How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol

Implementation Science

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  van der Weijden, Trudy ^a   Légaré, France ^b   Boivin, Antoine ^c   Burgers, Jako S ^d   van Veenendaal, Haske ^d   Stiggelbout, Anne M ^e   Faber, Marjan ^c   Elwyn, Glyn ^f  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO   (Netherlands)

^e LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^f CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77349115211     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-10     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Weijden T, van Veenendaal H, Timmermans DRM. Shared decision making in the Netherlands. Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung 2007, 101:241-6.
2. Elwyn G, Légaré F, Edwards A, Weijden T, May C. Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice. Implementation Science 2008, 3:57. 10.1186/1748-5908-3-57, 2631595, 19117509.
3. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Pat Educ Couns 2008, 73:526-35.
4. Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen SM, de Haes HCJM, Visser A, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM. Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?. Health Expect 2006, 9:333-42. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00413.x, 17083560.
5. Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: Directions for a new agency. 1990, National Academic Press, Washington.
6. Eddy DL. Rationing by patient choice. JAMA 1991, 265:105-8. 10.1001/jama.265.1.105, 1984107.
7. Gilmore A. Clinical practice guidelines: weapons for patients, or shields for MDs?. Can Med Ass J 1993, 148:429-31.
8. Nease RF, Owens DK. A method for estimating the cost-effectiveness of incorporating patient preferences into practice guidelines. Med Dec Making 1994, 14:382-92.
9. Gandjour A, Westenhofer J, With A, Fuchs C, Lauterbach KW. Development process of an evidence-based guideline for the treatment of obesity. Int J Qual Healthcare 2001, 13:325-32.
10. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006, 4:22. 10.1186/1478-4505-4-22, 1697808, 17147811.
11. McCormack JP, Loewen P. Adding 'value' to clinical practice guidelines. Can Fam Physician 2007, 53:1326-7. 1949258, 17872848.
12. Chong C, Chen I, Naglie C, Krahn M. Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?. Med Dec Making 2007, 27:E63-4.
13. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 2008, 300:436-8. 10.1001/jama.300.4.436, 18647988.
14. Shaneyfelt T, Centor R. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines. Go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009, 301:868-9. 10.1001/jama.2009.225, 19244197.
15. Boivin A, Légaré F, Gagnon MP. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perception of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. J Health Services Res Policy 2008, 13:79-84.
16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann H. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008, 336:924-6. 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD, 18436948.
17. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282:1458-65. 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458, 10535437.
18. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997, 2:112-21.
19. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: Evidence, models and interventions. Pat Educ Couns 2006, 61:319-41.
20. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: A narrative review. Pat Educ Couns 2006, 60:102-114.
21. Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Measuring patients' preferences for participating in healthcare decisions: avoiding invalid observations. Health Expect 2006, 4:305-6.
22. O'Connor AM. Using decision aids to help patients navigate the 'grey zone' of medical decision making. CAMJ 2007, 176:1597-8.
23. Protheroe J, Fahey T, Montgomery AA, Peters TJ. The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis. BMJ 2000, 320:1380-4. 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1380, 27382, 10818030.
24. Devereaux PJ, Anderson DR, Gardner MJ, Putnam W, Flowerdew GJ, Brownell BF, et al. Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study. BMJ 2001, 323:1218-22. 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1218, 59994, 11719412.
25. Alonso-Coello P, Montori VM, Sola I, Schünemann HJ, Devereaux PJ, Chareles C, Roura M, Diaz MG, Souto JC, Alonso R, Oliver S, Ruiz R, Coll-Vinent B, Diez AI, Gich I, Guyatt G. Values and preferences in oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, physicians' and patients' perspectives: protocol for a two-phase study. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:221. 10.1186/1472-6963-8-221, 2613147, 18954427.
26. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 2000, 50:892-9. 1313854, 11141876.
27. Preference Collaborative Review Group Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. BMJ 2008, 337:a1864. 10.1136/bmj.a1864, 2659956, 18977792, Preference Collaborative Review Group.
28. Boivin A, Légaré F, Lehoux P. Decision technologies as normative instruments: exposing the values within. Pat Educ Couns 2008, 59:426-30.
29. Joosten EA, Defuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health Status. Psychother Psychosom 2008, 77:219-26. 10.1159/000126073, 18418028.
30. Rogers WA. Evidence-based medicine in practice: Limiting or facilitating patient choice?. Health Expectations 2002, 5:95-103. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00168.x, 12031050.
31. Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM. Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. Br J Cancer 2008, 99:875-82. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604611, 2538766, 18781148.
32. Raats CJ, van Veenendaal H, Versluijs MM, Burgers JS. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:413-7. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.038, 18768285.
33. Owens D. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine 1998, 23:1073-9. 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00023, 9589550.
34. Schofield M. Patient-provider agreement on guidelines for preparation for breast cancer treatment. Behavorial Medicine 1997, 23:36-45.
35. Verkerk K, Van Veenendaal H, Severens JL, Hendriks EJM, Burgers JS. Considered judgement in evidence-based guideline development. Int J Qual Healthcare 2006, 18:365-9.
36. Légaré F, Boivin A, Weijden T, Packenham C, Tapp S, Burgers J. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol. Implem Science 2009, 4:30.
37. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers F, Gracia J, James M, Knaapen L, Marshall C, Sakala C, Sanger S, Thomas V, Weijden T, Grol R, Burgers JS, . on behalf of G-I-N Public Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Accepted Qual Saf Healthcare on behalf of G-I-N Public.
38. Kirwan JR, Minnock P, Adebajo A, Bresnihan B, Choy E, de Wit M, Hazes M, Richards P, Saag K, Suarez-Almazor M, Wells G, Hewlett S. Patient perspective: fatigue as a recommended patient centered outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2007, 34:1174-7.
39. Hoes JN, Jacobs JW, Boers M, Boumpas D, Buttgereit F, Caeyers N, Choy EH, Cutolo M, Da Silva JA, Esselens G, Guillevin L, Hafstrom I, Kirwan JR, Rovensky J, Russell A, Saag KG, Svensson B, Westhovens R, Zeidler H, Bijlsma JW. EULAR evidence-based recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66:1560-7. 10.1136/ard.2007.072157, 17660219.
40. Coulter A. Whatever happened to shared decision-making. Health Expect 2002, 5:185-6. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00190.x, 12199657.
41. Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Healthcare Anal 2009, 17:198-216.
42. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999, 49:651-661. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00145-8, 10452420.
43. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making in healthcare. Achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2009, Oxford University Press, 2.
44. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving patient care. The implementation of change in clinical practice 2005, 45. Elsevier Publisher.
45. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, In't Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998, 317:858-61. 31096, 9748183.
46. Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Mäkelä M, Zaat J, . AGREE Collaboration Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18. clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Healthcare 2003, 15:31-45. AGREE Collaboration.
47. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T. International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006, 333:417. 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE, 1553508, 16908462.
48. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, Schünemann HJ. GRADE: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008, 336:1049-51. 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE, 18467413.
49. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Research 2005, 15:1277-88.
50. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996, 312:71-2. 2349778, 8555924.
51. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Pat Educ Couns 2000, 39:17-25.
52. Pollock K. Concordance in medical consultations. A critical review. 2005, Radcliffe Publ. Abingdon UK.
53. Bastian H. Raising the standard: practice guidelines and consumer participation. Int J Qual Healthcare 1996, 8:485-90.
54. Boivin A, Green J, Meulen J, Légaré F, Nolte E. Why consider patients' preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developers. Med Care 2009, 47:908-15. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a81158, 19543120.
55. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid disease: implications of pay for performance. JAMA 2005, 294:716-24. 10.1001/jama.294.6.716, 16091574.
56. Baratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: The challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into healthcare. Pat Educ Couns 2008, 73:407-12.
57. Brennan PF, Strombom I. Improving healthcare by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Ass 1998, 5:257-62.
58. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Eccles M, Rovner D. Decision analysis in patient care. Lancet 2001, 358:571-4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05709-9, 11520546.
59. McInnes E, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Luker K, Duff LA. The development of a national guideline on the management of leg ulcers. J Clin Nursing 2000, 9:208-17.
60. Oppenheim PI, Sotiropoulos G, Baraff LJ. Incorporating patient preferences into practice guidelines: management of children with fever without source. Ann Emergency Med 1994, 24:836-41.
61. Latoszek-Berendsen A, Talmon J, de Clercq P, Hasman A. With good intentions. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76S:S440-6.
62. Schünemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, Buist S, MacNee W, Rabe KF, Hefner J. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of CPOD. Lancet 2009, 373:774-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61347-1, 18835641.
63. Elwyn G, O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Newcombe RG, Politi M, Durand MA, Drake E, Joseph-Williams N, Khangura S, Saarimaki A, Sivell S, Stiel M, Bernstein SJ, Col N, Coulter A, Eden K, Härter M, Rovner MH, Moumjid N, Stacey D, Thomson R, Whelan T, Weijden T, Edwards A. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One 2009, 4(3):e4705. Epub 2009 Mar 4, 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705, 2649534, 19259269.
64. O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Dec Mak 2007, 27:554-74.
65. Saltman DC. Guidelines for every person. J Eval Clin Pract 1998, 4:1-9. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1998.t01-1-00001.x, 9524908.