Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-setting: From Abstract Principles to Complex Practice

Science as Culture

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 239-263

  Knaapen, Loes ^a   Lehoux, Pascale ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

evidence based guidelines; Patient and Public Involvement; standardization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961202376     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2015.1125875     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. AGREE Collaborative Group. (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project, Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12, pp. 18–23. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.18
2. M.Akrich,, M.Leane,, C.Roberts, and J.A.Nunes,. (2012) Practising childbirth activism: A politics of evidence. CSI Working Papers Series. N. 023. Available at www.csi.ensmp.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_023.pdf (Accessed 24 October 2012).
3. D.Armstrong, (2007) Professionalism, indeterminacy and the EBM project, BioSocieties, 2, pp. 73–84. doi: 10.1017/S1745855207005066
4. J.Bensing, (2000) Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine, Patient Education and Counselling, 39, pp. 17–25. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00087-7
5. M.Berg,, R.T.Meulen, and M.van den Burg, (2001) Guidelines for appropriate care: The importance of empirical normative analysis, Health Care Analysis, 9, pp. 77–99. doi: 10.1023/A:1011307112091
6. A.Bogner, (2012) The paradox of participation experiments, Science Technology & Human Values, 37, pp. 506–527. doi: 10.1177/0162243911430398
7. A.Boivin,. (2012) G-I-N PUBLIC toolkit introduction. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines. Guidelines International Network. Available at http://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/g-i-n-public/toolkit/toolkit-intro.pdf (Accessed 23 June 2014).
8. A.Boivin,, K.Currie,, B.Fervers,, J.Gracia,, M.James,, C.Marshall,, C.Sakala,, S.Sanger,, J.Strid,, V.Thomas,, T.van der Weijden,, R.Grol, and J.Burgers, 2010. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: International experiences and future perspectives, Quality Safety in Health Care, 19, pp. e22. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025700
9. A.Boivin,, J.Green,, J.van der Meulen,, F.Legare, and E.Nolte, (2009) Why consider patients’ preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developers, Medical Care, 47, pp. 908–915. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a81158
10. A.Boivin, and F.Légaré,. 2007. Public involvement in guideline production. [Letter], CMAJ, 1976, pp. 1308–1309. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1060241
11. A.Boivin,, F.Légaré, and P.Lehoux, 2008. Decision technologies as normative instruments: Exposing the values within, Patient Education and Counselling, 73, pp. 426–430. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.017
12. G.C.Bowker, and S.L.Star, (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (Cambridge: MIT Press).
13. L.Busch, (2011) Standards: Recipes for Reality (Cambridge: MIT Press).
14. M.Callon, (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation—Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay, in: J.Law (Ed) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196–223 (London: Routledge).
15. J.F.Caron-Flinterman,, J.E.W.Broerse, and J.F.G.Bunders, (2005) The experiential knowledge of patients: A new resource for biomedical research?, Social Science & Medicine, 60, pp. 2575–2584. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023
16. CBO and NPCF. (2009) Blauwdruk patiëntenparticipatie in richtlijnontwikkeling. Leidraad voor richtlijnontwikkelaars en werkgroepleden [Blueprint patient participation in guideline development. Guideline for guideline developers and working group members]. Utrecht: CBO. Available at www.cbo.nl/thema/Richtlijnen/Patientenparticipatie-voor-richtlijnontwikkelaar (Accessed 26 September 2012).
17. C.A.Chong,, I.J.Chen,, G.Naglie, and M.D.Krahn, (2009) How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Journal of General Internal Mediine, 24, pp. 977–982. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0987-8
18. J.Church,, D.Saunders,, M.Wanke,, R.Pong,, C.Spooner, and M.Dorgan, (2002) Citizen participation in health decision-making: Past experience and future prospects, Journal of Public Health Policy, 23, pp. 12–32. doi: 10.2307/3343116
19. H.M.Collins, Harry M. (1992) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
20. H.M.Collins, and R.Evans,. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience, Social Studies of Science, 32, pp. 235–296. doi: 10.1177/0306312702032002003
21. P.Diaz del Campo,, J.Gracia,, J.A.Blasco, and E.Andradas, 2011. A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: Methodological approaches, BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, pp. 779–784. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049031
22. S.Dyer, (2004) Rationalising public participation in the health service: The case of research ethics committees, Health & Place, 10, pp. 339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.08.004
23. D.M.Eddy, (2005) Evidence-based medicine: A unified approach, Health Affair (Millwood), 24, pp. 9–17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.9
24. S.Epstein, (1995) The construction of lay expertise—Aids activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical-trials, Science Technology & Human Values, 20, pp. 408–437. doi: 10.1177/016224399502000402
25. S.Epstein, (2003) Inclusion, diversity, and biomedical knowledge making: The multiple politics of representation, in: N.Oudshoorn and T.Pinch (Eds) How users Matter. The Co-construction of users and Technology, pp. 173–190 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
26. U.Felt, and M.Fochler, (2010) Machineries for making publics: Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement, Minerva, 48, pp. 219–238. doi: 10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x
27. M.J.Field, and K.N.Lohr, (Eds). (1990) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Institute of Medicine (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
28. L.Forbat,, G.Hubbard, and N.Kearney, (2009) Patient and public involvement: Models and muddles, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, pp. 2547–2554. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02519.x
29. C.Gad, and D.Ribes, (2014) The conceptual and the empirical in science and technology studies, Science, Technology & Human Values, 39, pp. 183–191. doi: 10.1177/0162243914522304
30. G-I-N PUBLIC Steering Committee. (2012) G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines. Available at http://www.g-i-n.net/working-groups/gin-public/toolkit (Accessed 20 May 2015).
31. A.L.Greer,, J.S.Goodwin,, J.L.Freeman, and Z.H.Wu, (2002) Bringing the patient back in. Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18, pp. 747–761. doi: 10.1017/S0266462302000569
32. L.F.Hogle, (1995) Standardization across nonstandard domains—the case of organ procurement, Science Technology & Human Values, 20, pp. 482–500. doi: 10.1177/016224399502000405
33. Institute of Medicine. (2011) Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
34. M.Kelson, (2001) Patient involvement in clinical guideline development—where are we now?, Journal of Clinical Governance, 9, pp. 169–174.
35. L.Knaapen, (2012) European regulation and harmonization of clinical practice guidelines, in: S.Greer and P.Kurzer (Eds) European Union Public Health Policy: Regional and Global Trends, pp. 64–80. (New York: Routledge).
36. L.Knaapen, (2013) Being evidence-based in the absence of evidence: The management of non-Evidence in guideline development, Social Studies of Science, 43, pp. 681–706. doi: 10.1177/0306312713483679
37. L.Knaapen, (2014) Evidence based medicine or cookbook medicine? Addressing concerns over the standardization of care, Sociology Compass, 8, pp. 823–836. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12184
38. L.Knaapen,, H.Cazeneuve,, A.Cambrosio,, P.Castel, and B.Fervers, (2010) Pragmatic evidence and textual arrangements: A case study of French clinical cancer guidelines, Social Science & Medicine, 71, pp. 685–692. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.019
39. H.Lambert, (2006) Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine, Social Science & Medicine, 62, pp. 2633–2645. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.023
40. J.Latimer,, K.Featherstone,, P.Atkinson,, A.Clarke,, D.T.Pilz, and A.Shaw, (2006) Rebirthing the clinic—The interaction of clinical judgment and genetic technology in the production of medical science, Science Technology & Human Values, 31, pp. 599–630. doi: 10.1177/0162243906289613
41. B.Latour, (1983) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. in: K.Knorr-Cetina and M.Mulkay (Eds) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, pp. 141–170 (London: Sage).
42. F.Légaré,, A.Boivin,, T.van der Weijden,, C.Pakenham,, J.Burgers,, J.Légaré,, S.St-Jacques, and S.Gagnon, (2011) Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: Knowledge synthesis of existing programs, Medical Decision Making, 31, pp. E45–E74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11424401
43. P.Lehoux,, G.Daudelin, and J.Abelson, (2012a) The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes, Social Science & Medicine, 74, pp. 1843–1850. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023
44. P.Lehoux,, G.Daudelin, and J.Abelson, (2012b) A response to Martin on the role of citizens, publics and others in participatory processes, Social Science & Medicine, 74, pp. 1854–1855. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.034
45. M.Lengwiler, (2008) Participatory approaches in science and technology—Historical origins and current practices in critical perspective, Science Technology & Human Values, 33, pp. 186–200. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311262
46. G.P.Martin, (2008) ‘Ordinary people only’: Knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare, Sociology in Health & Illness, 30, pp. 35–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x
47. G.P.Martin, (2012) Citizens, publics, others and their role in participatory processes: A commentary on Lehoux, Daudelin and Abelson, Social Science & Medicine, 74, pp. 1851–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.030
48. A.Mol,. (2006) De logica van het zorgen; Actieve patiënten en de grenzen van het kiezen (Amsterdam: Van Gennep).
49. T.Moreira, (2005) Diversity in clinical guidelines: The role of repertoires of evaluation, Social Science & Medicine, 60, pp. 1975–1985. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.062
50. T.Moreira, (2012) Health care standards and the politics of singularities, Science, Technology & Human Values, 37, pp. 307–331. doi: 10.1177/0162243911414921
51. E.Mykhalovskiy, (2003) Evidence-based medicine: Ambivalent reading and the clinical recontextualization of science, Health, 7, pp. 331–352.
52. N.Oudshoorn, and T.Pinch, (Eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
53. L.Prior, (2003) Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology, Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, pp. 41–57. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00339
54. A.Qaseem,, F.Forland,, F.Macbeth,, G.Ollenschlager,, S.Phillips,, P.van der Wees, and Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International, N. (2012) Guidelines International Network: Toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines, Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, pp. 525–531. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00009
55. I.Raats, (2009) Rol van patienten bij richtlijnontwikkeling [Role of patients in guideline development]. Presentation at ‘Werkconferentie richtlijnen en geneesmiddelen’ Coordinatiegroep geneesmiddelenbeleid, June 18.
56. C.J.Raats,, H.van Veenendaal,, M.M.Versluijs, and J.S.Burgers, (2008) A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines, Patient Education and Counseling, 73, pp. 413–417. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.038
57. V.Rabeharisoa, (2008) Social and political stakes of associative networks, coalitions, and collectives, in: M.Akrich, J.Nunes, F.Paterson and V.Rabeharisoa (Eds) The Dynamics of Patient Organizations in Europe, pp. 143–187 (Paris: Presses des Mines).
58. V.Rabeharisoa, and M.Callon, (2004) Patients and scientists in French muscular dystrophy research, in: S.Jasanoff (Ed) States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, pp. 142–160 (London: Routledge).
59. E.Richards, (1988) The politics of therapeutic evaluation—the Vitamin C and cancer controversy, Social Studies of Science, 18, pp. 653–701. doi: 10.1177/030631288018004004
60. W.A.Rogers, (2002) Evidence-based medicine in practice: Limiting or facilitating patient choice?, Health Expect, 5, pp. 95–103. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00168.x
61. E.Tambuyzer,, G.Pieters, and C.Van Audenhove, (2014) Patient involvement in mental health care: One size does not fit all, Health Expectations, 17, pp. 138–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00743.x
62. J.Thompson,, P.Bissell,, C.Cooper,, C.J.Armitage, and R.Barber, (2012) Credibility and the ‘professionalized’ lay expert: Reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research, Health, 16, pp. 602–618.
63. S.Timmermans, and M.Berg, (1997) Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols, Social Studies of Science, 27, pp. 273–305. doi: 10.1177/030631297027002003
64. S.Timmermans, and M.Berg,. (2003) The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
65. S.Timmermans, and S.Epstein, (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization, Annual Review of Sociology, 36, pp. 69–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
66. J.Q.Tritter, (2009) Revolution or evolution: The challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world, Health Expect, 12, pp. 275–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x
67. C.A.Umscheid, (2009) Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, pp. 988–990. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1055-0
68. H.M.Van de Bovenkamp,, K.J.Grit, and R.A.Bal,. (2008) Inventarisatie patiënten-participatie in onderzoek, kwaliteit en beleid. Rotterdam: Instituut Beleid en Management Gezondheidszorg. Available at http://oldwww.bmg.eur.nl/personal/r.bal/vd%20Bovenkamp%20et%20al%20-%202008%20-%20inventarisatie%20patientenparticipatie.pdf (Accessed 23 June 2014).
69. H.M.Van de Bovenkamp, and M.J.Trappenburg, (2009) Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development, Health Care Analysis, 17, pp. 198–216. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0099-3
70. H.M.Van de Bovenkamp, and T.Zuiderent-Jerak, (2013) An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: Exploring the potential for articulating patient knowledge in evidence-based epistemic settings, Health Expect. doi:10.1111/hex.12067.
71. T.Van der Weijden,, F.Legare,, A.Boivin,, J.S.Burgers,, H.van Veenendaal,, A.M.Stiggelbout,, M.Faber, and G.Elwyn, (2010) How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol, Implementation Science, 5. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-10.
72. T.Van der Weijden,, A.H.Pieterse,, M.S.Koelewijn-van Loon,, L.Knaapen,, F.Legare,, A.Boivin,, J.S.Burgers,, A.M.Stiggelbout,, M.Faber, and G.Elwyn, (2013) How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study, BMJ Quality Safety, 22, pp. 855–863. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001502
73. M.Van Oudheusden, and B.Laurent, (2013) Shifting and deepening engagements: Experimental normativity in public participation in science and technology, Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9, pp. 3–22.
74. H.Van Veenendaal,, G.C.Franx,, M.H.Grol,, J.van Vuuren,, M.Versluijs, and P.N.R.Dekhuyzen, (2004) Patiëntenparticipatie bij richtlijnontwikkeling. in: J.J.E.van Everdingen, J.S.Burgers and W.J.J.Assendelft (Eds) Evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling, pp. 48–62 (Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum).
75. A.Van Wersch, and M.Eccles, (2001) Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: Practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme, Quality Safety in Health Care, 10, pp. 10–16. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.10
76. S.Wait, and E.Nolte, (2006) Public involvement policies in health: Exploring their conceptual basis, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 1, pp. 149–162. doi: 10.1017/S174413310500112X
77. G.Weisz,, A.Cambrosio,, P.Keating,, L.Knaapen,, T.Schlich, and V.J.Tournay, (2007) The emergence of clinical practice guidelines, Milbank Quarterly, 85, pp. 691–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00505.x
78. B.Wynne, (1992) Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science, Public Understanding of Science, 1, pp. 281–304. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
79. R.Zeiss, and S.van Egmond, (2014) Dissolving decision making? Models and their roles in decision-making processes and policy at large, Science in Context, 27, pp. 631–657. doi: 10.1017/S0269889714000234
80. T.Zuiderent-Jerak, (2007) Preventing Implementation: Exploring Interventions with Standardization in Healthcare, Science as Culture, 16, pp. 311–329. doi: 10.1080/09505430701568719
81. T.Zuiderent-Jerak, and C.B.Jensen, (2007) Editorial introduction: Unpacking “intervention” in science and technology studies, Science as Culture, 16, pp. 227–235. doi: 10.1080/09505430701568552