Measuring epistasis in fitness landscapes: The correlation of fitness effects of mutations

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 396, Issue , 2016, Pages 132-143

  Ferretti, Luca ^a,b,c   Schmiegelt, Benjamin ^d   Weinreich, Daniel ^e   Yamauchi, Atsushi ^f   Kobayashi, Yutaka ^g   Tajima, Fumio ^h   Achaz, Guillaume ^a,b  

^a UPMC ^*  (France)

^b l'alimentation et l'Environnement   (France)

^c INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^e BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g KOCHI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Fitness; Mutations; Ruggedness

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; EPISTASIS; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; EPISTASIS; FITNESS EFFECT; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL;

EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION;

EID: 84959298014     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.01.037     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aita T., Uchiyama H., Inaoka T., Nakajima M., Kokubo T., Husimi Y. Analysis of a local fitness landscape with a model of the rough mt. fuji-type landscape. application to prolyl endopeptidase and thermolysis. Biopolymers 2000, 54(1):64-79. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(200007)54:1¡64::AID-BIP70¿3.0.CO;2-R.
2. Aita T., Iwakura M., Husimi Y. A cross-section of the fitness landscape of dihydrofolate reductase. Protein Eng. 2001, 14(9):633-638.
3. Berestycki J., Brunet É., Shi Z. The number of accessible paths in the hypercube. Bernoulli 2016, 22(2):653-680. 10.3150/14-BEJ641.
4. Blanquart, F., Achaz, G., Bataillon, T., Tenaillon, O. Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model. http://arXiv:1405.3504.
5. Brouillet, S., Annony, H., Ferretti, L., Achaz, G., MAGELLAN: a tool to explore small fitness landscapes. biorXiv 031583, 〈〉. http://www.abi.snv.jussieu.fr/public/Magellan/Magellan.main.html.
6. Campos P.R., Adami C., Wilke C.O. Optimal adaptive performance and delocalization in NK fitness landscapes. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2002, 304(3):495-506.
7. Chevin L.-M., Martin G., Lenormand T. Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation. restricted pleiotropy, heterogenous mutation, and parallel evolution. Evolution 2010, 64(11):3213-3231. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01058.x.
8. Chevin L.-M., Decorzent G., Lenormand T. Niche dimensionality and the genetics of ecological speciation. Evolution 2014, 68(5):1244-1256. 10.1111/evo.12346.
9. Colegrave N., Buckling A. Microbial experiments on adaptive landscapes. Bioessays 2005, 27(11):1167-1173. 10.1002/bies.20292.
10. De Visser J.A.G.M., Krug J. Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15(7):480-490. 10.1038/nrg3744.
11. De Visser, J.A., Hoekstra, R.F., Van den Ende, H., 1997. Test of interaction between genetic markers that affect fitness in Aspergillus niger. Evolution 51, 1499-1505.
12. De Visser J.A.G.M., Park S.-C., Krug J. Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes. Am. Nat. 2009, 174(Suppl 1):S15-S30. 10.1086/599081.
13. Draghi J.A., Plotkin J.B. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories. Evolution 2013, 67(11):3120-3131. 10.1111/evo.12192.
14. Franke J., Klözer A., De Visser J.A.G.M., Krug J. Evolutionary accessibility of mutational pathways. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7(8):e1002134. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002134.
15. Gavrilets, S., 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
16. Gillespie J.H. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1983, 23(2):202-215.
17. Greene D., Crona K. The changing geometry of a fitness landscape along an adaptive walk. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10(5):e1003520. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003520.
18. Hegarty P., Martinsson A., et al. On the existence of accessible paths in various models of fitness landscapes. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2014, 24(4):1375-1395.
19. Kauffman S., Levin S. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 1987, 128(1):11-45.
20. Kauffman S.A., Weinberger E.D. The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response. J. Theor. Biol. 1989, 141(2):211-245.
21. Kauffman S. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution 1993, Oxford University Press.
22. Kingman J. A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation. J. Appl. Probab. 1978, 1-12.
23. Kondrashov F.A., Kondrashov A.S. Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98(21):12089-12092. 10.1073/pnas.211214298.
24. Mézard M., Virasoro M.A., Parisi G. Spin Glass Theory and Beyond 1987, World Scientific, Singapore.
25. Neidhart J., Szendro I.G., Krug J. Exact results for amplitude spectra of fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 2013, 332:218-227. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.05.002.
26. Orr H.A. The genetic theory of adaptation. a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6(2):119-127. 10.1038/nrg1523.
27. Otto S.P. The evolutionary enigma of sex. Am. Nat. 2009, 174(Suppl 1):S1-S14. 10.1086/599084.
28. Phillips P.C. Epistasis-the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9(11):855-867. 10.1038/nrg2452.
29. Poelwijk F.J., Kiviet D.J., Weinreich D.M., Tans S.J. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 2007, 445(7126):383-386. 10.1038/nature05451.
30. Richter, H., 2014. Fitness landscapes: from evolutionary biology to evolutionary computation. In: Recent Advances in the Theory and Application of Fitness Landscapes. Springer, Berlin pp. 3-31.
31. Salverda M.L.M., Dellus E., Gorter F.A., Debets A.J.M., Van der Oost J., Hoekstra R.F., Tawfik D.S., De Visser J.A.G.M. Initial mutations direct alternative pathways of protein evolution. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7(3):e1001321. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001321.
32. Schmiegelt B., Krug J. Evolutionary accessibility of modular fitness landscapes. J. Stat. Phys. 2014, 154:334-355.
33. Stadler P.F. Landscapes and their correlation functions. J. Math. Chem. 1996, 20(1):1-45.
34. Stein, D.L. (Ed.), Spin Glasses and Biology. Series on Directions in Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 6. World Scientific, Singapore. ISBN: 978-9971-5-0537-0 (Book 6).
35. Szendro, I.G., Schenk, M.F., Franke, J., Krug, J., De Visser, J.A.G.M., Quantitative analyses of empirical fitness landscapes. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.
36. Watson R.A., Weinreich D.M., Wakeley J. Genome structure and the benefit of sex. Evolution 2011, 65(2):523-536. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01144.x.
37. Weinberger E.D. Local properties of Kauffman's NK model. a tunably rugged energy landscape. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 44(10):6399.
38. Weinreich D.M., Watson R.A., Chao L. Perspective. sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 2005, 59(6):1165-1174.
39. Weinreich D.M., Delaney N.F., Depristo M.A., Hartl D.L. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 2006, 312(5770):111-114. 10.1126/science.1123539.
40. Weinreich D.M., Lan Y., Wylie C.S., Heckendorn R.B. Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2013, 23(6):700-707. 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.007.
41. Wright, S., 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Genetics, vol. 1, pp. 356-366.