The effects of state R&D tax credits in stimulating private R&D expenditure: A cross-state empirical analysis

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 785-802

  Wu, Yonghong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444446965     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20138     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). (1976-1995). Significant features of fiscal federalism. Washington, DC: ACIR.
2. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609-625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Berglund, D., & Coburn, C. (1995). Partnerships: A compendium of state and federal cooperative programs. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
4. Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from an international panel of countries 1979-1997. Working Paper No. W99/8, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
5. David, P., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 497-529.
6. Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12(3), 225-243.
7. Hall, B. H., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 449-469.
8. Hall, B. H., & Wosinska, M. (1999). Effectiveness of the California R&D tax credit. Retrieved March 19, 2005, from http://www.ccst.us/ccst/pubs/ crest/pubs/pireports/html/hall.html.
9. Mairesse, J., & Sassenou, M. (1991). R&D and productivity: A survey of econometric studies at the firm level. Science-Technology Industry Review, 8, 9-43.
10. Mohnen, P. (1992). The relationship between R&D and productivity growth in Canada and other major industrialized countries. Ottawa, Canada: Canada Communication Group.
11. Mohnen, P. (1996). R&D externalities and productivity growth. Science-Technology Industry Review, 18, 39-66.
12. National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Science Resources Studies (2000), Research and development in industry: 1998, NSF 01-305. Arlington, VA: NSF.
13. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
14. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 1), S71-S102.
15. State Science and Technology Institute (SSTI). (1997). State research and development tax incentives. Columbus, Ohio: SSTI.