Giving Artifacts A Voice

Educational Theory

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 157-172

  Waltz, Scott B ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35848936850     PISSN: 00132004     EISSN: 17415446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2004.00012.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ken Catlow quoted in Emily Harris, "Analysis: Pentagon Renovations to Improve Pentagon," All Things Considered, NPR, 12 April 2002.
2. See Ann De Vaney, "Will Educators Ever Unmask the Determiner, Technology?" Educational Policy 12, no. 5 (1998): 568-585.
3. American Anthropological Association, American Anthropological Association Statement of "Race," 1998. Available at 〈http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm〉. Last accessed 23 January 2004.
4. David Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).
5. Bruno Latour, Science in Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987), 6.
6. Langdon Winner, "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" in The Social Shaping of Technology, eds. Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1985
7. David Noble, Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation (New York: Knopf, 1984), xi.
8. Winner, "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" 37.
9. Nancy Knupfer and Theresa Gram, "Obstructive Interactive Television Designs: The Influence of Culture, Gender, and Power" (paper presented at the annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, Wyoming, October 1996), 382 383.
10. Ibid., 386.
11. See, for example, MacKenzie and Wajcman, eds., The Social Shaping of Technology
12. Keith Grint and Steve Woolgar, The Machine at Work (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), 21.
13. Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker, "The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or, How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other," Social Studies of Science 14, no. 3 (1984): 399-441.
14. Grint and Woolgar, The Machine at Work, 32. De Vaney adopts a similar approach in discussing the ways in which educational computer programs socially construct the subjects that use them.
15. See Ann De Vaney, "Reading Educational Computer Programs," in Computers in Education: Social, Political, and Historical Perspectives, eds. Robert Muffoletto and Nancy Knupfer (Cresskill: Hampton Press, 1993), 181-196.
16. See Steve Woolgar, "The Turn to Technology in Social Studies of Science," Science, Technology and Human Values 16, no. 1 (1991): 20-50.
17. Tim McDonough, "The Net and Norms: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Pedagogies" (paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Studies Association, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, October 2002).
18. Trevor Pinch, "Turn, Turn, and Turn Again: The Woolgar Formula," Science, Technology and Human Values 18, no. 4 (1993): 515.
19. Donna J. Haraway, "Situated Knowledges," in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (New York: Routledge, 1991): 183-201.
20. N. Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999
21. Haraway, "Situated Knowledges," 188.
22. Ibid., 200-202.
23. Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, 193.
24. Ibid., 207.
25. Ibid., 196.
26. This phrase is borrowed from Andrew Pickering's The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
27. John Law, Organizing Modernity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).
28. Ibid., 24.
29. Ibid., 2.
30. Latour, Science in Action.
31. Bruno Latour, "Technology Is Society Made Durable," in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Dominations, ed. John Law (London: Routledge, 1991), 103-131.
32. Madeleine Akrich, "The De-Scription of Technical Artifacts," in Shaping Technology/Building Society, eds. Weibe Bijker and John Law (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992), 206-207.
33. For a brief example of actor-network theory applied to the adoption of computers in schools, see Chris Bigum, "Solutions in Search of Educational Problems: Speaking for Computers in Schools," Educational Policy 12, no. 5 (1998): 586-601.
34. Madeleine Akrich and Bruno Latour, "A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies," in Shaping Technology/Building Society, eds. Bijker and Law.
35. Martin Heidegger, "The Thing," in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), 170.
36. Bruno Latour, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), 141.
37. Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, corrected ed., eds. David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne (New York: Macmillan, 1978 [1929]), 187.
38. Pickering, The Mangle of Practice.