Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 988-990

  Umscheid, Craig A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 77950344587     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1055-0     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Barry MJ. Involving patients in medical decisions: how can physicians do better? JAMA. 1999;282(24): 2356-7. (Pubitemid 30013070)
2. Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24): 2313-20. (Pubitemid 30013062)
3. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up - and there's no going back. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1999;319(7212):719-20.
4. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:16.
5. Hanson JL. Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious? Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13): 1368-70. (Pubitemid 352008417)
6. Muir Gray JA. Evidence-based healthcare. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2001. 11.
7. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4): 436-8. (Pubitemid 352040257)
8. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8): 868-9.
9. Chong CAKY, Chen I, Naglie G, Krahn MD. How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med. 2009; doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0987-8
10. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(1): 18-23.
11. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281(20): 1900-5. (Pubitemid 29242803)
12. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348 (26): 2635-45. (Pubitemid 36741592)
13. Feldman RD, Zou GY, Vandervoort MK, Wong CJ, Nelson SA, Feagan BG. A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Hypertension. 2009;53 (4): 646-53.
14. Shekelle P, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. When should clinical guidelines be updated? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2001;323(7305):155-7. (Pubitemid 32678395)
15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650): 924-6. (Pubitemid 351632017)
16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652): 1049-51.
17. Strech D, Tilburt J. Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(6): 521-4. (Pubitemid 351615535)
18. Sniderman AD, Furberg CD. Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA. 2009;301(4): 429-31.