Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory

Digital Technologies in the Lives of Young People

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 81-96

  Selwyn, Neil ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960265333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Agalianos, A., Whitty, G. & Noss, R. (2006) The social shaping of Logo, Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 241-267.
2. Amin, A. & Thrift, N. (2005) What’s left? Just the future, Antipode, 37, 220-238.
3. Anderson, T. (2008) The theory and practice of online learning (2nd edn.) (Athabasca, AU Press).
4. Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. (eds) (2006) Domestication of media and technology (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
5. Bigum, C. (2001) Actor-network theory and online university teaching: translation versus diffusion, in: B. Knight & L. Rowan (eds) Researching futures oriented pedagogy (Queensland, Post Pressed).
6. Bijker, W. (1995) Of bicycles, Bakelites and bulbs (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
7. Bijker, W. & Law, J. (1992) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
8. Bijker, W., Hughes, T. & Pinch, T. (eds) (1987) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
9. Bolter, J. & Grusin, R. (1999) Remediation: understanding new media (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
10. Caron, A. & Caronia, L. (2001) Active users and active objects: the mutual construction of families and communication technologies, Convergence, 7(3), 38-61.
11. Castells, M. (2000) Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society, British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5-24.
12. Chandler, D. (1995) Technological (or media) determinism. Available online at: www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tecdet.html.
13. Clegg, S. (2001) Theorising the machine: gender, education and computing, Gender and Education, 13(3), 307-324.
14. Cockfield, A. (2010) Individual autonomy, law, and technology: should soft determinism guide legal analysis? Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 30(1), 4-8.
15. Dutton, W., Cheong, P. & Park, N. (2004) The social shaping of a virtual learning environment: the case of a university-wide course management system, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(1), 69-80.
16. Edwards, P. (1996) The closed world: computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
17. Fairclough, N., Jessop, R. & Sayer, A. (2002) Critical realism and semiosis, Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 2-10.
18. Finnegan, R (1975) Communication and technology (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
19. Fox, S. (2005) An actor-network critique of community in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 95-110.
20. Goodfellow, R. (2005) Virtuality and the shaping of educational communities, Education, Communication & Information, 5(2), 113-129.
21. Greener, I. & Perriton, L. (2005) The political economy of networked learning communities in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 67-79.
22. Grint, K. & Woolgar, S. (1992) Computers, guns, and roses: what’s social about being shot? Science Technology & Human Values, 17, 366-380.
23. Grint, K. & Woolgar, S. (1997) The machine at work (Cambridge, Polity).
24. Habib, L. (2005) Domestication of learning environments in an institution of higher education. Paper presented at the 33rd Congress of the Nordic Educational Research Association, Oslo, 10-12 March.
25. Henwood, F. (2000) From the woman question in technology to the technology question in feminism: rethinking gender equality in IT education, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 7(2), 209-227.
26. Hutchby, I. (2001) Technologies, texts, and affordances, Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
27. Hutchby, I. (2003) Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediated interaction: a response to Brian Rappert, Sociology, 37(8), 581-589.
28. Kling, R. (1992) When gunfire shatters bone: reducing sociotechnical systems to social relationships, Science Technology & Human Values, 17, 381-385.
29. Lally, E. (2002) At home with computers (Oxford, Berg).
30. Latour, B. (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
31. Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
32. Law, J. (1987) Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion, in: W. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
33. MacKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (eds) (1985) The social shaping of technology: how the refrigerator got its hum (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
34. Martin, B. (1996) Technological determinism revisited, Metascience, 9, 158-160.
35. Mingers, J. (2004) Realising information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems, Information and Organization, 14(2), 87-103.
36. Monahan, T. (2005) Globalization, technological change, and public education (London, Routledge).
37. Mutch, A. (2010) Technology, organization, and structure—a morphogenetic approach, Organisation Science, 21(2), 507-520.
38. Noble, D. (2002) Digital diploma mills (New York, New York University Press).
39. Norman, D. (1999) Affordances, conventions and design, Interactions 6(3), 38-43.
40. Nye, D. (2007) Technology matters: questions to live with (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
41. Pfaffenberger, B. (1992) Technological dramas, Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(3), 282-312.
42. Pinch, T. & Bijker, W. (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other, Social Studies of Science 14, 399-441.
43. Potts, J. (2008) Who’s afraid of technological determinism? Another look at medium theory, Fibreculture. Available online at: http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue12/issue12_potts.html.
44. Rappert, B. (2003) Technologies, texts and possibilities: a reply to Hutchby, Sociology, 37(8), 565-580.
45. Reid, C. (2009) Technology-loving Luddites? Declining participation in high school computing studies in Australia, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(3), 289-302.
46. Rogers, E. (1983) Diffusion of innovations (New York, Free Press).
47. Rosser, S. (2005) Through the lenses of feminist theory: focus on women and information technology, Frontiers: a Journal of Women Studies, 26(1), 1-23.
48. Schiller, H. (1995) Information inequality: the deepening social crisis in America (New York, Routledge).
49. Schwartz Cowan, R. (1987) The consumption junction, in: W. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
50. Selwyn, N. (2012) Rethinking education in the digital age, in: N. Prior & K. Orton-Johnson (eds) Rethinking sociology in the digital age (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
51. Shirky, C. (2008) Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations (London, Allen Lane).
52. Silverstone, R. (1993) Time, information and communication technologies and the household, Time and Society, 2(3), 283-311.
53. Silverstone, R. & Hirsch, E. (1992) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces (Routledge, London).
54. Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E. & Morley, D. (1992) Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household, in: R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (eds) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces (Routledge, London).
55. Smith, M. L. (2006) Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: critical realism and information systems research, Information and Organization, 16(3), 191-211.
56. Smith, M. R. (1994) Recourse of empire, in: M. Smith & L. Marx (eds) Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
57. Van Zoonen, L. (2002) Gendering the Internet: claims, controversies and cultures, European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 5-23.
58. Vuojarvi, H., Isomaki, H. & Hynes, D. (2010) Domestication of a laptop on a wireless university campus: a case study, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 250-267.
59. Vyas, D., Chisalita, C. & van der Veer, G. (2006) Affordance in interaction, Proceedings of ECCE-Thirteen 13th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 20-22.
60. Wajcman, J. (2004) Technofeminism (Cambridge, Polity).
61. Wajcman, J. (2008) Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time, The British Journal of Sociology 59(1), 59-77.
62. Waltz, S. (2004) Giving artifacts a voice? Bringing into account technology in educational analysis, Educational Theory, 54(2), 157-172.
63. Williams, Raymond (1974) Television: technology and cultural form (London, Fontana).
64. Williams, Raymond (1981) Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society (London, Fontana).
65. Williams, Robin & Edge, D. (1996) What is the social shaping of technology? Research Policy, 25, 856-899.
66. Williams, Rosalind (1994) The political and feminist dimensions of technological determinism, in: M. Smith & L. Marx (eds) Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).
67. Winner, L. (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology, Science Technology & Human Values, 18(3), 362-378.
68. Woolgar, S. & Cooper, G. (1999) Do artefacts have ambivalence? Moses’ bridges, Winner’s bridges and other urban legends in S&TS, Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 433-449