Classification of human errors in grounding and collision accidents using the TRACEr taxonomy

Safety Science

Volumn 86, Issue , 2016, Pages 245-257

  Graziano, A ^a   Teixeira, A P ^a   Guedes Soares, C ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

CASMET; Grounding and collision accidents; Human and organisational factors; Taxonomy for coding accidents; Technique for the Retrospective and predictive Analysis of Cognitive Errors; TRACEr

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CODING ERRORS; SHIPS; TAXONOMIES;

CASMET; COGNITIVE ERROR; COLLISION ACCIDENTS; HUMAN AND ORGANISATIONAL FACTORS; TRACER;

ERRORS;

ACTION; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DEVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ERROR; FATIGUE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; OPERATOR; ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHIP; STRESS; TAXONOMY; TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT; TECHNIQUE FOR THE RETROSPECTIVE AND PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE ERROR; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VIOLATION;

EID: 84960483779     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.026     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akhtar M.J., Utne I.B. Human fatigue's effect on the risk of maritime groundings - a Bayesian Network modelling approach. Saf. Sci. 2014, 62:427-440.
2. Antão P., Guedes Soares C. Organisation of Databases of Accident Data. Risk Analysis III 2002, 395-403. WitPress, Southampton, Boston, UK.
3. Antão P., Teixeira A.P., Guedes Soares C. Integration of human factors into the ship design process. Developments in Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources 2014, 443-452. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK. C. Guedes Soares, F. Lopez Pena (Eds.).
4. Asami M., Kaneko F. Development of vessel collision model based on Naturalistic Decision Making model. Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures 2013, 49-56. Taylor & Francis & Group, London, UK. J. Amdahl, S. Ehlers, B.J. Leira (Eds.).
5. Caridis, P., 1999. Casualty analysis methodology for maritime operations. Final report of the European Research project CASMET, 4th RTD Framework Programme, Project no. WA-97-SC.2085.
6. Chen S.-T., Wall A., Davies P., Yang Z., Wang J., Chou Y.-H. A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA). Saf. Sci. 2013, 60:105-114.
7. Correia, P., 2010. European Marine Casualty Information Platform a common EU taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships (ICCGS), Espoo, Finland, June 14-16, 2010, pp. 13-17.
8. EC, 2009. Establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Council Directive 1999/35/EC and Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2009/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009.
9. Embrey, D.E., 1986. SHERPA: a systematic human error reduction and prediction approach. Paper Presented at the International Topical Meeting on Advances in Human Factors in Nuclear Power Systems. Knoxville, Tennessee.
10. Endsley M.R., Jones D.G. Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centred Design 2004, Taylor & Francis Group, New York. second ed.
11. Graziano A., Teixeira A.P., Guedes Soares C. Application of TRACEr taxonomy for the codification of grounding and collision accidents. Maritime Technology and Engineering 2015, 215-226. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK. C. Guedes Soares, T.A. Santos (Eds.).
12. Guedes Soares C., Teixeira A.P. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 2001, 74:299-309.
13. Guedes Soares, C., Teixeira, A.P., Antão P., 2000. Accounting for human factors in the analysis of maritime accidents. In: Cottam, M., Harvey, D., Pape, R., Tait, J. (Eds.), Foresight and Precaution, Rotterdam, Balkema, pp. 521-528.
14. Guldenmund F.W. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf. Sci. 2000, 34:215-257.
15. Hendrick K., Benner L. Investigating Accident with STEP 1996, CRC Press.
16. Hofmann, S., Schröder-Hinrichs, J.U., 2013. CyClaDes Task 1.2 Incident and accident analysis. Document ID Code: CY112.00.02.041.041, WMU.
17. Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) 1998, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
18. Hollnagel E. Barriers and Accident Prevention 2004, Ashgate, Hampshire/Burlington.
19. Hollnagel E. Human reliability assessment in context. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2005, 37(2):159-166.
20. Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management 2014, Farnham, UK, Ashgate.
21. IMO, 1999. Guidelines for Voyage Planning, Resolution A.893(21), International Maritime Organization.
22. IMO, 2006. Adoption for the revised performance standards for Electronic Chart Display Systems ECDIS, Resolution MSC.232(82), International Maritime Organization.
23. IMO, 2009. Adoption of amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amend, Resolution MSC.282(86). International Maritime Organization.
24. ISO, 2003. Ships and marine technology - ECS databases - Content, quality, updating and testing, ISO 19379:2003, International Organization for Standardization.
25. Kaneko F. An improvement on a method for estimating number of collision candidates between ships. Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures 2013, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 27-37.
26. Kirwan B. A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment 1994, Taylor & Francis, London.
27. Kontogiannis T., Malakis S. A proactive approach to human error detection and identification in aviation and air traffic control. Saf. Sci. 2009, 47(5):693-706.
28. Kristiansen, S., Koster, E., Schmidt, W.F., Olofsson, M., Guedes Soares, C., Caridis, P., 1999. A new methodology for marine casualty analysis accounting for human and organisational factors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning from Marine Incidents, London, 20-21 October 1999, paper 14, pp. 1-14 (RA).
29. Kum S., Sahin B. A root cause analysis for Arctic Marine accidents from 1993 to 2011. Saf. Sci. 2015, 74:206-220.
30. Lutzhoft M.H., Dekker S.W.A. On your watch: automation on the bridge. J. Navigat. 2002, 55(1):83-96.
31. Mazaheri A., Montewka J., Kujala P. Modeling the risk of ship grounding-a literature review from a risk management perspective. WMU J. Marit. Affairs 2013, 269-297. 10.1007/s13437-013-0056-3.
32. Mazaheri A., Montewka J., Nisula J., Kujala P. Usability of accident and incident reports for evidence-based risk modeling - a case study on ship grounding reports. Saf. Sci. 2015, 76:202-214.
33. Okstad E., Jersin E., Tinmannsvik R.K. Accident investigation in the Norwegian petroleum industry - common features and future challenges. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50(6):1408-1414.
34. Pedersen P.T. Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures. Mar. Struct. 2010, 23:241-262.
35. Reason J. Human Error 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Schröder-Hinrichs J.U., Hollnagel E., Baldauf M. From Titanic to Costa Concordia - a century of lessons not learned. WMU J. Marit. Affairs 2012, 11:151-167.
37. Schröder-Hinrichs J.U., Hollnagel E., Baldauf M., Hofmann S., Kataria A. Maritime Human factors and IMO. Marit. Policy Manage.: the flagship journal of international shipping and port research 2013, 40(3):243-260.
38. Shappell S.A., Wiegmann D.A. A human error approach to accident investigation: the taxonomy of unsafe operations. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 1997, 7(4):269-291.
39. Shappell, S.A., Wiegmann, D.A., 2000. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS (No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7). FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, Oklahoma City.
40. Shorrock S.T., Kirwan B. Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. Appl. Ergon. 2002, 33:319-336.
41. Shorrock S.T. Errors of memory in air traffic control. Saf. Sci. 2005, 43(8):571-588.
42. Shorrock S.T. Errors of perception in air traffic control. Saf. Sci. 2007, 45(8):890-904.
43. Stanton N.A., Chambers P.R.G., Piggott J. Situational awareness and safety. Saf. Sci. 2001, 39(3):189-204.
44. Steen R., Aven T. A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49(2):292-297.
45. Strauch B. Can we examine safety culture in accident investigations, or should we?. Saf. Sci. 2015, 77:102-111.
46. Wickens C.D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance 1992, Harper Collins, New York. second ed.