Techno-economic evaluations for feasibility of sago-based biorefinery, Part 2: Integrated bioethanol production and energy systems

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 107, Issue , 2016, Pages 102-116

  Wan, Yoke Kin ^a   Sadhukhan, Jhuma ^b   Ng, Denny K S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioethanol production; Feasibility; Process integration; Sago biomass; Sago based biorefinery; Techno economic evaluation

Indexed keywords

BIOCONVERSION; BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPENSATION (PERSONNEL); COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; EMPLOYMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; FIBERS; FOSSIL FUELS; GLOBAL WARMING; INVESTMENTS; REFINING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STARCH; WAGES;

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; BIOREFINERIES; FEASIBILITY; PROCESS INTEGRATION; TECHNO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 84959922438     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adeni D.S.A., Bujang K.B., Hassan M.A., Abd-Aziz S. Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013:8. Article ID 935852. 10.1155/2013/935852.
2. Aziz A.S., Ang D.C., Yusof H.M., Karim M.I.A., Ari A.B., Uchiyama K., Shioya S. Effect of C/N ratio and starch concentration on ethanol production from sago starch using recombinant yeast. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17:713-719.
3. Bandaru V.V.R., Somalanka S.R., Mendu D.R., Madicherla N.R., Chityala A. Optimization of fermentation conditions for the production of ethanol from sago starch by co-immobilized amyloglucosidase and cells of Zymomonas mobilis using response surface methodology. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2006, 38(1-2):209-214.
4. Bioenergy Feedstock Information Network Bioenergy Conversion Factors 2014, https://bioenergy.ornl.gov/papers/misc/energy_conv.html (cited on February 2015).
5. Department of Energy & Climate Change Quarterly Energy Prices: March 2014 2014, A National Statistics Publication, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/quarterly-energy-prices-march-2014 (cited on October 2014).
6. Dwiarti L., Otsuka M., Miura S., Yaguchi M., Okabe M. Itaconic acid production using sago starch hydrolysate by Aspergillus terreus TN484-M1. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:3329-3337.
7. Huang Y., Mcllveen-Wright D.R., Rezvani S., Hunag M.J., Wang Y.D., Roskilly A.P., Hewitt N.J. Comparative techno-economic analysis of biomass fuelled combined heat and power for commercial buildings. Appl. Energy 2013, 112:518-525.
8. Humbird D., Davis R., Tao L., Kinchin C., Hsu D., Aden A., Schoen P., Lukas J., Olthof B., Worley M., Sexton D., Dudgeon D. Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pre-Treatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover, Technical Report, NREL/TP-5100-47764 2011, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
9. Jennings E.W., Schell D.J. Conditioning of dilute-acid pretreated corn stover hydrolysate liquors by treatment with lime or ammonium hydroxide to improve conversion of sugars to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1240-1245.
10. Kannan T.S., Ahmed A.S., Ani F.N. Energy efficient microwave irradiation of sago bark waste (SBW) for bioethanol production. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 701:249-253. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.701.249.
11. Kim C.H., Abidin Z., Ngee C.C., Rhee S.K. Pilot-scale ethanol fermentation by Zymomonas mobilis from simultaneously saccharified sago starch. Bioresour. Technol. 1992, 40:1-6.
12. Kim C.H., Rhee S.K. Process development for simultaneous starch saccharification and ethanol fermentation by Zymomonas mobilis. Process Biochem. 1993, 28(5):331-339.
13. Linggang S., Phang L.Y., Wasoh M.H., Aziz S.A. Sago pith residue as an alternative cheap substrate for fermentable sugars production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167:122-131.
14. Misailidis N., Campbell G.M., Du C., Sadhukhan J., Mustafa M., Mateos-Salvador F., Weightman R.M. Evaluating the feasibility of commercial arabinoxylan production in the context of a wheat biorefinery principally producing ethanol. Part 2. Process simulation and economic analysis. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2009, 87(9):1239-1250.
15. Moncada J., El-Halwagi M.M., Cardona C.A. Techno-economic analysis for a sugarcane biorefinery: Colombian case. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135:533-543.
16. Ng K.S., Sadhukhan J. Process integration and economic analysis of bio-oil platform for the production of methanol and combined heat and power. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:1153-1169.
17. Ng K.S., Sadhukhan J. Techno-economic performance analysis of bio-oil based Fisher-Tropsch and CHP synthesis platform. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:3218-3234.
18. Ratnam B.V.V., Rao M.N., Rao M.D., Rao S.S., Ayyanna C. Optimization of fermentation conditions for the production of ethanol from sago starch using response surface methodology. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 19:523-526.
19. Rosenberg J.N., Mathias A., Korth K., Betenbaugh M.J., Oyler G.A. Microalgal biomass production and carbon dioxide sequestration from an integrated ethanol biorefinery in Iowa: a technical appraisal and economic feasibility evaluation. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35(9):3865-3876.
20. Sadhukhan J., Ng K.S. Economic and European Union environmental sustainability criteria assessment of bio-oil-based biofuel systems: refinery integration cases. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:6794-6808.
21. Sadhukhan J., Ng K.S., Hernandez E.M. Biorefineries and Chemical Processes: Design, Integration and Sustainability Analysis 2014, Wiley, United Kingdom.
22. Sadhukhan J., Mustafa M.A., Misailidis N., Mateos-Salvador F., Du C., Campbell G.M. Value analysis tool for feasibility studies of biorefineries integrated with value added production. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63:503-519.
23. Saifuddin N., Hussain R. Microwave assisted bioethanol production from sago starch by co-culturing of Ragi Tapai and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Math. Stat. 2011, 7(3):198-206.
24. Sarawak Energy Berhad (SEB) Annual Report 2010, www.sarawakenergy.com.my/AnnualReport/SEBAR10.pdf (accessed 01.08.15).
25. Singhal R.S., Kennedy J.F., Gopalakrishnan S.M., Kaczmarek A., Knill C.J., Akmar P.F. Industrial production, processing, and utilization of sago palm-derived products. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72:1-20.
26. Sunaryanto R., Hariasih H.B., Safitri R. Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of sago starch for preparation of ethanol production. Microbiol. Indones. 2013, 7(2):68-74. 10.5454/mi.7.2.4.
27. Thangavelu S.K., Ahmed A.S., Ani F.N. Bioethanol production from sago pith waste using microwave hydrothermal hydrolysis accelerated by carbon dioxide. Appl. Energy 2014, 128:277-283. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.076.
28. Thornley P., Upham P., Huang Y., Rezvani S., Brammer J., Rogers J. Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options. Energy Pol. 2009, 37:890-903.
29. Wan Y.K., Sadhukhan J., Ng K.S., Ng D.K.S. Techno-economic evaluations for feasibility of sago biorefinery, Part 1: alternative energy systems. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, (in press).
30. Wan Y.K., Ng R.T.L., Ng D.K.S., Tan R.R. Material flow cost accounting (MFCA)-based approach for prioritisation of waste recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107:602-614.
31. Wan Y.K., Ng R.T.L., Ng D.K.S., Aviso K.B., Tan R.R. Fuzzy multi-footprint optimisation (FMFO) for synthesis of a sustainable value chain: Malaysian sago industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.050.