Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: The combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 656-662.e1

  Liu, Yanhe ^a,b   Chapple, Vincent ^a   Feenan, Katie ^a   Roberts, Peter ^b   Matson, Phillip ^a,b  

^a Joondalup Hospital   (Australia)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

deselection; Embryo; implantation; pronuclear fading; time lapse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; DESELECTION MODEL; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO GROWTH; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MODEL; NIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; BLASTOCYST; FERTILITY; INFERTILITY; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOGENESIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BLASTOCYST; EMBRYO CULTURE TECHNIQUES; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOGENESIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TIME FACTORS; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84959271106     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. M. Meseguer, J. Herrero, A. Tejera, K.M. Hilligsoe, N.B. Ramsing, and J. Remohi The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation Hum Reprod 26 2011 2658 2671
2. C.C. Wong, K.E. Loewke, N.L. Bossert, B. Behr, C.J. De Jonge, T.M. Baer, and et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage Nat Biotechnol 28 2010 1115 1121
3. J. Conaghan, A.A. Chen, S.P. Willman, K. Ivani, P.E. Chenette, R. Boostanfar, and et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial Fertil Steril 100 2013 412 419.e5
4. K. Kirkegaard, I.E. Agerholm, and H.J. Ingerslev Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment Hum Reprod 27 2012 1277 1285
5. I. Rubio, A. Galan, Z. Larreategui, F. Ayerdi, J. Bellver, J. Herrero, and et al. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope Fertil Steril 102 2014 1287 1294.e5
6. D.K. Gardner, M. Meseguer, C. Rubio, and N.R. Treff Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability Hum Reprod Update 21 2015 727 747
7. L. Best, A. Campbell, S. Duffy, S. Montgomery, and S. Fishel Does one model fit all? Testing a published embryo selection algorithm on independent timelapse data Hum Reprod 28 Suppl 1 2013 i87 i90
8. T. Freour, N. Le Fleuter, J. Lammers, C. Splingart, A. Reignier, and P. Barriere External validation of a time-lapse prediction model Fertil Steril 103 2015 917 922
9. E. Yalcinkaya, E.G. Ergin, E. Caliskan, Z. Oztel, A. Ozay, and H. Ozornek Reproducibility of a time-lapse embryo selection model based on morphokinetic data in a sequential culture media setting J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 15 2014 156 160
10. Y. Liu, C. Copeland, A. Stevens, K. Feenan, V. Chapple, K. Myssonski, and et al. Assessment of human embryos by time-lapse videography: a comparison of quantitative and qualitative measures between two independent laboratories Reprod Biol 2015 10.1016/j.repbio.2015.09.00.1 In press
11. H.N. Ciray, T. Aksoy, C. Goktas, B. Ozturk, and M. Bahceci Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media - a sibling oocyte study J Assist Reprod Genet 29 2012 891 900
12. K. Kirkegaard, J.J. Hindkjaer, and H.J. Ingerslev Effect of oxygen concentration on human embryo development evaluated by time-lapse monitoring Fertil Steril 99 2013 738 744.e4
13. T. Freour, L. Dessolle, J. Lammers, S. Lattes, and P. Barriere Comparison of embryo morphokinetics after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in smoking and nonsmoking women Fertil Steril 99 2013 1944 1950
14. M.L. Wissing, M.R. Bjerge, A.I.G. Olesen, T. Hoest, and A.L. Mikkelsen Impact of PCOS on early embryo cleavage kinetics Reprod Biomed Online 28 2014 508 514
15. M. Munoz, M. Cruz, P. Humaidan, N. Garrido, I. Perez-Cano, and M. Meseguer The type of GnRH analogue used during controlled ovarian stimulation influences early embryo developmental kinetics: a time-lapse study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 168 2013 167 172
16. M. Munoz, M. Cruz, P. Humaidan, N. Garrido, I. Perez-Cano, and M. Meseguer Dose of recombinant FSH and oestradiol concentration on day of HCG affect embryo development kinetics Reprod Biomed Online 25 2012 382 389
17. A. Wdowiak, S. Bakalczuk, and G. Bakalczuk The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on the dynamics of the embryonic development in intracytoplasmatic sperm injection Reprod Biol 15 2015 94 100
18. K. Athayde Wirka, A.A. Chen, J. Conaghan, K. Ivani, M. Gvakharia, B. Behr, and et al. Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development Fertil Steril 101 2014 1637-48.e1-5
19. Y. Liu, V. Chapple, P. Roberts, and P. Matson Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system Fertil Steril 102 2014 1295 1300.e2
20. I. Rubio, R. Kuhlmann, I. Agerholm, J. Kirk, J. Herrero, M.J. Escriba, and et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study Fertil Steril 98 2012 1458 1463
21. Y. Liu, V. Chapple, K. Feenan, P. Roberts, and P. Matson Clinical significance of intercellular contact at the four-cell stage of human embryos, and the use of abnormal cleavage patterns to identify embryos with low implantation potential: a time-lapse study Fertil Steril 103 2015 1485 1491.e1
22. H.N. Ciray, A. Campbell, I.E. Agerholm, J. Aguilar, S. Chamayou, M. Esbert, and et al. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group Hum Reprod 29 2014 2650 2660
23. Y. Liu, V. Chapple, P. Roberts, J. Ali, and P. Matson Time-lapse videography of human oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: events up to the first cleavage division Reprod Biol 14 2014 249 256
24. Y. Liu, V. Chapple, K. Feenan, P. Roberts, and P. Matson Time-lapse videography of human embryos: using pronuclear fading rather than insemination in IVF and ICSI cycles removes inconsistencies in time to reach early cleavage milestones Reprod Biol 15 2015 122 125
25. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting Hum Reprod 26 2011 1270 1283
26. C. Siristatidis, and M. Hamilton Single embryo transfer Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 17 2007 192 194
27. J. Gerris, and E. Van Royen Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: a plea for single embryo transfer Hum Reprod 15 2000 1884 1888
28. E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, D. De Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, M. Van de Meerssche, G. Ryckaert, and et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer Hum Reprod 14 1999 2345 2349
29. E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, D. De Neubourg, I. Laureys, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model Hum Reprod 16 2001 326 332
30. D.K. Gardner, P. Vella, M. Lane, L. Wagley, T. Schlenker, and W.B. Schoolcraft Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers Fertil Steril 69 1998 84 88
31. S. Dar, T. Lazer, P.S. Shah, and C.L. Librach Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 20 2014 439 448
32. B. Kallen, O. Finnstrom, A. Lindam, E. Nilsson, K.G. Nygren, and P.O. Olausson Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome? Fertil Steril 94 2010 1680 1683
33. D. Fernando, J.L. Halliday, S. Breheny, and D.L. Healy Outcomes of singleton births after blastocyst versus nonblastocyst transfer in assisted reproductive technology Fertil Steril 97 2012 579 584
34. A. Maheshwari, T. Kalampokas, J. Davidson, and S. Bhattacharya Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 100 2013 1615-21.e1-10
35. D. Zander-Fox, K. Tremellen, and M. Lane Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes Austral N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 51 2011 406 410
36. D. Glujovsky, D. Blake, C. Farquhar, and A. Bardach Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 CD002118
37. A. Campbell, S. Fishel, N. Bowman, S. Duffy, M. Sedler, and C.F. Hickman Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics Reprod Biomed Online 26 2013 477 485
38. E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, D. De Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, G. Ryckaert, and et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos Hum Reprod 18 2003 1062 1069
39. E.G. Ergin, E. Caliskan, E. Yalcinkaya, Z. Oztel, K. Cokelez, A. Ozay, and et al. Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by time-lapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome Fertil Steril 102 2014 1029 1033.e1
40. L. Sundvall, H.J. Ingerslev, U. Breth Knudsen, and K. Kirkegaard Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations Hum Reprod 28 2013 3215 3221
41. J.C. Arce, S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, and P. Sorensen Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments Hum Reprod 21 2006 2141 2148
42. G. Paternot, J. Devroe, S. Debrock, T.M. D'Hooghe, and C. Spiessens Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7 2009 105