R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 157-176

  Martin, Ben R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

policy design; Policy instruments; policy mix; R D policy

Indexed keywords

LITERATURE REVIEW; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 84961208542     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: 14698390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146125     Document Type: Review

References (127)

1. K.Aerts,, and T.Schmidt. 2008. “Two for the Price of One?” Research Policy 37: 806–822.10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.011
2. D.W.Aksnes,, N.Frølich, and S.Slipersæter. 2008. “Science Policy and the Driving Forces behind the Internationalisation of Science: The Case of Norway.” Science and Public Policy 35: 445–457.10.3152/030234208X331236
3. E.Arnold,, and P.Boekholt. 2002. Measuring ‘Relative Effectiveness’– Can We Compare Innovation Policy Instruments?” Six Countries Programme Conference on “Innovation Policy and Sustainable Development: Can Public Innovation Incentives Make a Difference? Brussels, 28 February–1 March, 2002. http://www.6cp.net/downloads/02brussels_arnold_boekholt_paper.doc
4. I.Bache,, and M.Flinders, eds. 2004. Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. A.Barge-Gil,, and A.Modrego-Rico. 2008. “Are Technology Institutes a Satisfactory Tool for Public Intervention in the Area of Technology? A Neoclassical and Evolutionary Evaluation.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 808–823.10.1068/c70m
6. N.Bloom,, R.Griffith, and J.Van Reenen. 2002. “Do R&D Tax Credits Work? Evidence from a Panel of Countries 1979–1997.” Journal of Public Economics 85: 1–31.10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00086-X
7. P.Boekholt,, M.Lankhuizen, E.Arnold, J.Clarke, J.Kuusisto, B.de Laat, P.Simmonds, S.Cozzens, G.Kingsley, and R.Johnston. 2001. An International Review of Methods to Measure Relative Effectiveness of Technology Policy Instruments. Final report to the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs EZ, Technopolis, Brighton. http://www.technopolis-group.com/resources/downloads/reports/261_EZ_Final_010723.pdf
8. S.Borrás, 2009. “The Widening and Deepening of Innovation Policy: What Conditions Provide for Effective Governance?” CIRCLE Working Paper 2009/02 http://www4.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/200902_Borras.pdf
9. S.Borrás,, C.Chaminade, and C.Edquist. 2009. “The Challenges of Globalization: Strategic Choices for Innovation Policy.” In The Innovation Imperative: National Innovation Strategies in the Global Economy, edited by G.Marklund, N.S.Vonortas, and C.W.Wessner, 7–23. Cheltenham: Elgar.
10. S.Borrás,, and C.Edquist. 2013. “The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80: 1513–1522.
11. S.Borrás,, G.León, M.Bucar, J.Edler, K.Halme, A.Havas, S.Kuhlmann,. 2009. The Open Method of Coordination in Research Policy: Assessment and Recommendations. Brussels: European Commission, EUR 23874. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1255593891_omc_coordination_2009.pdf
12. L.M.Branscomb,, and R.Florida. 1998. “Challenges to Technology Policy.” In Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works, edited by L.M.Branscomb and J.H.Keller, 3–39. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. D.Braun, 2005. “How to Govern Research in the ‘Age of Innovation’: Compatibilities and Incompatibilities of Policy Rationales.” In New Governance Arrangements in Science Policy, edited by M.Lengwiler, and D.Simon. Berlin: WZB. http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2005/p05-101.pdf
14. H.T.A.Bressers, H Th A. 1988. “A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Incentives and Directives: The Case of Dutch Water Quality Policy.” Review of Policy Research 7: 500–518. http://doc.utwente.nl/70846/1/Bressers88comparison.pdf10.1111/ropr.1988.7.issue-3
15. H.A.Bressers,, and L.J.O’Toole. 2005. “Instrument Selection and Implementation in a Networked Context.” In Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, edited by P.Eliadis,, M.M.Hill, and M.Howlett, 132–153. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
16. R.Brown, 2016. “Mission Impossible? Entrepreneurial Universities in Peripheral Regional Innovative Systems.” Industry and Innovation (this issue).
17. C.Cagnin,, E.Amanatidou, and M.Keenan. 2012. “Orienting European Innovation Systems towards Grand Challenges and the Roles That FTA Can Play.” Science and Public Policy 39: 140–152.10.1093/scipol/scs014
18. R.Carew, 2005. “Science Policy and Agricultural Biotechnology in Canada.” Review of Agricultural Economics 27: 300–316.10.1111/raec.2005.27.issue-3
19. C.Chaminade,, and C.Edquist. 2005. “From Theory to Practice: The Use of Systems of Innovation Approach in Innovation Policy.” CIRCLE Working Paper 2005/02 http://www4.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/200502_Chaminade_Edquist.pdf.
20. H.W.Chesbrough, 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21. T.Clausen, 2009. “Do Subsidies Have Positive Impacts on R&D and Innovation Activities at the Firm Level?” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 20: 239–253.10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
22. W.M.Cohen,, and D.A.Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.10.2307/2393553
23. P.Cooke, 2004a. “Life Sciences Clusters and Regional Science Policy.” Urban Studies 41: 1113–1131.10.1080/00420980410001675814
24. P.Cooke, 2004b. “Biosciences and the Rise of Regional Science Policy.” Science and Public Policy 31: 185–197.10.3152/147154304781779994
25. F.Crespi,, and F.Quatraro. 2013. “Systemic Technology Policies: Issues and Instruments.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80: 1447–1449.
26. P.Cunningham,, J.Edler, K.Flanagan, and P.Laredo. 2013b. “Innovation Policy Mix and Instrument Interaction: A Review.” NESTA Working Paper 13 (20). London: NESTA.
27. P.Cunningham,, and A.Gök. 2012. “The Impact and Effectiveness of Policies to Support Collaboration for R&D and Innovation.” NESTA Working Paper 12 (06). London: NESTA.
28. P.Cunningham,, P.Laredo, and A.Gök. 2013a. “The Impact of Direct Support to R&D and Innovation in Firms.” NESTA Working Paper 13 (03). London: NESTA.
29. P.Cunningham,, and R.Ramlogan. 2012. “The Effects of Innovation Network Policies.” NESTA Working Paper 12 (04). London: NESTA.
30. D.Czarnitzki,, B.Ebersberger, and A.Fier. 2007. “The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 1347–1366.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255
31. D.Czarnitzki,, P.Hanel, and J.M.Rosa. 2011. “Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Innovation: A Microeconometric Study on Canadian Firms.” Research Policy 40: 217–229.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017
32. D.Czarnitzki,, and C.L.Bento. 2012. “Evaluation of Public R&D Policies: A Cross-Country Comparison.” World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9: 254–282.10.1504/WRSTSD.2012.047690
33. P.A.David,, B.H.Hall, and A.A.Toole. 2000. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence.” Research Policy 29: 497–529.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
34. M.Dodgson,, A.Hughes, J.Foster, and S.Metcalfe. 2011. “Systems Thinking, Market Failure, and the Development of Innovation Policy: The Case of Australia.” Research Policy 40: 1145–1156.10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
35. G.B.Doern,, and C.Stoney. 2009a. “Federal Research and Innovation Policies and Canadian Universities: A Framework for Analysis.” In Research and Innovation Policy: Changing Federal Government-University Relations, edited by G.B.Doern and C.Stoney, 3–34. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
36. G.B.Doern,, and C.Stoney, eds. 2009b. Research and Innovation Policy: Changing Federal Government-University Relations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
37. J.Edler, 2009. “Demand Policies for Innovation in EU CEE Countries.” Manchester Business School Working Paper 579 http://www.mbsportal.bl.uk/secure/subjareas/techinnov/mubs/wp/114396WP579_09.pdf.
38. J.Edler,, and L.Georghiou 2007. “Public Procurement and Innovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side.” Research Policy: 949–963.10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
39. J.Edler,, M.Berger, M.Dinges, and A.Gök. 2012. “The Practice of Evaluation in Innovation Policy in Europe.” Research Evaluation 21: 167–182.10.1093/reseval/rvs014
40. J.Edler,, P.Cunningham, A.Gök, and P.Shapira. 2013. “Impacts of Innovation Policy: Synthesis and Conclusion.” NESTA Working Paper 13 (21). London: NESTA.
41. J.Edler,, P.Cunningham, A.Gök, and P.Shapira. Forthcoming. Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. July 2016. http://www.e-elgar.com/shop/handbook-of-innovation-policy-impact.
42. C.Edquist, 2001. “The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An Account of the State of the Art.” Paper presented at The DRUID Conference, Aalborg, 12–15 June 2001 http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds2001-178.pdf
43. C.Edquist, 2011. “Design of Innovation Policy through Diagnostic Analysis: Identification of Systemic Problems (or Failures).” Industrial and Corporate Change 20: 1725–1753.10.1093/icc/dtr060
44. C.Edquist,, and L.Hommen. 1999. “Systems of Innovation: Theory and Policy for the Demand Side.” Technology in Society 21: 63–79.10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00037-2
45. P.Eliadis,, M.M.Hill, and M.Howlett, eds. 2005. Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
46. A.Elzinga, 2010. “New Public Management, Science Policy and the Orchestration of University Research—Academic Science the Loser.” The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 6: 307–332.
47. A.Elzinga, 2012. “Features of the Current Science Policy Regime: Viewed in Historical Perspective.” Science and Public Policy 39: 416–428.10.1093/scipol/scs046
48. D.Engel,, M.Rothgang, and V.Eckl. 2016. “Systemic Aspects of R&D Policy Subsidies for R&D Collaborations and Their Effects on Private R&D.” Industry and Innovation (this issue).
49. EPUB. 2002. RTD Evaluation Toolbox. Report of EPUB the thematic network on the socio-economic evaluation of public RTD policies prepared by the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies of the Joint Research Centre, and the Institute of Technology and regional Policy, Joanneum Research.
50. A.Fier,, and O.Heneric. 2009. “Public R&D Policy: The Right Turns of the Wrong Screw? The Case of the German Biotechnology Industry.” International Studies in Entrepreneurship 19: 147–168.
51. K.Flanagan,, E.Uyarra, and M.Laranja. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40: 702–713.10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
52. K.Flanagan,, and E.Uyarra. 2016. “Four Dangers in Innovation Policy Studies—And How to Avoid Them.” Industry and Innovation (this issue).
53. C.Freeman, 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
54. L.Georghiou,, J.Edler, E.Uyarra, and J.Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 86: 1–12.
55. X.González,, and C.Pazó. 2008. “Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R&D Spending?” Research Policy 37: 371–389.10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
56. J.Groenewegen,, and M.van der Steen. 2007. “The Evolutionary Policy Maker.” Journal of Economic Issues 41: 351–358.
57. D.Guellec,, and B.Van Pottelsbergue De La Potterie. 2001. “The Effectiveness of Public Policies in R&D.” Revue d'Économie Industrielle 94: 49–68.10.3406/rei.2001.1780
58. M.Guerzoni,, and E.Raiteri. 2012. “Innovative Public Procurement and R&D Subsidies: Hidden Treatment and New Empirical Evidence on the Technology Policy Mix in a Quasi-Experimental Setting.” Dipartimento di Economia “S. Cognetti de Martiis” Università di Torino, Working paper 18/2012. http://www.unito.it/unitoWAR/ShowBinary/FSRepo/D031/Allegati/WP2012Dip_L%26B/18_WP_Momigliano.pdf.
59. R.Gustafsson,, and E.Autio. 2011. “A Failure Trichotomy in Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation.” Research Policy 40: 819–831.10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.007
60. D.H.Guston, 1996. “Principal-Agent Theory and the Structure of Science Policy.” Science and Public Policy 23: 229–240.
61. B.Hall,, and J.Van Reenen. 2000. “How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Review of the Evidence.” Research Policy 29: 449–469.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2
62. J.C.Harper, 2013. “Impact of Technology Foresight.” NESTA Working Paper 13 (16). London: NESTA.
63. R.Harris,, Q.C.Li, and M.Trainor. 2009. “Is a Higher Rate of R&D Tax Credit a Panacea for Low Levels of R&D in Disadvantaged Regions?” Research Policy 38: 192–205.10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.016
64. M.P.Hekkert,, R.A.A.Suurs, S.O.Negro, S.Kuhlmann, and R.E.H.M.Smits. 2007. “Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 74: 413–432.
65. L.Henriques,, and P.Larédo. 2013. “Policy-Making in Science Policy: The ‘OECD Model’ Unveiled.” Research Policy 42: 801–816.10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.004
66. S.J.Herstad,, C.Bloch, B.Ebersberger, and E.van de Velde. 2010. “National Innovation Policy and Global Open Innovation: Exploring Balances, Tradeoffs and Complementarities.” Science and Public Policy 37: 113–124.10.3152/030234210X489590
67. L.Himanen,, O.Auranen, H.M.Puuska, and M.Nieminen. 2009. “Influence of Research Funding and Science Policy on University Research Performance: A Comparison of Five Countries.” Science and Public Policy 36: 419–430.10.3152/030234209X461006
68. P.Högselius, 2008. “Lost in Translation? Science, Technology and the State since the 1970s.” CESIS Electronic Working Paper 119. http://www.kth.se/dokument/itm/cesis/CESISWP119.pdf.
69. C.Hood, 1983. “Using Bureaucracy Sparingly.” Public Administration 61: 197–208.10.1111/padm.1983.61.issue-2
70. C.Hood, 1986. The Tools of Government. London: Chatham House.
71. L.Hooghe,, and G.Marks. 2003. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
72. M.Howlett, 2011. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. London: Routledge.
73. M.Howlett,, and J.Rayner. 2007. “Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in “New Governance Arrangements”.” Policy and Society 26 (4): 1–18.
74. K.Hussinger, 2008. “R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semiparametric Two-Step Selection Models.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 729–747.10.1002/jae.v23:6
75. M.Jacob, 2005. “Boundary Work in Contemporary Science Policy: A Review.” Prometheus 23: 195–207.10.1080/08109020500099354
76. M.Jacob,, and V.L.Meek. 2013. “Scientific Mobility and International Research Networks: Trends and Policy Tools for Promoting Research Excellence and Capacity Building.” Studies in Higher Education 38: 331–344.10.1080/03075079.2013.773789
77. B.Johansson,, C.Karlsson, and M.Backman. 2007. “Innovation Policy Instruments.” CESIS Working Paper 105. http://www.kth.se/dokument/itm/cesis/CESISWP105.pdf.
78. R.Kaiser,, and M.Kripp. 2010. “Demand-Orientation in National Systems of Innovation: A Critical Review of Current European Innovation Policy Concepts.” Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, Imperial College, 16–18 June 2010.
79. T.J.Klette,, J.Møen, and Z.Griliches. 2000. “Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconometric Evaluation Studies.” Research Policy 29: 471–495.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4
80. S.J.Kline,, and N.Rosenberg. 1986. “An Overview of Innovation.” In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, edited by R.Landau and N.Rosenberg, 275–305. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
81. C.Köhler,, P.Laredo, and C.Rammer. 2012. “The Impact and Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives for R&D.” NESTA Working Paper 12 (01). London: NESTA.
82. S.Kuhlmann, 2001. “Future Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe – Three Scenarios.” Research Policy 30: 953–976.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00167-0
83. S.Kuhlmann, 2003. “Evaluation of Research and Innovation Policies: A Discussion of Trends with Examples from Germany.” International Journal of Technology Management 26: 131–149.10.1504/IJTM.2003.003366
84. S.Kuhlmann,, and J.Edler. 2003. “Scenarios of Technology and Innovation Policies in Europe: Investigating Future Governance.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 70: 619–637.
85. S.Kuhlmann,, P.Shapira, and R.Smits. 2010. “Introduction. a Systemic Perspective: The Innovation Policy Dance.” In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy, edited by R.E.Smits, S.Kuhlmann, and P.Shapira, 1–22. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
86. R.Landry,, and F.Varone. 2005. “The Choice of Policy Instruments: Confronting the Deductive and the Interactive Approaches.” In Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, edited by P.Eliadis, M.M.Hill, and M.Howlett. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
87. L.Langfeldt,, H.Godø, A.Gornitzka, and A.Kaloudis. 2012. “Integration Modes in EU Research: Centrifugality versus Coordination of National Research Policies.” Science and Public Policy 39: 88–98.10.1093/scipol/scs001
88. M.Laranja,, E.Uyarra, and K.Flanagan. 2008. “Policies for Science, Technology and Innovation: Translating Rationales into Regional Policies in a Multi-Level Setting.” Research Policy 37: 823–835.10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
89. I.M.Larsen, 2000. “University Research Policy in Norway - Walking the Tightrope between Internal and External Interests.” European Journal of Education 35: 385–402.10.1111/ejed.2000.35.issue-4
90. B.Laurent, 2011. “Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 649–666.10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1
91. B.-Å.Lundvall, 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter.
92. A.Mansikkasalo,, and P.Söderholm. 2012. “Energy Efficient and Low-Carbon Technology in Process Industries: Innovation, Diffusion and the Role of Public Policy.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market EEM 2012, 10–12 May 2012. doi:10.1109/EEM.2012.6254743.
93. B.R.Martin, 2012. “The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies.” Research Policy 41: 1219–1239.10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
94. M.Matt,, S.Robin, and S.Wolff. 2012. “The Influence of Public Programs on Inter-Firm R&D Collaboration Strategies: Project-Level Evidence from EU FP5 and FP6.” Journal of Technology Transfer 37: 885–916.10.1007/s10961-011-9232-9
95. M.Mazzucato, 2016. “From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy.” Industry and Innovation (this issue).
96. J.S.Metcalfe, 1994. “Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy.” The Economic Journal 104: 931–944.10.2307/2234988
97. L.K.Mytelka,, and K.Smith. 2002. “Policy Learning and Innovation Theory: An Interactive and Co-Evolving Process.” Research Policy 31: 1467–1479.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8
98. C.Nauwelaers,, and R.Wintjes. 2002. “Innovating SMEs and Regions: The Need for Policy Intelligence and Interactive Policies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14: 201–215.
99. R.R.Nelson,, ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. R.R.Nelson,, and S.W.Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101. J.Nill,, and R.Kemp. 2009. “Evolutionary Approaches for Sustainable Innovation Policies: From Niche to Paradigm?” Research Policy 38: 668–680.10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011
102. G.Papaconstantinou,, and W.Polt. 1997. “Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology: An Overview”. In Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology: Towards Best Practices. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/1907871.pdf
103. I.W.H.Parry, 1995. “Optimal Pollution Taxes and Endogenous Technological Progress.” Resource and Energy Economics 17: 69–85.10.1016/0928-7655(94)00010-H
104. I.W.H.Parry, 2003. “On the Implications of Technological Innovation for Environmental Policy.” Environment and Development Economics 8: 57–76.
105. M.Pastor,, and J.Sandonı́s. 2002. “Research Joint Ventures Vs. Cross Licensing Agreements: An Agency Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 215–249.10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00070-9
106. B.Persson, 2008. “The Development of a New Swedish Innovation Policy: A Historical Institutional Approach.” CIRCLE Working Paper 2008/02 http://www.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/200802_Persson.pdf.
107. B.Perry,, and T.May. 2007. “Governance, Science Policy and Regions: An Introduction.” Regional Studies 41: 1039–1050.10.1080/00343400701565846
108. E.Petrakis,, and J.Poyago-Theotoky. 2002. “R&D Subsidies versus R&D Cooperation in a Duopoly with Spillovers and Pollution.” Australian Economic Papers 41: 37–52.10.1111/aepa.2002.41.issue-1
109. A.Rip,, and A.J.Nederhof. 1986. “Between Dirigism and Laissez-Faire: Effects of Implementing the Science Policy Priority for Biotechnology in the Netherlands.” Research Policy 15: 253–268.10.1016/0048-7333(86)90025-9
110. J.E.Rubio,, and N.Tshipamba. 2010. “Elements of the Public Policy of Science, Technology and Innovation.” Canadian Social Science 6: 61–80.
111. C.M.Sá, C. M., and J.Litwin. 2011. “University–Industry Research Collaborations in Canada: The Role of Federal Policy Instruments.” Science and Public Policy 38: 425–435.
112. S.Sandhu,, and I.Anghel. 2010. “The Interaction of Policy-Mix Instruments Conducive to Increasing Investment in Romania.” Curentul Juridic 42: 150–162.
113. L.Sanz-Menéndez,, and L.Cruz-Castro. 2005. “Explaining the Science and Technology Policies of Regional Governments.” Unidad De Politicas Comparadas CSIC Working Paper 05 (10) http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/1644
114. P.Shapira,, H.Klein, and S.Kuhlmann. 2001. “Innovations in European and US Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 30: 869–872.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00161-X
115. P.Shapira,, and J.Wang. 2007. “R&D Policy in the United States: The Promotion of Nanotechnology R&D.” ‘Policy Mix’ Working Paper http://stip.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/PM-CaseStudy_US_Nanotech_2007.pdf.
116. R.Smits,, and S.Kuhlmann. 2004. “The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1: 4–32.10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621
117. M.Squicciarini, 2008. “Science Parks’ Tenants versus out-of-Park Firms: Who Innovates More? A Duration Model.” Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 45–71.10.1007/s10961-007-9037-z
118. T.Takalo, 2009. “Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies.” ETLA Working Paper 1185 http://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/dp1185.pdf.
119. T.Takalo,, T.Tanayama, and O.Toivanen. 2010. “Innovation Policy Reform.” Working Paper http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/public/N10076/Takalo_Tanayama_Toivanen_050310.pdf.
120. F.Tödtling,, and M.Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits All?” Research Policy 34: 1203–1219.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
121. E.Uyarra,, and R.Ramlogan. 2012. “The Effects of Cluster Policy on Innovation.” NESTA Working Paper 12 (05). London: NESTA.
122. B.Van der Meulen, 1998. “Science Policies as Principal–Agent Games.” Research Policy 27: 397–414.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00049-3
123. E.Vedung, 2010. “Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories.” In Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, edited by M.L.Bemelmans-Videc, R.C.Rist, and E.Vedung, 21–58. New Brunswick: Transaction.
124. E.von Hippel,, and J.P.J.de Jong. 2010. “Open, Distributed and User-Centered: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Innovation Policy.” EIM Working Paper. Zoetermeer. http://www.ondernemerschap.nl/pdf-ez/H201009.pdf.
125. P.Warnke,, and G.Heimeriks. 2008. “Technology Foresight as Innovation Policy Instrument—Learning from Science and Technology Policy Studies.” In Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Strategic Intelligence for an Innovative Economy, edited by C.Cagnin, M.Keenan, R.Johnston, F.Scapolo, and R.Barré, 71–87. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
126. Y.Wu, 2005. “The Effects of State R&D Tax Credits in Stimulating Private R&D Expenditure: A Cross-State Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24: 785–802.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
127. R.M.Yawson, 2009. “The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation Policy.” The Future of Innovation” Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference, Vienna, Austria, 21–24 June 2009 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1417676