Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2016, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Glujovsky, Demián ^a   Farquhar, Cindy ^b   Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta ^a   Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto ^a   Blake, Deborah ^c  

^a Centro de Estudios en Ginecologia y Reproduccion Buenos Aires   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c Repromed Fertility Specialists   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; BLASTOCYST; CONCEPTION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FREEZING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LIVE BIRTH; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; META ANALYSIS; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TRANSPLANTATION;

BLASTOCYST; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84977662049     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Aziminekoo E, Mohseni Salehi MS, Kalantari V, Shahrokh Tehraninejad E, Haghollahi F, Hossein Rashidi B, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst stage transfer comparing to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Gynecological Endocrinology 2015;31(11):880-4.
2. Brugnon F, Bouraoui Z, Ouchchane L, Gremeau AS, Peikrishvili R, Pouly JL, et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates after single cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: A randomized and prospective study. Human Reproduction 2010;25:i60-1.
3. Bungum M, Bungum L, Humaidan P, Yding Andersen C. Day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2003;7(1):98-104.
4. Coskun S, Hollanders J, Al-Hassan S, Al-Sufyan H, Al-Mayman H, Jaroudi K. Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial. Human Reproduction 2000;15(9):1947-52.
5. Devreker F, Delbaere A, Emiliani S, Van den Bergh M, Biramane J, Englert Y. Prospective and randomized comparison between transfer on day 2 or day 5 for patients with more than four IVF attempts. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. 2000:P135.
6. Elgindy EA, Abou-Setta AM, Mostafa MI. Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2011;23(6):789-98. [PUBMED: 22050864]
7. Emiliani S, Delbaere A, Vannin A, Biramane J, Verdoodt M, Englert Y, et al. Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study. Human Reproduction 2003;18(10):2145-50.
8. Fernandez-Shaw S. Unpublished data including live birth and cumulative live birth rates [personal communication]. Email to: Demián Glujovsky 6 May 2016.
9. Fernandez-Shaw S, Cercas R, Brana C, Villas C, Pons I. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2015;32(2):177-84.
10. Fisch JD, Adamowicz M, Hackworth J, Ginsburg M, Keskintepe L, Sher G. Single embryo transfer (SET) day 3 vs day 5 based on graduated embryo score (GES) and soluble human leukocyte antigen-G (sHLA-G): preliminary results of a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2007;88(Suppl 1):332-3, abstract no. 679.
11. Frattarelli JL, Leondires MP, McKeeby JL, Miller BT, Segars JH. Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2003;79(1):228-30.
12. Gaafar SH, El Fourtia I, El Tawil S, El Guiziry D, El Maghraby H. Blastocyst versus day 2-3 transfer in ICSI cycles for male factor infertility: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2015;30(Suppl 1):i217, abstract no: P-223.
13. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 1998;13(12):3434-40.
14. Hreinsson J, Rosenlund B, Fridstrom M, Ek I, Levkov L, Sjoblom P, et al. Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;117:194-200.
15. Karaki RZ, Samarraie SS, Younis NA, Lahloub TM, Ibrahim MH. Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertility and Sterility 2002;77(1):114-8.
16. Kaur P, Swarankar ML, Maheshwari M, Acharya V. A comparative study between cleavage stage embryo transfer at day 3 and blastocyst stage transfer at day 5 in in-vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection on clinical pregnancy rates. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 2014;7(3):194-7.
17. Kaur P, Swarankar ML, Maheshwari M, Sharma S. Implantation rates after two and five days of embryo culture: A comparative study. JK Science 2013;15(4):185-8.
18. Kolibianakis EM, Zilopoulos K, Verpoest W, Camus M, Joris H, Van Steirteghem AC, et al. Should we advise patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or day 5 transfer?. Human Reproduction 2004;19:2550-4.
19. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Hackmon Ram R, Sonin Y, Har Vardi I, Potashnik G. A prospective, randomized study comparing blastocyst stage versus 48-72 hr embryo transfer in women failed to conceive three or more in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertility and Sterility 2001;Suppl 1(3):118.
20. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Hackmon-Ram R, Sonin Y, Har-Vardi I, Potashnik G. A prospective, randomized study comparing blastocyst versus 48-72 h embryo transfer in women failed to conceive three or more in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; 2001 Oct 22-24; Orlando (FL). 2001.
21. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Har-Vardi I, Albotiano S, Sonin Y, Hackmon-Ram R, et al. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81(3):567-71.
22. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hackmon-Ram R, Albotiano S, Sonin Y, et al. Blastocyst stage versus 48-72 h embryo transfer in women who failed to conceive on three or more IVF treatment cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; 2000 June 25-28; Bologna. 2000:O-021.
23. Levron J, Shulman A, Bider D, Seidman D, Levin T, Dor J. A prospective randomized study comparing day 3 with blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility 2002;77:1300-1.
24. Livingstone M, Bowman M. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomised trial. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility. 2001:218.
25. Motta LA, Alegretti JR, Pico M, Sousa JW, Baracat EC, Serafini P. Blastocyst vs. cleaving embryo transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertility and Sterility 1998;70(Suppl 1):17.
26. Pantos K, Makrakis E, Stavrou D, Karantzis P, Vaxevanoglou T, Tzigounis V. Comparison of embryo transfer on day 2, day 3, and day 6: a prospective randomized study. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81(2):454-5.
27. Papanikolaou EG Sr, Verheyen G, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Ongoing pregnancy rate is significantly higher with day 5 embryo transfer than after day 3 embryo transfer, when more than three embryos are available on the third day of embryo culture. Fertility and Sterility 2005, issue 1:s51.
28. Papanikolaou EG, D'haeseleer E, Verheycn G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of culture. A randomized prospective study. Human Reproduction 2005;20(11):3198-203.
29. Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Landuyt LV, Steirteghem AV, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos. The New England Journal of Medicine 2006;354:1139-46.
30. Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Turki H, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Single embryo transfer: comparison of cleavage stage embryo transfer with blastocyst stage embryo transfer. A randomized prospective study. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; 2005 June 19-22; Copenhagen. 2005.
31. Rienzi l, Ubaldi F, Lacobelli M, Ferrero S, Minasi MG, Martinez F, et al. Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer. Human Reproduction 2002;17:1852-5.
32. Schillaci R, Castelli A, Vassiliadis A, Venezia R, Sciacca GM, Perino A, et al. Blastocyst stage versus versus day 2 embryo transfer in IVF cycles. Abstracts of the 18th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; 2002 June 30-July 3; Vienna. Vienna, 2002:P-418.
33. Ten J, Carracedo MA, Guerrero J, Rodriguez-Arnedo A, Llacer J, Bernabeu R. Day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer?: A randomized prospective study. Human Reproduction. 2011; Vol. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE); 2011 July 3-6; Stockholm:i165.
34. Van der Auwera I, Debrock S, Spiessens C, Afschrift H, Bakelants E, Meuleman C, et al. A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer. Human Reproduction 2002;17:1507-12.
35. Bungum L, Bungum M, Humaiden P. Blastocyst stage transfer is not better than embryo transfer on day 3: A prospective randomized study. Human Reproduction 2002; Vol. 17, issue Suppl 1:53.
36. Guerin JF, Mathieu C, Pinatel MC, Reginier-Vigouroux G, Lornage J, Boulieu D, et al. Coculture of human embryos with monkey kidney epithelial cells: clinical data concerning transfers delayed at D3 and D5. Contraception, Fertilite, Sexualite 1991;19(7-8):635-8.
37. Levron J, Bider D, Shulman A, Rabinovichi Y, Seidman D, Dor J. A randomized prospective study on blastocyst versus day 2-3 embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility 2001;Suppl 1(3):4.
38. Loup V, Anahory T, Reyftmann L, Dechaud H, Hedon B, Hamamah S. Efficiency of consecutive embryos transfer on day 3 and day 5 than replacement of 2 embryos on day 3 for women over 37 years: Prospective study. Molecular Human Reproduction 2009;24:i139.
39. Menezo Y, Hazout A, Dumont M, Herbaut N, Nicollet B. Coculture of embryos on Vero cells and transfer of blastocysts in humans. Human Reproduction 1992;7(Suppl 1):101-6.
40. Utsunomiya T, Ito H, Nagaki M, Sato J. A prospective, randomised study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage. Human Reproduction 2004;19:1598-1603.
41. Vanderzwalmen P, Lejeune B, Puissant F, Vanderzwalmen S, Zech H, Zintz M, et al. A prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 vs. day 5. Human Reproduction 2006;Suppl:i80-1.
42. Zech NH, Lejeune B, Puissant F, Vanderzwalmen S, Zech H, Vanderzwalmen P. Prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 versus day 5. Fertility and Sterility 2007;88(1):244-6.
43. ChiCTR-ICR-15006184 . Cumulative live birth rates compared blastocyst with cleavage-stage transfer: a prospective randomised, multi-center, open-label study. www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=10698 (accessed 12 May 2012).
44. NCT01107002 . Comparison of 5 day embryo transfer with 2-3 day transfer in patients with previous in vitro fertilization failure. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01107002 (accessed 12 May 2016).
45. NCT02639000 . Effects of blastocyst stage compared with cleavage stage embryo transfer in women below 39 years. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02639000 (accessed 12 May 2016).
46. Armstrong S, Arroll N, Cree LM, Jordan V, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub2]
47. Baart EB, Martini E, van den Berg I, Macklon NS, Galjaard RJ, Fauser BC, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Human Reproduction 2006;21(1):223-33.
48. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9.
49. Behr B, Fisch JD, Racowsky C, Miller K, Pool TB, Milki AA. Blastocyst-ET and monozygotic twinning. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2000;17(6):349-51.
50. Borg K, Moller A, Hammar M, Blake D, Hillensjo T, Wikland M. Blastocyst culture - more or less stressful for patients?. Abstract Book European Society of Human Reproduction and Enbryology (ESHRE). Bologna, 2000:48.
51. Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature 1988;332:459-61.
52. Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort HMH. Impairment of hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implanation by assisted hatching using micromanipulation. Human Reproduction 1990;5:7-13.
53. Croxatto HB, Fuentaealba B, Diaz S, Pastene L, Tatum HJ. A simple non-surgical technique to obtain unimplanted eggs from human uteri. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1972;112(5):662-8.
54. De Felici M, Siracusa G. Spontaneous hardening of the zona pellucida of mouse oocytes during in vitro culture. Gamete Research 1982;6:107-13.
55. De Placido G, Wilding M, Strina I, Alviggi E, Alviggi C, Mollo A, et al. High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate. Human Reproduction 2002;17(9):2402-9.
56. Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Human Reproduction Update 2012;18(5):536-54. [DOI: 10.1093; PUBMED: 22537859]
57. Edwards RG, Brody SA. History and ethics of assisted human conception. Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction. Philadelphia: WB Sauders, 1995:17-47.
58. Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, Schönauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Human Reproduction 2001;16(6):1115-9.
59. Gardner DK, Lane M, Calderon I, Leeton J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cell. Fertility and Sterility 1996;65(2):349-53.
60. Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocyts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertility and Sterility 1998;69(1):84-8.
61. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Changing the start temperature and cooling rate in a slow-freezing protocol increases human blastocyst viability. Fertility and Sterility 2003;79:407-10.
62. Gardner DK, Surry E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer a prospective randomised trial. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81:551-5.
63. Computer program on www.gradepro.org. Version 30 May 2016. GRADEpro. McMaster University, 2014.
64. Greisinger G. Beware of the implantation rate. Human Reproducton 2016;31(2):249-51.
65. Hamberger L, Hardarson T, Nygren KG. Avoidance of multiple pregnancy by use of single embryo transfer. Minerva Ginecologica 2005;57:15-9.
66. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
67. Iwayama H, Hochi S, Yamashita M. In vitro and in vivo viability of human blastocysts collapsed by laser pulse or osmotic shock prior to vitrification. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2011;28(4):355-61.
68. Jain JK, Boostanfar R, Slater CC, Francis MM, Paulson RJ. Monozygotic twins and triplets in association with blastocyst transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2004;21(4):103-7.
69. Jones GM, Trounson AO. The benefits of extended culture. Human Reproduction 1999;14(6):1405-8.
70. Jones GM, Cram DS, Song B, Kokkali G, Pantos K, Trounson AO. Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts. Human Reproduction 2008;23(8):1748-59.
71. Laverge H, De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Dhont M. A prospective, randomized study comparing day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer in human IVF. Human Reproduction 2001;16(3):476-80.
72. Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertility and Sterility 2007;87:519-23.
73. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Munne S, Ferraretti AP. Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1998;15(5):297-301.
74. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I, Trounson A. Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Human Reproduction 2000;15:1781-6.
75. Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016;32(2):142-6.
76. Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertility and Sterility 1999;72(6):1035-40.
77. Marston JH, Penn R, Sivelle PC. Successful autotransfer of tubal eggs in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 1977;49:175-6.
78. Menezo YJ, Guerin JF, Czyba JC. Improvement of human embryo development in vitro by coculture on monolayers of Vero cells. Biology of Reproduction 1990;42(2):301-6.
79. Menezo YJ, Chouteau J, Torello J, Girard A, Veiga A. Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertility and Sterility 1999;72(2):221-4.
80. Milki AA, Fisch JD, Behr B. Two-blastocyst transfer has similar pregnancy rates and a decreased multiple gestation rate compared with three-blastocyst transfer. Fertility and Sterility 1999;72(2):225-8.
81. Milki A, Hinckley M, Westphal L, Behr B. Elective single blastoyst transfer. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81:1697-8.
82. Moayeri S, Behr B, Lathi R, Westphal L, Milki A. Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8 year experience. Fertility and Sterility 2007;87(5):1028-32.
83. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C, Cohen J. Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2002;4(3):223-32.
84. Nel-Themaat L, Nagy ZP. A review of the promises and pitfalls of oocyte and embryo metabolomics. Placenta 2011;32(3):S257-63.
85. Palmstierna M, Murkes D, Csemizdy G, Andersson O, Wramsby H. Zona pellucida thickness variation and occurrence of visible mononucleated blastomeres in preembryos are associated with a high pregnancy rate in IVF treatments. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1998;15(2):70-5.
86. Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction 2008;23(1):91-9. [PUBMED: 17965420]
87. Plachot M, Mayenga JM, Chouraqui A, Tesquier L, Serkine AM, Belaisch-Allart J. A prospective semi-randomized study of blastocyst transfer in an IVF programme. Proceedings of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Conference. 1999:215.
88. Puissant F, Van Rysselberge M, Barlow P, Deweze J, Leroy F. Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Human Reproduction 1987;2(8):705-8.
89. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
90. Richter KS, Schuff M, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Human Reproduction 2016 Jun 6 [Epub ahead of print]. [10.1093/humrep/dew127]
91. Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo policy. Fertility and Sterility 2015;103(5):1190-3. [doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.045. Epub 2015 Mar 4.]
92. Roseboom TJ, Vermeiden JP, Schoute E, Lens JW, Schats R. The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Human Reproduction 1995;10(11):3035-41.
93. Scholtes MC, Zeilmaker GH. A prospective, randomized study of embryo transfer results after 3 or 5 days of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 1996;65(6):1245-8.
94. Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Blastocyst versus day 2 or 3 transfer. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 2001;19:259-68.
95. Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M, Miller B. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Human Reproduction 2000;15(11):2394-403.
96. Sills ES, Tucker MJ, Palermo GD. Assisted reproductive technologies and monozygous twins: implications for future study and clinical practice. Twin Research 2000;2:217-23.
97. Sjoblom P, Menzes J, Cummins L, Mathiyalagan B. Prediction of embryo developmental potential and pregnancy based on early stage morphological characteristics. Fertility and Sterility 2006;86:848-61.
98. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomised control trial. Human Reproduction 2004;19(12):2849-58.
99. Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Human Reproduction 1992;7(1):117-9.
100. Tsirgotis M. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits - Too soon to abandon practice?. Human Reproduction 1998;13(12):3285-95.
101. Vail A, Gardener E. Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials. Human Reproduction 2003;18:1000-4.
102. Valbuena D, Martin J, dePablo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they affect the embryo. Fertility and Sterility 2001;76(5):962-8.
103. Van Blerkom J. Development of human embryos to the hatched blastocyst stage in the presence or absence of a monolayer of Vero cells. Human Reproduction 1993;8:1525-39.
104. Wang SS, Sun HX. Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis. Yonsei Medical Journal 2014;55(3):815-25. [PUBMED: 24719153]
105. Waters A-M, Dean JH, Sullivan EA. Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zealand 2003. AIHW Cat. No. PER 31 Sydney Assisted Reproduction. 9th Edition. AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2006.
106. Yeung WS, Ho PC, Lau EY, Chan ST. Improved development of human embryos in vitro by a human oviductal cell co-culture system. Human Reproduction 1992;7:1144-9.
107. Blake D, Jones G, Johnson NP, Olive D, Wilson ML. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception (In vitro fertilisation, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118]
108. Blake D, Proctor M, Johnson N, Olive D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118]
109. Blake D, Proctor M, Johnson N, Olive D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub2]
110. Blake DA, Farquhar CM, Johnson N, Proctor M. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub3]
111. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4]