Social wasps are a saccharomyces mating nest

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 2247-2251

  Stefanini, Irene ^a   Dapporto, Leonardo ^b   Berń, Luisa ^c   Polsinelli, Mario ^d   Turillazzi, Stefano ^d   Cavalieri, Duccio ^a,d  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

^c INSTITUT PASTEUR DE MONTEVIDEO   (Uruguay)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hybrids; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces paradoxus; Social wasps; Yeasts

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; BACTERIAL SPORE; BREEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; GERMINATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; INSECT; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; INTESTINE; MATING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS; SPOROGENESIS; WASP; YEAST; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; CROSS BREEDING; FUNGUS SPORE; GENETICS; INTESTINE FLORA; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CROSSES, GENETIC; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPORES, FUNGAL; WASPS;

EID: 84959196138     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516453113     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cavalieri D, McGovern PE, Hartl DL, Mortimer R, Polsinelli M (2003) Evidence for S. cerevisiae fermentation in ancient wine. J Mol Evol 57(Suppl 1):S226-S232.
2. Stefanini I, et al. (2012) Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(33):13398-13403.
3. Cubillos FA, Vásquez C, Faugeron S, Ganga A, Martínez C (2009) Self-fertilization is the main sexual reproduction mechanism in native wine yeast populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67(1):162-170.
4. Sebastiani F, Barberio C, Casalone E, Cavalieri D, Polsinelli M (2002) Crosses between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus generate fertile hybrids. Res Microbiol 153(1):53-58.
5. Murphy HA, Zeyl CW (2010) Yeast sex: Surprisingly high rates of outcrossing between asci. PLoS One 5(5):e10461.
6. Gray JC, Goddard MR (2012) Sex enhances adaptation by unlinking beneficial from detrimental mutations in experimental yeast populations. BMC Evol Biol 12:43.
7. Burke MK, Liti G, Long AD (2014) Standing genetic variation drives repeatable experimental evolution in outcrossing populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Evol 31(12):3228-3239, 10.1093/molbev/msu256.
8. Magwene PM (2014) Revisiting Mortimer's Genome Renewal Hypothesis: Heterozygosity, homothallism, and the potential for adaptation in yeast. Adv Exp Med Biol 781:37-48.
9. Kelly AC, Wickner RB (2013) Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A sexy yeast with a prion problem. Prion 7(3):215-220.
10. Ramazzotti M, Berná L, Stefanini I, Cavalieri D (2012) A computational pipeline to discover highly phylogenetically informative genes in sequenced genomes:application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural strains. Nucleic Acids Res 40(9): 3834-3848.
11. Johnson LJ, et al. (2004) Population genetics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics 166(1):43-52.
12. Christiaens JF, et al. (2014) The fungal aroma gene ATF1 promotes dispersal of yeast cells through insect vectors. Cell Reports 9(2):425-432.
13. Reuter M, Bell G, Greig D (2007) Increased outbreeding in yeast in response to dispersal by an insect vector. Curr Biol 17(3):R81-R83.
14. Ruderfer DM, Pratt SC, Seidel HS, Kruglyak L (2006) Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat Genet 38(9):1077-1081.
15. Polsinelli M, Romano P, Suzzi G, Mortimer R (1996) Multiple strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a single grape vine. Lett Appl Microbiol 23(2):110-114.
16. Engel P, Moran NA (2013) The gut microbiota of insects - diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(5):699-735.
17. Mortimer RK, Romano P, Suzzi G, Polsinelli M (1994) Genome renewal: A new phenomenon revealed from a genetic study of 43 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from natural fermentation of grape musts. Yeast 10(12):1543-1552.
18. Ramírez M, Ambrona J (2008) Construction of sterile ime1Delta-transgenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts unable to disseminate in nature. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(7):2129-2134.
19. Strich R, Khakhina S, Mallory MJ (2011) Ume6p is required for germination and early colony development of yeast ascospores. FEMS Yeast Res 11(1):104-113.
20. Akhtar M (1982) Studies on digestive enzymes of some orthopteriod insects. Pakistan Entomol. 4(1-2):33-38.
21. Morales L, Dujon B (2012) Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76(4):721-739.
22. Liti G, et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458(7236): 337-341.
23. Sweeney J, Kuehne H, Sniegowski P (2004) Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles. FEMS Yeast Res 4(4-5):521-525.
24. Charron G, Leducq J-B, Bertin C, Dubé AK, Landry CR (2014) Exploring the northern limit of the distribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus in North America. FEMS Yeast Res 14(2):281-288.
25. Maclean CJ, Greig D (2008) Prezygotic reproductive isolation between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus. BMC Evol Biol 8:1.
26. Smith EN, Kruglyak L (2008) Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol 6(4):e83.
27. Strope PK, et al. (2015) The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res 25(5):762-774.
28. Stelkens RB, Brockhurst MA, Hurst GD, Miller EL, Greig D (2014) The effect of hybrid transgression on environmental tolerance in experimental yeast crosses. J Evol Biol 27(11):2507-2519.
29. Piatkowska EM, Naseeb S, Knight D, Delneri D (2013) Chimeric protein complexes in hybrid species generate novel phenotypes. PLoS Genet 9(10):e1003836.
30. Plech M, de Visser JA, Korona R (2014) Heterosis is prevalent among domesticated but not wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 4(2):315-323.
31. Paradis E (2010) pegas: An R package for population genetics with an integratedmodular approach. Bioinformatics 26(3):419-420.
32. Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P (2002) Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Mol Ecol 11(6):1103-1114.
33. David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J (2007) Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol Ecol 16(12):2474-2487.
34. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
35. Rose M, Winston F, Hieter P (1990) Methods in yeast genetics-a laboratory manual.Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY.
36. Masneuf I, Hansen J, Groth C, Piskur J, Dubourdieu D (1998) New hybrids between Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(10):3887-3892.