Supreme Court Appointment Process: Chronology, Context, and Reform,” University of New Brunswick Law Journal 58 (2008): 131, 136.
60. Ronald L. Watts, Comparing Federal Systems, Appendix A, 38.
61. F. Leslie Seidle, ed., Seeking a New Canadian Partnership (Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1994).
62. Ornella Porchia. Constitutional Dynamics in Federal Systems, ed. Burgess and Tarr, 26–27.
63. Gavin Drewry, “The UK Supreme Court—A Fine New Vintage, or Just a Smart New Label on a Dusty Old Bottle?,” International Journal of Court Administration 3 (2011): 4.
64. Peter Leyland, “The Multifaceted Constitutional Dynamics of UK Devolution,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 9 (2011): 251.
65. Aurthur Benz, “From Unitary to Asymmetric Federalism in Germany,” 55.
66. Lousie Tillin, “Unity in Diversity?,” 48–49.
67. Ornella Porchia., Constitutional Dynamics in Federal Systems, ed. Burgess and Tarr, 14–20.
68. Lynn Baker, “Putting the Safeguards Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism,” Villanova Law Review 46 (2001): 951, 955.
69. Gilliam E. Metzger, “Congress, Article IV, and Interstate Relations,” Harvard Law Review 120 (2007): 1469.
70. Anne Mullins and Cheryl Saunders, “Different Strokes for Different Folks? Some Thoughts on Symmetry and Difference in Federal Systems,” in Evaluating Federal Systems, ed. De Villiers, 41.
71. Jorg Broschek, “Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42 (2011): 1.
72. Alfred Stepan, “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model,” Journal of Democracy 10 (1999): 19.
73. William H. Riker, “Federalism,” in Governmental Institutions and Processes, vol. 5. Handbook of Political Science, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975), 93.
74. Vicki C. Jackson, “The Early Hours of the Post World War II Model of Constitutional Federalism: The Warren Court and the World,” in Earl Warren and the Warren Court, ed. Harry N. Scheiber (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007), 137.
75. Sylvia Law, “In the Name of Federalism: The Supreme Court’s Assault on Democracy and Civil Rights,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 70 (2002): 367.
76. Gilliam E. Metzger, “Congress, Article IV, and Interstate Relations,” 1472.
77. Herbert Wechsler, “The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Role of States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government,” Columbia Law Review 54 (1954): 543.
78. Larry D. Kramer, “Understanding Federalism,” Vanderbilt Law Review 47 (1994): 1485.
79. Larry D. Kramer, “Putting the Politics Back in the Political Safeguards of Federalism,” Columbia Law Review 100 (2000): 215.
80. Office on Violence Against Women, Biennial Report to Congress on the Effectiveness of Grant Programs under the Violence Against Women Act, U.S. Department of Justice 9 (2012), available at http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/docs/2012-biennial-report-to-congress.pdf.
81. Office on Violence Against Women, S-T-O-P Program Report, U.S. Department of Justice 6 (2012), available at http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/docs/stop-report-2012.pdf.
82. Judith Resnik, “The Programmatic Judiciary: Lobbying, Judging, and Invalidating the Violence Against Women Act,” Southern California Law Review 47 (2000): 269.
83. Reva Siegel, “‘The Rule of Love’: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy,” Yale Law Journal 105 (1996): 2117.
84. Judith Resnik and Dennis Curtis, Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011), 116.
85. Reva Siegel, “She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family,” Harvard Law Review 115 (2002): 947.
86. Judith Resnik, “Building the Federal Judiciary (Literally and Legally): The Monuments of Chief Justices Taft, Warren, and Rehnquist,” Indiana Law Journal 87 (2012): 823.
87. Abbe R. Gluck, “Federalism from Federal Statutes: Health Reform, Medicaid, and the Old-Fashioned Federalists’ Gamble,” Fordham Law Review81 (2013): 1775.
88. Vicki C. Jackson and Judith Resnik, “Sovereignties—Federal, State, and Tribal: The Story of Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida,” in Federal Courts Stories, ed. Vicki C. Jackson and Judith Resnik (New York: Foundation Press, 2010), 329.
89. Edward Purcell, “The Story of Michigan v. Long: Supreme Court Review and the Workings of American Federalism,” in Federal Courts Stories, ed.Jackson and Resnik, 117–119.
90. Robert M. Cover and Alexander T. Aleinikoff, “Dialectical Federalism: Habeas Corpus and the Court,” Yale Law Journal 86 (1977): 1035.
91. Mark Tushnet and Larry Yackle, “Symbolic Statutes and Real Laws: The Pathologies of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and the Prison Litigation Reform Act,” Duke Law Journal 47 (1997): 1.
92. Stephen B. Bright, “The Failure to Achieve Fairness: Race and Poverty Continue to Influence Who Dies,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2008): 23.
93. Stephen B. Bright and Sia M. Sanneh, Fifty Years of Defiance and Resistance after Gideonv Wainwright,” Yale Law Journal 122 (2013): 2150.
94. Pew Center for the States, One in 100: Behind Bars in American 2008 (February 2008), 3, http:www.pewstates.org/uploadedFilesPPCS_Assets/2008/one%20in%2010.pdf.
95. William J. Stuntz, The Collapse of American Criminal Justice(Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011).
96. Dean Spielmann, Allowing the Right Margin. The European Court of Human Rights and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waiver or Subsidiarity of European Review? (Centre for European Legal Studies, Working Papers Series, February 2012), available at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/cels_lunchtime_seminars/Spielmann%20-%20margin%20of%20appreciation%20cover.pdf.
97. Bilyana Petkova, “The Role of Majori- tarian Activism in Precedent Formation at the European Court of Human Rights,” in The Fabric of International Jurisprudence: An Interdisciplinary Encounter (Robert Shuman Centre for Advanced Studies, EUI Working Paper 2012/51, Antoince Vauchez, ed., 2012), available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/24095.
98. Janneke Gerards, “Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine,” European Law Journal 17 (2011): 80.
99. John L. Murray, “Consensus: Concordance, or Hegemony of the Majority,” Dialogue between Judges (European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe, 2008), available at http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/D6DA05DA-8B1D-41C6-BC38–36CA6F864E6A/0/DIALOGUE_2008_EN.pdf.
100. George Letsas, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)
101. Luzius Wildhaber, “The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, the Present, the Future,” American University International Law Review 22 (2007): 521.
102. Roderick M. Hills Jr., “Counting States,” Harvard Jmurnal of Law and Public Policy 32 (2009): 17.
103. Alec Stone Sweet and Jud Mathews, “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism,” Columbia Jmurnal of Transnational Law 47 (2008): 72.
104. Aharon Barak, “Proportionality and Principled Balancing,” Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (2010): 1–2.
105. Vicki C. Jackson, “Book Review: David M. Beatty, Being Proportional about Proportionality, review of The Ultimate Rule of Law by David M. Beatty (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
106. Judith Resnik and Reva Siegel, “Dis-Uniformity of Rights in Federations and Unions,” in Law’s Borders, prepared with the assistance of Kevin Lamb and Travis Pantin. Ireland Constitution art. 40, sec. 3, subsec. 3 (1983).
107. Siobhan Mullally, “Debating Reproductive Rights in Ireland,” Human Rights Quarterly 27 (2005): 78.
108. Reva B. Siegel, “The Constitutionalization of Abortion,” in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Sajo (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 1057.
109. Henry McDonald, “Limited Abortion Rights Introduced in Historic Irish Legislation,” Guardian (April 30, 2013), http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/01/limited-abortion-rights-ireland.
110. Henry McDonald, “Ireland Passes Law Allowing Limited Rights to Abortion,” Guardian (July 11, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/12/ireland-law -abortion-rights.
111. Tom Whitehead, “European Court Gives Cameron Ultimatum on Prisoner Votes,” Telegraph (April 13, 2011), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8446557/European-court-gives-Cameron-ultimatum-on-prisoner-votes.html.
112. Colm O’Cinneide, “Human Rights, Devolution and the Constrained Authority of the Westminster Parliament,” UK Constitutional Law Group Blog (March 4, 2013), http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/03/04/colm-ocinneide-human-rights-devolution-and-the-constrained-authority-of-the-westminster-parliament.
113. Vicki C. Jackson, “The Supreme Court, the Eleventh Amendment, and State Sovereign Immunity,” Yale Law Journal 98 (1988): 1.
114. Curtis A. Bradley and Jack L. Goldsmith, “Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149 (2000): 399.
115. Eric Neumayer, “Qualified Ratification: Explaining Reservations to International Human Rights Treaties,” Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2007): 397, 406.
116. Antoine Garapon, “Three Challenges for International Criminal Justice,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2 (2004): 716 n. 1.
117. Diane Morgan and Gary Banham, eds., Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
118. Louis Henkin, “U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghosts of Senator Bricker,” American Jmurnal of International Law 89 (1995): 341.
119. Ester Murdukhayeva, “Renewed Affiliations: Using the Reservations Regime to Recommit to CEDAW,” 9–10 (May 9, 2012)
120. Beth A. Simmons, Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 202–255.
121. Hanna Beate Schopp-Schilling, “Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: An Unresolved Issue or (No) New Developments?,” in Reservations to Human Rights Treaties and the Vienna Convention Regime, ed. Ineta Ziemele (Leiden: Brill, 2004), 3–39.
122. Rebecca J. Cook, “Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,” Virginia Journal of International Law 30 (1990): 643.
123. See-Young Cho, “International Human Rights Treaty to Change Social Patterns—The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,” CEGE Discussion Paper 93, at 8–12 (2010).
124. Jennifer Nedelsky, “Communities of Judgment and Human Rights,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 1 (2000): 245.
125. Judith Resnik, “Comparative (In)Equalities: CEDAW, the Jurisdiction of Gender, and the Heterogeneity of Transnational Law Production,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2012): 531.
126. Jodie G. Roure, “Domestic Violence in Brazil: Examining Obstacles and Approaches to Promote Legislative Reform,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 41 (2009): 67, 71–74.
127. Grâinne de Burca and Joanne Scott, “Introduction: New Governance Law and Constitutionalism,” in Law and New Governance in the European Union and the United States, ed. Grâinne de Burca and Joanne Scott (Oxford: Hart, 2006), 1.
128. Judith Resnik, “Law’s Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism’s Multiple Ports of Entry,” Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 1564.
129. Caroline Vout, “The Myth of the Toga: Understanding the History of Roman Dress,” Greece and Rome 43 (1996): 204, 214–216.
130. Marcia Valiante, “The Role of Local Governments in Great Lakes Environmental Governance: A Canadian Perspective,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 40 (2007): 1055, 1074–1075.
131. Stephen Weatherill, “The Challenge of the Regional Dimension in the European Union,” in The Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe, ed. Weatherill and Bernitz, 1, 18–20.
132. Ornella Porchia, “Sub-national Units, Member States, and the European Union,” in Constitutional Dynamics in Federal Systems, ed. Burgess and Tarr, 280.
133. Fernanda Nicola, “The False Promise of Decentralization in EU Cohesion Policy,” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 20 (2011): 65, 80.
134. Nestor M. Davidson, “Cooperative Localism: Federal-Local Collaboration in an Era of State Sovereignty,” Virginia Law Review 93 (2007): 959.
135. Richard C. Schragger, “Can Strong Mayors Empower Weak Cities? On the Power of Local Executives in a Federal System,” Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 2542.
136. John Loughlin, “The Regional Question, Subsidiarity and the Future of Europe,” in The Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe, ed. Weatherill and Bernitz, 157–168.
137. Heather K. Gerken, “Foreword: Federalism All the Way Down,” Harvard Law Review 124 (2010): 4, 38–39.
138. Joxerramon Bengoetxea, “The Participation of Infra-state Entities in European Union Affairs in Spain: The Basque Case,” in The Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe, ed. Weatherill and Bernitz, 47–66.
139. Catriona Carter and Aileen McLeod, “The Scottish Parliament and the European Union: Analysing Regional Parliamentary Engagement,” in The Role ofRegions and Sub-National Actors in Europe, ed. Weatherill and Bernitz, 66–88.
140. Joakim Nergelius, “The Committee of the Regions Today and in the Future—A Critical Review,” in The Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe, ed. Weatherill and Bernitz, 119–122.
141. Ann O’M. Bowman, “Horizontal Federalism: Exploring Interstate Interactions,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2004): 535, 544.
142. Allan Erbsen, “Horizontal Federalism,” Minnesota Law Review 93 (2008): 493.
143. Wayne A. Logan, “Horizontal Federalism in an Age of Criminal Justice Interconnectedness,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154 (2005): 257.
144. Uniform Law Commission: The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, http://www.uniformlaws.org (last visited June 11, 2013).
145. National Association of Attorneys General, “About NAAG,” http://www.naag.org/about_naag.php (last visited June 11, 2013).
146. National Governors Association, “About,” http://www.nga.org/cms/about (last visited June 11, 2013).
147. Conference of Chief Justices, “About CCJ,” http://ccj.ncsc.dni.us/about.html (last visited June 11, 2013).
148. U.S. Conference of Mayors, “U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement” (2005), http://www.usmayors.org/climate protection/documents/mcpAgreement.pdf.
149. U.S. Conference of Mayors, “List of Participating Mayors,” http://www.usmayors.org/climateprotection/list.asp (last visited June 11, 2013).
150. Hoi Kong, “Sustainability and Land Use Regulation in Canada,” Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 13 (2012): 553, 565.
151. Noah J. Toly, “Transnational Municipal Networks in Climate Politics: From Global Governance to Global Politics,” Globalizations 5 (2008): 341.
152. Covenant of Mayors, “The Covenant of Mayors,” http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/about/covenant-of-mayors_en.html (last visited June 11, 2013).
153. Veerle Heyvaert, “What’s in a Name? The Covenant of Mayors as Transnational Environmental Regulation,” Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 22 (2013): 78.
154. Forum of Federations: The Global Network on Federalism and Devolved Governance, “Who We Are,” http./www.forumfed/org/en/about/index.php (last visited June 11, 2013).
155. National League of Cities, “2012 National League of Cities National Municipal Policy and Resolutions,” 27, 140, http://www.onehealth initiative.com/publications/nlc-national-municipal-policy-book-2012.pdf.
156. Koen Lenaerts and Nathan Cambien, “Regions and the European Courts, Giving Shape to the Regional Dimensions of Member States,” European Law Review 35 (2010): 609.
157. Edward L. Rubin and Malcolm Feeley, “Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis,” UCLA Law Review 41 (1994): 903.
158. National League of Cities, “Membership in the National League of Cities: Leading You and Your City to Solutions,” 4, available at http://www.nlc.org/File%20Library/Utility%20Navigation/News%20Center/Media%20Relations/Membership-Brochure%202013.pdf.