A combined binary interaction and phenotypic map of C. elegans cell polarity proteins

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 337-346

  Koorman, Thijs ^a   Klompstra, Diana ^b,d   Van Der Voet, Monique ^a,e   Lemmens, Irma ^c,d   Ramalho, Joaõ J ^a   Nieuwenhuize, Susan ^a   Van Den Heuvel, Sander ^a   Tavernier, Jan ^c,d   Nance, Jeremy ^b   Boxem, Mike ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE ACTIVATING PROTEIN; RHOGAP PAC 1 PROTEIN; RHOGAP PAC 6 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN; RHO GTPASE-ACTIVATING PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL POLARITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NONMAMMALIAN EMBRYO; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CELL POLARITY; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; GTPASE-ACTIVATING PROTEINS; PHENOTYPE; RNA INTERFERENCE;

EID: 84959236032     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3300     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Humbert, P. O. et al. Control of tumourigenesis by the Scribble/Dlg/Lgl polarity module. Oncogene 27, 6888-6907 (2008).
2. Tepass, U. The apical polarity protein network in Drosophila epithelial cells: regulation of polarity, junctions, morphogenesis, cell growth, and survival. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 655-685 (2012).
3. St Johnston, D., Ahringer, J. Cell polarity in eggs and epithelia: parallels and diversity. Cell 141, 757-774 (2010).
4. Jacob, L., Opper, M., Metzroth, B., Phannavong, B., Mechler, B. M. Structure of the l(2)gl gene of Drosophila and delimitation of its tumor suppressor domain. Cell 50, 215-225 (1987).
5. Woods, D. F., Bryant, P. J. The discs-large tumor suppressor gene of Drosophila encodes a guanylate kinase homolog localized at septate junctions. Cell 66, 451-464 (1991).
6. Bilder, D., Perrimon, N. Localization of apical epithelial determinants by the basolateral PDZ protein Scribble. Nature 403, 676-680 (2000).
7. Goehring, N. W., Grill, S. W. Cell polarity: mechanochemical patterning. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 72-80 (2013).
8. Rodriguez-Boulan, E., Macara, I. G. Organization and execution of the epithelial polarity programme. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 225-242 (2014).
9. Boxem, M. et al. A protein domain-based interactome network for C. elegans early embryogenesis. Cell 134, 534-545 (2008).
10. Vidalain, P.-O., Boxem, M., Ge, H., Li, S., Vidal, M. Increasing specificity in highthroughput yeast two-hybrid experiments. Methods 32, 363-370 (2004).
11. Walhout, A. J., Vidal, M. A genetic strategy to eliminate self-activator baits prior to high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screens. Genome Res. 9, 1128-1134 (1999).
12. Cho, A. et al. WormNet v3: a network-assisted hypothesis-generating server for Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W76-W82 (2014).
13. Braun, P. et al. An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions. Nat. Methods 6, 91-97 (2009).
14. Rolland, T. et al. A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. Cell 159, 1212-1226 (2014).
15. Waaijers, S., Koorman, T., Kerver, J., Boxem, M. Identification of human protein interaction domains using an ORFeome-based yeast two-hybrid fragment library. J. Proteome Res. 12, 3181-3192 (2013).
16. Eyckerman, S. et al. Design and application of a cytokine-receptor-based interaction trap. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 1114-1119 (2001).
17. Lemmens, I., Lievens, S., Tavernier, J. MAPPIT, a mammalian two-hybrid method for in-cell detection of protein-protein interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. 1278, 447-455 (2015).
18. Simonis, N. et al. Empirically controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interactome network. Nat. Methods 6, 47-54 (2009).
19. Stetak, A., Hörndli, F., Maricq, A. V., van den Heuvel, S., Hajnal, A. Neuron-specific regulation of associative learning and memory by MAGI-1 in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 4, e6019 (2009).
20. Gunsalus, K. C. et al. Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis. Nature 436, 861-865 (2005).
21. Boulton, S. J. et al. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295, 127-131 (2002).
22. Tu, Z. et al. Integrating siRNA and protein-protein interaction data to identify an expanded insulin signaling network. Genome Res. 19, 1057-1067 (2009).
23. Wang, L., Tu, Z., Sun, F. A network-based integrative approach to prioritize reliable hits from multiple genome-wide RNAi screens in Drosophila. BMC Genomics 10, 220 (2009).
24. Wildwater, M., Sander, N., de Vreede, G., van den Heuvel, S. Cell shape and Wnt signaling redundantly control the division axis of C. elegans epithelial stem cells. Development 138, 4375-4385 (2011).
25. Winter, J. F. et al. Caenorhabditis elegans screen reveals role of PAR-5 in RAB-11-recycling endosome positioning and apicobasal cell polarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 666-676 (2012).
26. Grant, B., Hirsh, D. Receptor-mediated endocytosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 4311-4326 (1999).
27. Balklava, Z., Pant, S., Fares, H., Grant, B. D. Genome-wide analysis identifies a general requirement for polarity proteins in endocytic traffic. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1066-1073 (2007).
28. Maniar, T. A. et al. UNC-33 (CRMP) and ankyrin organize microtubules and localize kinesin to polarize axon-dendrite sorting. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 48-56 (2012).
29. Wu, X., Pang, E., Lin, K., Pei, Z.-M. Improving the measurement of semantic similarity between gene ontology terms and gene products: insights from an edgeand IC-based hybrid method. PLoS ONE 8, e66745 (2013).
30. Gottfried, I., Ehrlich, M., Ashery, U. The Sla2p/HIP1/HIP1R family: similar structure, similar function in endocytosis? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 187-191 (2010).
31. Parker, J. A. et al. Huntingtin-interacting protein 1 influences worm and mouse presynaptic function and protects Caenorhabditis elegans neurons against mutant polyglutamine toxicity. J. Neurosci. 27, 11056-11064 (2007).
32. Liu, J. et al. The C. elegans SYS-1 protein is a bona fide-catenin. Dev. Cell 14, 751-761 (2008).
33. Phillips, B. T., Kidd, A. R., King, R., Hardin, J., Kimble, J. Reciprocal asymmetry of SYS-1/beta-catenin and POP-1/TCF controls asymmetric divisions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3231-3236 (2007).
34. Cuppen, E., van der Linden, A. M., Jansen, G., Plasterk, R. H. A. Proteins interacting with Caenorhabditis elegans Galpha subunits. Comp. Funct. Genomics 4, 479-491 (2003).
35. Hoege, C. et al. LGL can partition the cortex of one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryos into two domains. Curr. Biol. 20, 1296-1303 (2010).
36. Beatty, A., Morton, D., Kemphues, K., The, C. elegans homolog of Drosophila Lethal giant larvae functions redundantly with PAR-2 to maintain polarity in the early embryo. Development 137, 3995-4004 (2010).
37. Khan, L. A. et al. Intracellular lumen extension requires ERM-1-dependent apical membrane expansion and AQP-8-mediated flux. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 143-156 (2013).
38. Göbel, V., Barrett, P. L., Hall, D. H., Fleming, J. T. Lumen morphogenesis in C. elegans requires the membrane-cytoskeleton linker erm-1. Dev. Cell 6, 865-873 (2004).
39. Armenti, S. T., Chan, E., Nance, J. Polarized exocyst-mediated vesicle fusion directs intracellular lumenogenesis within the C. elegans excretory cell. Dev. Biol. 394, 110-121 (2014).
40. Berkowitz, L. A., Strome, S. MES-1, a protein required for unequal divisions of the germline in early C. elegans embryos, resembles receptor tyrosine kinases and is localized to the boundary between the germline and gut cells. Development 127, 4419-4431 (2000).
41. Bei, Y. et al. SRC-1 and Wnt signaling act together to specify endoderm and to control cleavage orientation in early C. elegans embryos. Dev. Cell 3, 113-125 (2002).
42. Hoffmann, M., Segbert, C., Helbig, G., Bossinger, O. Intestinal tube formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires vang-1 and egl-15 signaling. Dev. Biol. 339, 268-279 (2010).
43. Honnen, S. J. et al. C. elegans VANG-1 modulates life span via insulin/IGF-1-like signaling. PLoS ONE 7, e32183 (2012).
44. Sanchez-Alvarez, L. et al. VANG-1 and PRKL-1 cooperate to negatively regulate neurite formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002257 (2011).
45. Anderson, D. C., Gill, J. S., Cinalli, R. M., Nance, J. Polarization of the C. elegans embryo by RhoGAP-mediated exclusion of PAR-6 from cell contacts. Science 320, 1771-1774 (2008).
46. Chan, E., Nance, J. Mechanisms of CDC-42 activation during contact-induced cell polarization. J. Cell Sci. 126, 1692-1702 (2013).
47. Chevray, P. M., Nathans, D. Protein interaction cloning in yeast: identification of mammalian proteins that react with the leucine zipper of Jun. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5789-5793 (1992).
48. Vidal, M., Brachmann, R. K., Fattaey, A., Harlow, E., Boeke, J. D. Reverse two-hybrid and one-hybrid systems to detect dissociation of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10315-10320 (1996).
49. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-110 (2008).
50. Schiestl, R. H., Gietz, R. D. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr. Genet. 16, 339-346 (1989).
51. Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8, 175-185 (1998).
52. Hibbs, M. A. et al. Exploring the functional landscape of gene expression: directed search of large microarray compendia. Bioinformatics 23, 2692-2699 (2007).
53. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014); http://www.R-project.org.
54. Lin, Y.-C. et al. Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nat. Commun. 5, 4767 (2014).
55. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71-94 (1974).
56. Lamesch, P. et al. C. elegans ORFeome version 3.1: increasing the coverage of ORFeome resources with improved gene predictions. Genome Res. 14, 2064-2069 (2004).
57. Fraser, A. G. et al. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature 408, 325-330 (2000).
58. D'Agostino, I., Merritt, C., Chen, P.-L., Seydoux, G., Subramaniam, K. Translational repression restricts expression of the C. elegans Nanos homolog NOS-2 to the embryonic germline. Dev. Biol. 292, 244-252 (2006).
59. Praitis, V. Creation of transgenic lines using microparticle bombardment methods. Methods Mol. Biol. 351, 93-107 (2006).
60. Schonegg, S., Hyman, A. A. CDC-42 and RHO-1 coordinate acto-myosin contractility and PAR protein localization during polarity establishment in C. elegans embryos. Development 133, 3507-3516 (2006).
61. Orchard, S. et al. The MIntAct project-IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D358-D363 (2014).