Functional marker development is challenged by the ubiquity of endophytes-a practical perspective

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 16-21

  Arnholdt Schmitt, Birgit ^a   Valadas, Vera ^b   Döring, Matthias ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^b EU Marie Curie   (Portugal)

^c SME INOQ GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Deep phenotyping; Endophytes; Functional marker development; Plant breeding

Indexed keywords

ENDOPHYTE; FUNCTIONAL MARKER; GENETIC MARKER; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; BREEDING; GENETICS; PLANT;

GENETIC MARKER;

BREEDING; ENDOPHYTES; GENETIC MARKERS; PLANTS;

EID: 84959523074     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elu049     Document Type: Letter

References (51)

1. Luebberstedt T, Varshney RK. Diagnostics in Plant Breeding. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2013, 521.
2. Zmieńko A, Samelak A, Kozlowski P, et al. Copy number polymorphism in plant genomes. Theor Appl Genet 2014;127(1):1-18.
3. Lübberstedt T. Diagnostics in plant breeding. In: Lübberstedt T, Varshney RK (eds). Diagnostics in Plant Breeding. Vol. 1. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, 3-9.
4. Brenner EA, Beavis WD, Andersen JR, et al. Prospects and limitations for development and application of functional markers in plants. In: Lübberstedt T, Varshney RK (eds). Diagnostics in Plant Breeding. Vol. 16. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, 329-46.
5. Cardoso HG, Arnholdt-Schmitt B. Functional marker development across species in selected traits. In: Lübberstedt T, Varshney RK (eds). Diagnostics in Plant Breeding. Vol. 21. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, 467-15.
6. Falke KC, Mahone GS. Non-DNA biomarkers. In: Lübberstedt T, Varshney RK (eds). Diagnostics in Plant Breeding. Vol 2. Netherland, Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, 11-37.
7. Sapp J. Genesis: The Evolution of Biology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, 384.
8. Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, et al. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007, 5(5):355-62.
9. Hyde KD, Soytong K. The fungal endophyte dilemma. Fungal Divers 2008;33:163-73.
10. Pohjanen J, Koskimäki JJ, PirttiläAM. Interactions of meristem-associated endophytic bacteria. In: Verma VC, Gange AC (eds). Advances in Endophytic Research. Vol. 1. India: Springer, 2014, 103-15.
11. Kozyrovska NO. Crosstalk between endophytes and a plant host within information-processing networks. Biopolym Cell 2013, 29(3):234-43.
12. Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants. The hologenome theory of evolution. Microbiol Rev 2008;32:723-35.
13. Ansari MI, Malik A. Recent development in the methods of studying microbial diversity. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds). Management of Microbial Resources in the Environment. Vol. 2. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013, 17-50.
14. Tabish M, Azim S, Hussain MA, et al. Bioinformatics approaches in studying microbial diversity. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds). Management of Microbial Resources in the Environment. Vol. 6. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013, 119-40.
15. Pershina EV, Andronov EE, Pinaev EG, Provorov NA. Recent advances and perspectives in metagenomic studies of soil microbial communities. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds). Management of Microbial Resources in the Environment. Vol. 2 Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013, 141-66.
16. Shintani M, Nojiri H. Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs) carrying catabolic genes. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds). Management of Microbial Resources in the Environment. Vol. 8. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013, 167-214.
17. Kaur S., Dhillon GS, Brar SK, et al. Potential Eco-friendly Soil Microorganisms: Road Towards Green and Sustainable Agriculture. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds). Management of microbial resources in the environment. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013, 10:249-88.
18. Ansari MI, Malik A. Antibiotic Resistance Gene Pool and Bacterial Adaptation to Xenobiotics in the Environment. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds). Management of Microbial Resources in the Environment. Vol. 15. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2013, 387-412.
19. Boyko A, Kovalchuk I. Transgenerational response to stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav 2010;5(8):995-8.
20. Boykoa A, Kovalchuk I. Genetic and epigenetic effects of plant-pathogen interactions: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Plant 2011;4:1014-23.
21. Grativol C, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PC. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of stress responses in natural plant populations. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1819(2):176-85.
22. Liu N, Ding Y, Fromm M, et al. Different gene-specific mechanisms determine the 'revised-response' memory transcription patterns of a subset of A. thaliana dehydration stress responding genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42(9):5556-66.
23. Sullivan TJ, Bultman TL, Rodstrom J, et al. Inducible defenses provided by Neotyphodium to Lolium arundinacea and Lolium pratense: an ecological and molecular approach. In: Popay AJ, Thom ER (eds). Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Fungal Endophytes of Grasses. Vol. 13. 2007, 147-9.
24. Gundel PE, Pérez LI, Helander M, et al. Symbiotically modified organisms: nontoxic fungal endophytes in grasses. Trends Plant Sci 2013;18(8):420-7.
25. Woodfield DR, Easton HS. Advances in pasture breeding for animal productivity and health. N Z Vet J 2004;52:300-10.
26. Panaccione DG, Johnson RD, Wang J, et al. Elimination of ergovaline from grass-Neotyphodium endophyte symbiosis by genetic modification of the endophyte. Proc Natl Sci USA 2001;98:12820-25.
27. Bouton JH, Latch GCM, Hill NS, et al. Reinfection of tall fescue cultivars with non-ergot alkaloid-producing endophytes. Agron J 2002;94:567-74.
28. Montañez A, Blanco AR, Barlocco C, et al. Characterization of cultivable putative endophytic plant growth promoting bacteria associated with maize cultivars (Zea mays L.) and their inoculation effects in vitro. Appl Soil Biol 2012;58:21-8.
29. Naveed M, Mitter B, Yousaf S, et al. The endophyte Enterobacter sp. FD17: a maize growth enhancer selected based on rigorous testing of plant beneficial traits and colonization characteristics. Biol Fert Soils 2014;50(2):249-62.
30. Arnholdt-Schmitt B. Stress-induced cell reprogramming. A role for global genome regulation? Plant Physiol 2004;136:2579-86.
31. Arnholdt-Schmitt B. Efficient cell reprogramming as a target for functional-marker strategies? Towards new perspectives in applied plant-nutrition research. J Plant Nutr Soil Sc 2005;168:617-24.
32. Tardieu F. Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. J Exp Bot 2012;63(1):25-31.
33. Harrison MT, Tardieu F, Dong Z, et al. Characterizing drought stress and trait influence on maize yield under current and future conditions. Glob Chang Biol 2014;20(3):867-78.
34. Rasmussen S, Barah P, Suarez-Rodriguez MC, et al. Transcriptome responses to combinations of stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2013;161(4):1783-94.
35. Afuape SO, Sayre R, Tawanda Z, et al. Transgenic cassava lines carrying heterologous alternative oxidase (AtAOX1a) showed impaired quantitative and qualitative response to embryogenesis. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12:4303-9.
36. Arnholdt-Schmitt, B. Physiological aspects of genome variability in tissue culture. II. Growth phase-dependent quantitative variability of repetitive BstN I fragments of primary cultures of Daucus carota L. Theor Appl Genet 1995;91:816-23.
37. Jacoby RP, Taylor NL, Millar AH. The role of mitochondrial respiration in salinity tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 2011;16(11):614-23.
38. Meyer JN, Leung MC, Rooney JP, et al. Mitochondria as a target of environmental toxicants. Toxicol Sci 2013;134(1):1-17.
39. Vanlerberghe GC. Alternative oxidase: a mitochondrial respiratory pathway to maintain metabolic and signaling homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stress in plants. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14(4):6805-47.
40. Whelan SP, Zuckerbraun BS. Mitochondrial signaling: forwards, backwards, and in between. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2013;2013:351-613.
41. Blanco NE, Guinea-Díaz M, Whelan J, et al. Interaction between plastid and mitochondrial retrograde signalling pathways during changes to plastid redox status. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014;369(1640):20130231.
42. Welchen E, García L, Mansilla N, et al. Coordination of plant mitochondrial biogenesis: keeping pace with cellular requirements. Front Plant Sci 2014;4:551.
43. Wallace DC, Fan W. Energetics, epigenetics, mitochondrial genetics. Mitochondrion 2010;10(1):12-31.
44. Kilian J, Peschke F, Berendzen KW, et al. Prerequisites, performance and profits of transcriptional profiling the abiotic stress response. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1819(2):166-75.
45. Fiorani F, Schurr U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2013;64:267-91.
46. Lisanti S, Tavecchio M, Chae YC, et al. Deletion of the mitochondrial chaperone TRAP-1 uncovers global reprogramming of metabolic networks. Cell Rep 2014;8(3):671-7.
47. Hansen LD, Farnsworth LK, Itoga NK, et al. Two subspecies and a hybrid of big sagebrush: Comparison of respiration and growth characteristics. J Arid Environ 2008;72:643-51.
48. Hansen LD, Thomas NR, Arnholdt-Schmitt B. Temperature responses of substrate carbon conversion efficiencies and growth rates of plant tissues. Physiol Plant 2009;137:446-58.
49. Nogales A, Muñoz-Sanhueza L, Hansen LD, et al. Phenotyping carrot (Daucus carota L.) for yield-determining temperature response by calorespirometry. Planta 2015;241(2):525-38.
50. Arnholdt-Schmitt B, Hansen LD, Nogales A, et al. AOX goes risky - a way to application: AOX diversity studies stimulate novel tool development for phenotyping: calorespirometry. In: Sub-chapter in Arnholdt-Schmitt B. From AOX diversity to functional marker development. In: Gupta KJ, Mur LAJ, Neelwarne B (eds). Alternative Respiratory Pathways in Higher Plants. Oxford: John Wiley&Sons, Inc., 2015. https://sites.google.com/site/alternativerespiratorypathways/.
51. Nogales A, Noceda C, Ragonez1i C, et al. Discovering the relevance of AOX gene diversity: Functional marker development from AOX genes requires deep phenotyping and individualized diagnosis. In: Sub-chapter in Arnholdt-Schmitt B. From AOX diversity to functional marker development. In: Gupta KJ, Mur LAJ, Neelwarne B (eds). Alternative Respiratory Pathways in Higher Plants. Oxford: John Wiley&Sons, Inc., 2015. https://sites.google.com/site/alternativerespiratory pathways/.