Pragmatic evidence and textual arrangements: A case study of French clinical cancer guidelines

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 685-692

  Knaapen, Loes ^a   Cazeneuve, Hervé ^b   Cambrosio, Alberto ^a   Castel, Patrick ^c   Fervers, Beatrice ^d  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^c Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; Dispositif; Evidence based medicine; France; Oncology; Pragmatic sociology; Regulation

Indexed keywords

CANCER; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH WORKER; PUBLIC HEALTH; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;

ARTICLE; CANCER RESEARCH; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSENSUS; ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH; FRANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PUBLICATION;

DISSENT AND DISPUTES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FRANCE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NEOPLASMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

FRANCE;

EID: 77955086792     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2003, 12:18-23. AGREE Collaboration.
2. Akrich M. The de-scription of technical objects. Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change 1992, 205-224. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W.E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.).
3. Allen D. From boundary concept to boundary object: the practice and politics of care pathway development. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 69:354-361.
4. Berg M., Horstman K., Plass S., van Heusden M. Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity. Standardisation and the professionalisation of insurance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness 2000, 22:765-791.
5. Boltanski L., Thévenot L. The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory 1999, 2:359-378.
6. Bourret P., Rabeharisoa V. Le jugement et la décision médicale en situation de forte incertitude: l'exemple de deux pratiques cliniques à l'épreuve de la génétique. Sciences Sociales et Santé 2008, 26:33-66.
7. Cambrosio A., Keating P., Schlich T., Weisz G. Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 63:189-199.
8. Castel, P. (2002). Normaliser les pratiques, organizer les médecins: la qualité comme stratégie de changement. Le cas des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Doctoral Thesis. Institut d'Études politiques de Paris (Sociologie).
9. Castel P. What's behind a guideline? Authority, competition and collaboration in the French oncology sector. Social Studies of Science 2009, 39:743-764.
10. Castel P., Merle I. Quand les normes de pratiques deviennent une ressource pour les médecins. Sociologie Du Travail 2002, 44:337-355.
11. Crozier M. The bureaucratic phenomenon 1964, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Dosquet P., Goldberg J., Matillon Y. Comment élaborer des recommandations de pratique clinique?. Bulletin Du Cancer 1995, 82:754-760.
13. EBM Working Group Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of American Medical Association 1992, 268:2420-2425.
14. Eccles M., Clapp Z., Grimshaw J., Adams P.C., Higgins B., Purves I., et al. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development. British Medical Journal 1996, 312:760-762.
15. Eddy D. Practice policies: guidelines for methods. Journal of American Medical Association 1990, 263:839-841.
16. Eisenberg J.M. Globalize the evidence, localize the decision: evidence-based medicine and international diversity. Health Affairs 2002, 21:166-168.
17. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Rapport d'activité 1994, FNCLCC, Paris.
18. Feldman M.S., Pentland B.T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 2003, 48:94-118.
19. Fervers B., Burgers J.S., Haugh M.C., Latreille J., Mlika-Cabanne N., Paquet L., et al. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006, 18:167-176.
20. Fervers B., Hardy J., Philip T. Standards, Options and Recommendations. Clinical Practice Guidelines for cancer care from the French National Federation of Cancer Centres (FNCLCC). British Journal of Cancer 2001, 84(Suppl. 2):1-92.
21. Foucault M. Dits et écrits 1954-1988 1994, Vol. III. 1976-1979, Gallimard, Paris.
22. Fox R. Medical uncertainty revisited. Handbook of social studies in health and medicine 2003, 409-425. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. G.L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, S.C. Scrimshaw (Eds.).
23. GRADE working group Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. BMC Health Services Research 2004, 4:38.
24. Greene J. Prescribing by numbers. Drugs and the definition of disease 2007, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
25. Hutchings A., Raine R. A systematic review of factors affecting the judgments produced by formal consensus development methods in health care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2006, 11:172-179.
26. Latour B. Drawing things together. Representation in scientific practice 1990, 19-68. MIT Press, Cambridge. M. Lynch, S. Woolgar (Eds.).
27. Michie S., Lester K. Words matter: increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2005, 14:367-370.
28. Moreira T. Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. Social Science & Medicine 2005, 60:1975-1985.
29. Mykhalovskiy E., Weir L. The problem of evidence-based medicine: directions for social science. Social Science & Medicine 2004, 59:1059-1069.
30. Pagliari C., Grimshaw J. Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2002, 8:145-153.
31. Pinell P. The fight against cancer: France 1890-1940 2002, Routledge, London.
32. Reynaud J.D., Richebé N. Règles, conventions et valeurs. Plaidoyer pour la normativité ordinaire. Revue Française De Sociologie 2007, 48(1):3-36.
33. Timmermans S., Berg M. The gold standard: A challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care 2003, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
34. Weisz G., Cambrosio A., Keating P., Knaapen L., Schlich T., Tournay V.J. The emergence of clinical practice guidelines. Milbank Quarterly 2007, 85:691-727.