Genetic differential susceptibility in literacy-delayed children: A randomized controlled trial on emergent literacy in kindergarten

Development and Psychopathology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 69-79

  Plak, Rachel D ^a   Kegel, Cornelia A T ^a   Bus, Adriana G ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE 4 RECEPTOR; DRD4 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; TEACHING;

CHILD; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LITERACY; MALE; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D4; REMEDIAL TEACHING;

EID: 84961288280     PISSN: 09545794     EISSN: 14692198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579414001308     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2006). Gene-environment interaction of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) and observed maternal insensitivity predicting externalizing behavior in pre-schoolers. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 406-409. doi:10.1002/dev.20152
2. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 39-52. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000635
3. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (in press). The hidden efficacy of interventions: Gene-Environment experiments from a differential susceptibility perspective. Annual Review of Psychology.
4. Barnett, W., Jung, K., Yarosz, D., Thomas, J., Hornbeck, A., Stechuk, R., et al. (2008). Educational effects of the Tools of the Mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 299-313. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.03.001
5. Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300-304. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.x
6. Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummet, B., &Williams, R. (2009). Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 746-754. doi:10.1038/mp.2009.44
7. Belsky, J., &Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis-stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885-908. doi:10.1037/a0017376
8. Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2013). Beyond risk, resilience and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1243-1261. doi:10.1017/S095457941300059X
9. Belsky, J., Pluess, M., &Widaman, K. F. (2013). Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene-environment interaction hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 1135-1143. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12075
10. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2006). Vygotskian perspectives on teaching and learning early literacy. InD.K.Dickinson & S.B.Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 243-256). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Both-De Vries, A. C., & Bus, A. G. (2008). Name writing: A first step to phonetic writing Does the name have a special role in understanding the symbolic function of writing Literacy Teaching and Learning, 12, 37-55.
12. Both-De Vries, A. C., & Bus, A. G. (2010). The proper name as starting point for basic reading skills. Reading and Writing, 23, 173-187. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9158-2
13. Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. T. (in press). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children's literacy: Consequences for engineering apps. Developmental Review.
14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.
16. Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7-28. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000611
17. Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
18. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Howe, G.W., Beach, S. R. H., & Brody, G. H. (2010). Microtrial methods for translating gene-environment dynamics into preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 11, 343-354. doi:10.1007/s11121-010-0177-2
20. Hsiung, G.Y. R., Kaplan, B. J., Petryshen, T. L., Lu, S., &Field, L. L. (2004). A dyslexia susceptibility locus (DYX7) linked to dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) region on chromosome 11p15.5. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 125B, 112-119. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.20082
21. Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analysis. Psychological Science, 23, 572-577. doi:10.1177/0956797611435921
22. Justice, L. M., Chow, S. M., Capellini, C., Flanigan, K., & Colton, S. (2003). Emergent literacy intervention for vulnerable preschoolers: Relative effects of two approaches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 320-332. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2003/078)
23. Kamil, M. L., Intrator, S. M., & Kim, H. S. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, &R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 771-778). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kegel, C. A. T., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Online tutoring as a pivotal quality of web-based early literacy programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 182-192. doi:10.1037/a0025849
25. Kegel, C. A. T., & Bus, A. G. (2013). Links between DRD4, executive attention, and alphabetic skills in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 305-312. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02604.x
26. Kegel, C. A. T., Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility in early literacy instruction through computer games: The role of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 71-78. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01112.x
27. Kegel, C. A. T., Van der Kooy-Hofland, V. A. C., & Bus, A. G. (2009). Improving early phoneme skills with a computer program: Differential effects of regulatory skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 549-554. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.002
28. Keller, M. C. (2014). Gene-Environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: The problem and the (simple) solution. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 18-42. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.09.006
29. Lansink, N., & Hemker, B. (2012). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen Taal voor Kleuters voor groep 1 en 2 uit het Cito volgsysteem primair onderwijs [Scientific justification of literacy tests for the kindergarten years]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
30. Levin, I., Both-De Vries, A. C., Aram, D., & Bus, A. G. (2005).Writing starts with own name writing: From scribbling to conventional spelling in Israeli and Dutch children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 463-477. doi:10.1017/S0142716405050253
31. Lonigan, C. J., Farver, J. M., Phillips, B. M., & Clancy-Menchetti, J. (2011). Promoting the development of preschool children's emergent literacy skills: A randomized evaluation of a literacy-focused curriculum and two professional development models. Reading and Writing, 24, 305-337. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9214-6
32. Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. National Center for Family Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention.Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
34. Obradović, J., Bush, N. R., Stamperdahl, J., Adler, N. E., & Boyce, W. T. (2010). Biological sensitivity to context: The interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socio-emotional behavior and school readiness. Child Development, 81, 270-289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01394.x
35. Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184-202. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3
36. Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1999). Drug addiction: Bad habits add up. Nature, 398, 567-570. doi:10.1038/19208
37. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
39. Tripp, G., & Wickens, J. R. (2008). Dopamine transfer deficit: A neurobiological theory of altered reinforcement mechanisms in ADHD. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 691-704. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007. 01851.x
40. van Breukelen, G. J. P., & van Dijk, K. R. A. (2007). Use of covariates in randomized controlled trials. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 903-904. doi:10.10170S1355617707071147
41. van den Berg, H., & Bus, A. G. (in press). Beneficial effects of BookStart in temperamentally highly reactive infants. Learning and Individual Differences.
42. van der Kooy-Hofland, V. A. C., Bus, A. G., & Roskos, K. A. (2012). Effects of a brief but intensive remedial computer intervention in a sub-sample of kindergartners with early literacy delays. Reading andWriting, 25, 1479-1497. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9328-5
43. Van I, Jzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). Differential susceptibility experiments: Going beyond correlational evidence: Comment on beyond mental health, differential susceptibility articles. Developmental Psychology, 48, 769-774. doi:10.1037/a0027536
44. Van I, Jzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2015). Genetic differential susceptibility on trial: Meta-analytic support from randomized controlled experiments. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 151-162.
45. Van I, Jzendoorn, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., Belsky, J., Beach, S., Brody, G., Dodge, K., et al. (2011). Gene-by-environment experiments: A new approach to find missing heritability. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 881. doi:10.1038/nrg2764-c1
46. Wasserman, T., & DruckerWasserman, L. (2012). The sensitivity and specificity of neuropsychological tests in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity diagnosis. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 1, 90-99. doi:10.1080/21622965.2012.702025
47. Widaman, K. F., Helm, J. L., Castro-Schilo, L., Pluess, M., Stallings, M. C., & Belsky, J. (2012). Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychological Methods, 17, 615-622. doi:10.1037/a0030003