Sympatric speciation in structureless environments Theories and models

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Getz, Wayne M ^a,b   Salter, Richard ^c   Seidel, Dana Paige ^a   Van Hooft, Pim ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^c OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent based models; Disruptive selection; Foraging guilds; Genetic algorithms; Magic traits

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; FITNESS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GENE FLOW; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GUILD; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MATE CHOICE; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SYMPATRY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SYMPATRY;

EID: 84960377847     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0617-0     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bolnick DI, Fitzpatrick BM. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2007;38:459-87. doi: 10.1146/Annurev.Ecolsys.38.091206.095804.
2. Forbes AA, Powell THQ, Stelinski LL, Smith JJ, Feder JL. Sequential sympatric speciation across trophic levels. Science. 2009;323(5915):776-9. doi: 10.1126/Science.1166981.
3. Bast F, Kubota S, Okuda K. Phylogeographic assessment of panmictic Monostroma species from Kuroshio Coast, Japan, reveals sympatric speciation. J Appl Phycol. 2014:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10811-014-0452-x.
4. Barluenga M, Stolting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature. 2006;439(7077):719-23. doi: 10.1038/Nature04325.
5. Martin CH, Cutler JS, Friel JP, Touokong CD, Coop G, Wainwright PC. Complex histories of repeated gene flow in Cameroon crater lake cichlids cast doubt on one of the clearest examples of sympatric speciation. Evolution. 2015;69(6):1406-22. doi: 10.1111/Evo.12674.
6. Grant BR, Grant PR. Darwin finches-population variation and sympatric speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76(5):2359-63. doi: 10.1073/Pnas.76.5.2359.
7. Gavrilets S. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton, N.J.; Oxford: Princeton University Press; 2004.
8. Servedio MR, Kopp M. Sexual selection and magic traits in speciation with gene flow. Curr Zool. 2012;58(3):510-6.
9. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P. Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare? Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26(8):389-97. doi: 10.1016/J.Tree.2011.04.005.
10. Thibert-Plante X, Gavrilets S. Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation. Ecol Lett. 2013;16(8):1004-13. doi: 10.1111/Ele.12131.
11. Podos J, Dybboe R, Ole Jensen M. Ecological speciation in Darwin's finches: parsing the effects of magic traits. Curr Zool. 2013;59(1):8-19.
12. Hepper PG. Kin recognition. Cambridge: CUP; 1991.
13. Getz WM, Kaitala V. Ecogenetic models, competition, and heteropatry. Theor Popul Biol. 1989;36(1):34-58.
14. Norrström N, Getz WM, Holmgren NMA. Selection against accumulating mutations in niche-preference genes can drive speciation. Plos One. 2011;6(12), e29487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029487.
15. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999;400(6742):354-7. doi: 10.1038/22521.
16. Levin SA. Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of competitive exclusion principle. Am Nat. 1970;104(939):413. doi: 10.1086/282676.
17. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigne V. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat. 2002;159:S22-35. doi: 10.1086/338370.
18. DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM. Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2005;36:147-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152644.
19. Getz WM, Salter RM, Lyons AJ, Sippl-Swezey N. Panmictic and clonal evolution on a single patchy resource produces polymorphic foraging guilds. Plos One. 2015;10(10), e0133732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133732.
20. Corl A, Davis AR, Kuchta SR, Sinervo B. Selective loss of polymorphic mating types is associated with rapid phenotypic evolution during morphic speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(9):4254-9. doi: 10.1073/Pnas.0909480107.
21. Kusche H, Elmer KR, Meyer A. Sympatric ecological divergence associated with a color polymorphism. BMC Biol. 2015;13. doi: 10.1186/S12915-015-0192-7
22. Sherborne AL, Thom MD, Paterson S, Jury F, Ollier WER, Stockley P, et al. The genetic basis of inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Curr Biol. 2007;17(23):2061-6. doi: 10.1016/J.Cub.2007.10.041.
23. Jiang YX, Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M. Assortative mating in animals. Am Nat. 2013;181(6):E125-38. doi: 10.1086/670160.
24. Nowak MA, Sigmund K. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science. 2004;303(5659):793-9. doi: 10.1126/Science.1093411.
25. Zhou D, Wu B, Ge H. Evolutionary stability and quasi-stationary strategy in stochastic evolutionary game dynamics. J Theor Biol. 2010;264(3):874-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.018.
26. Sasaki A, Dieckmann U. Oligomorphic dynamics for analyzing the quantitative genetics of adaptive speciation. J Math Biol. 2011;63(4):601-35. doi: 10.1007/S00285-010-0380-6.
27. Beddington JR. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J Anim Ecol. 1975;44:331-40.
28. DeAngelis DL, Goldstein RA, Oneill RV. Model for trophic interaction. Ecology. 1975;56:881-92.
29. Getz WM. Biomass transformation webs provide a unified approach to consumer-resource modelling. Ecol Lett. 2011;14(2):113-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01566.x.
30. Getz W. A hypothesis regarding the abruptness of density dependence and the growth rate of populations. Ecology. 1996;77:2014-26.
31. Ward AJW, Webster MM, Hart PJB. Intraspecific food competition in fishes. Fish Fish. 2006;7(4):231-61. doi: 10.1111/J.1467-2979.2006.00224.X.
32. Chow SS, Wilke CO, Ofria C, Lenski RE, Adami C. Adaptive radiation from resource competition in digital organisms. Science. 2004;305(5680):84-6. doi: 10.1126/Science.1096307.
33. Haller BC, Mazzucco R, Dieckmann U. Evolutionary branching in complex landscapes. Am Nat. 2013;182(4):E127-41. doi: 10.1086/671907.
34. Merrill RM, Wallbank RWR, Bull V, Salazar PCA, Mallet J, Stevens M, et al. Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2012;279(1749):4907-13. doi: 10.1098/Rspb.2012.1968.
35. Benkman CW. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution. 2003;57(5):1176-81.
36. Hynes DP, Miller EH. Vocal distinctiveness of the Red Crossbill (Loxia curvirostra) on the island of Newfoundland, Canada. Auk. 2014;131(3):421-33. doi: 10.1642/auk-13-224.1.
37. Kraus RHS, Kerstens HHD, van Hooft P, Megens H-J, Elmberg J, Tsvey A et al. Widespread horizontal genomic exchange does not erode species barriers among sympatric ducks. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-45.
38. Korol A, Rashkovetsky E, Iliadi K, Nevo E. Drosophila flies in "Evolution Canyon" as a model for incipient sympatric speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(48):18184-9.
39. Page RE, Robinson GE, Britton DS, Fondrk MK. Genotypic Variability for rates of behavioral-development in worker honeybees (Apis-Mellifera L). Behav Ecol. 1992;3(2):173-80. doi: 10.1093/Beheco/3.2.173.
40. Searle KR, Hunt LP, Gordon IJ. Individualistic herds: individual variation in herbivore foraging behavior and application to rangeland management. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2010;122(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/J.Applanim.2009.10.005.
41. Torr SJ, Mangwiro TNC, Hall DR. The effects of host physiology on the attraction of tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) and Stomoxys (Diptera: Muscidae) to cattle. B Entomol Res. 2006;96(1):71-84. doi: 10.1079/Ber2005404.
42. Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM. Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: Influences of context, age, and individuality. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111(3):1465-74. doi: 10.1121/1.1433807.
43. Hauber ME, Sherman PW. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24(10):609-16. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01916-0.
44. Jennions MD, Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev. 1997;72(2):283-327. doi: 10.1017/S0006323196005014.
45. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2003;270(1515):653-64. doi: 10.1098/Rspb.2002.2235.
46. Rangassamy M, Dalmas M, Feron C, Gouat P, Rodel HG. Similarity of personalities speeds up reproduction in pairs of a monogamous rodent. Anim Behav. 2015;103:7-15. doi: 10.1016/J.Anbehav.2015.02.007.
47. David M, Pinxten R, Martens T, Eens M. Exploration behavior and parental effort in wild great tits: partners matter. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69(7):1085-95. doi: 10.1007/S00265-015-1921-1.
48. Gabriel PO, Black JM. Behavioural syndromes, partner compatibility and reproductive performance in Steller's Jays. Ethology. 2012;118(1):76-86. doi: 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2011.01990.X.
49. Debarre F. Refining the conditions for sympatric ecological speciation. J Evolution Biol. 2012;25(12):2651-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02621.x.
50. Thibert-Plante X, Hendry AP. Factors influencing progress toward sympatric speciation. J Evolution Biol. 2011;24(10):2186-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02348.x.
51. Salter RM. Nova: a modern platform for system dynamics, spatial, and agent-based modeling. Procedia Computer Science. 2013;18:1784-93.
52. Zhou JJ, Lange K, Papp JC, Sinsheimer JS. A heterozygote-homozygote test of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17(11):1495-500. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.57.