Sexual selection and magic traits in speciation with gene flow

Current Zoology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 510-516

  Servedio, Maria R ^a   Kopp, Michael ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Divergent selection; Ecological selection; Mating cues; Non random mating; Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873678749     PISSN: 16745507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/58.3.510     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arnegard ME, Kondrashov AS, 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution 58: 222-237.
2. Arnqvist G, Edvarrdsson M, Friberg U, Nilsson T, 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10460-10464.
3. Barraclough TG, Harvey PH, Nee S, 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 259: 211-215.
4. Bolnick DI, Fitzpatrick BM, 2007. Sympatric speciation: Models and empirical evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 459-487.
5. Boncoraglio G, Saino N, 2007. Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct. Ecol. 21: 134-142.
6. Boughman JW, 2002. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 571-577.
7. Bürger R, Schneider KA, 2006. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating. Am. Nat. 167: 190-205.
8. Bürger R, Schneider KA, Willendsdorfer M, 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60: 2185-2206.
9. Endler JA, 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: S125-S153.
10. Gage MJG, Parker GA, Nylin S, Wiklund C, 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 269: 2309-2316.
11. Gavrilets S, 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J, 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
13. Kirkpatrick M, Nuismer SL, 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 271: 687-693.
14. Labonne J, Hendry AP, 2010. Natural and sexual selection giveth and taketh away reproductive barriers: models of population divergence in guppies. Am. Nat 176: 26-39.
15. Lande R, 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
16. Maan ME, Seehausen O, 2011. Ecology, sexual selection, and speciation. Ecol. Lett. 14: 591-602.
17. Mallet J, 2008. Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: Empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 363: 2971-2986.
18. Mallet J, Barton NH, 1989. Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
19. Matessi C, Gimelfarb A, Gavrilets S, 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: How far does it go? Selection 2: 41-64.
20. Mitra S, Landel H, Pruett-Jones S, 1996. Species richness covaries with mating system in birds. Auk 113: 544-551.
21. Møller AP, Cuervo JJ, 1998. Speciation and feather ornamentation in brids. Evolution 52: 859-69.
22. Morrow EH, Pitcher TE, Arnqvist G, 2003. No evidence that sexual selection as an 'engine of speciation' in birds. Ecol. Lett. 6: 228-34.
23. Morrow EH, Pitcher TE, Arnqvist G, 2003. No evidence that sexual selection as an 'engine of speciation' in birds. Erratum. Ecol. Lett. 6: 1038.
24. Nosil P, 2008. Speciation with gene flow could be common. Mol. Ecol. 17: 2103-2106.
25. Nosil P, Schluter D, 2011. The genes underlying the process of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 160-167.
26. O'Donald P, 1960. Assortative mating in a population in which two alleles are segregating. Heredity 15: 389-396.
27. Otto SP, Servedio MR, Nuismer SL, 2008. Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics 179: 2091-2112.
28. Owens IPF, Bennett PM, Harvey PH, 1999. Species richness among birds: Body size, life history, sexual selection or ecology? Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 266: 933-939.
29. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T, 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
30. Pennings PS, Kopp M, Meszena G, Dieckmann U, Hermisson J, 2008. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. Am. Nat. 17: E44-E71.
31. Ritchie MG, 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 79-102.
32. Samdja C, Butlin RK, 2011. A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 20: 5123-5140.
33. Schneider KA, 2005. Competitive divergence in non-random mating populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 68: 105-118.
34. Schneider KA, Bürger R, 2006. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? J. Evol. Biol. 19: 570-598.
35. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame A, Nosil P, 2011. Magic traits: 'Magic' but not rare?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 389-397.
36. van Doorn GS, Edelaar P, Weissing FJ, 2009. On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 326: 1704-1707.
37. van Doorn GS, Weissing FJ, 2001. Ecological versus sexual models of sympatric speciation: A synthesis. Selection 2: 17-40.
38. van Doorn GS, Dieckmann U, Wessing FJ, 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: A critical reevaluation. Am. Nat. 163: 709-725.
39. Weissing FJ, Edelaar P, van Doorn GS, 2011. Adaptive speciation theory: A conceptual review. Beh. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 461-480.