The effect of hybrid transgression on environmental tolerance in experimental yeast crosses

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2507-2519

  Stelkens, R B ^a   Brockhurst, M A ^b   Hurst, G D D ^a   Miller, E L ^c   Greig, D ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Saccharomyces; Environmental clines; Hybridization; Relative fitness; Speciation; Transgressive segregation

Indexed keywords

BIOACCUMULATION; BIOASSAY; DIVERGENCE; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); TOLERANCE; YEAST;

ANIMALIA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CROSSES, GENETIC; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84913614681     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12494     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J.W., Baird, S.J.E., Bierne, N. et al. 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 229-246.
2. Albertson, R.C. & Kocher, T.D. 2005. Genetic architecture sets limits on transgressive segregation in hybrid cichlid fishes. Evolution 59: 686-690.
3. Anton, K.A., Ward, J.R. & Cruzan, M.B. 2013. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral morphology: evidence for transgressive evolution in a derived hybrid lineage. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 660-673.
4. Arnold, M.L. 2006. Evolution through genetic exchange, Oxford.
5. Arnold, M.L. & Martin, N.H. 2010. Hybrid fitness across time and habitats. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 530-536.
6. Brede, N., Sandrock, C., Straile, D., Spaak, P., Jankowski, T., Streit, B. et al. 2009. The impact of human-made ecological changes on the genetic architecture of Daphnia species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 4758-4763.
7. Buerkle, C.A., Morris, R.J., Asmussen, M.A. & Rieseberg, L.H. 2000. The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity 84: 441-451.
8. Cardinale, B.J., Matulich, K.L., Hooper, D.U., Byrnes, J.E., Duffy, E., Gamfeldt, L. et al. 2011. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98: 572-592.
9. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
10. Cubillos, F.A., Louis, E.J. & Liti, G. 2009. Generation of a large set of genetically tractable haploid and diploid Saccharomyces strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 9: 1217-1225.
11. Cubillos, F.A., Billi, E., Zörgo, E., Parts, L., Fargier, P., Omholt, S. et al. 2011. Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol. Ecol. 20: 1401-1413.
12. Czypionka, T., Cheng, J., Pozhitkov, A. & Nolte, A.W. 2012. Transcriptome changes after genome-wide admixture in invasive sculpins (Cottus). Mol. Ecol. 21: 4797-4810.
13. DeVicente, M.C. & Tanksley, S.D. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596.
14. Dittrich-Reed, D.R. & Fitzpatrick, B.M. 2012. Transgressive hybrids as hopeful monsters. Evol. Biol. 40: 310-315.
15. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetic nature of species differences. Am. Nat. 71: 404-420.
16. Dujon, B.Y. 2010. Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 512-524.
17. Gompert, Z., Fordyce, J.A., Forister, M., Shapiro, A.M. & Nice, C.C. 2006. Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science 314: 1923-1925.
18. Gow, J.L., Peichel, C.L. & Taylor, E.B. 2007. Ecological selection against hybrids in natural populations of sympatric threespine sticklebacks. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 2173-2180.
19. Greig, D., Louis, E.J., Borts, R.H. & Travisano, M. 2002. Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 298: 1773-1775.
20. Greig, D., Travisano, M., Louis, E.J. & Borts, R.H. 2003. A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 429-437.
21. van't Hof, A.E., Edmonds, N., Dalikova, M., Marec, F. & Saccheri, I.J. 2011. Industrial melanism in British peppered moths has a singular and recent mutational origin. Science 332: 958-960.
22. Hou, J., Friedrich, A., de Montigny, J. & Schacherer, J. 2014. Chromosomal rearrangements as a major mechanism in the onset of reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 24: 1153-1159.
23. Hunter, N., Chambers, S., Louis, E. & Borts, R. 1996. The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J. 15: 1726-1733.
24. Jiggins, C.D., Salazar, C., Linares, M. & Mavarez, J. 2008. Hybrid trait speciation and Heliconius butterflies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, Biol. Sci. 363: 3047-3054.
25. Johansen-Morris, A.D. & Latta, R.G. 2006. Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: Hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation. Evolution 60: 1585-1595.
26. Johnston, J.A., Donovan, L.A. & Arnold, M.L. 2004. Novel phenotypes among early generation hybrids of two Louisiana iris species: flooding experiments. J. Ecol. 92: 967-976.
27. Keller, I., Wagner, C.E., Greuter, L., Mwaiko, S., Selz, O.M., Sivasundar, A. et al. 2013. Population genomic signatures of divergent adaptation, gene flow and hybrid speciation in the rapid radiation of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Mol. Ecol. 22: 2848-2863.
28. Knox, R., Clarke, F., Clarke, J., Fox, S., DePauw, R. & Singh, A. 2012. Enhancing the identification of genetic loci and transgressive segregants for preharvest sprouting resistance in a durum wheat population. Euphytica 186: 193-206.
29. Kuczyńska, A., Surma, M. & Adamski, T. 2007. Methods to predict transgressive segregation in barley and other self-pollinated crops. J. Appl. Genet. 48: 321-328.
30. Kunte, K., Shea, C., Aardema, M.L., Scriber, J.M., Juenger, T.E., Gilbert, L.E. et al. 2011. Sex chromosome mosaicism and hybrid speciation among tiger swallowtail butterflies. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002274.
31. Kwon-Chung, K.J. & Chang, Y.C. 2012. Aneuploidy and drug resistance in pathogenic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 8: e1003022.
32. Latour, Y., Perriat-Sanguinet, M., Caminade, P., Boursot, P., Smadja, C.M. & Ganem, G. 2014. Sexual selection against natural hybrids may contribute to reinforcement in a house mouse hybrid zone. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281: 20132733.
33. Lenski, R.E., Rose, R.R., Simpson, S.C. & Tadler, S.C. 1991. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2000 generations. Am. Nat. 38: 1315-1341.
34. Lexer, C., Welch, M.E., Raymond, O. & Rieseberg, L.H. 2003. The origin of ecological divergence in Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae): selection on transgressive characters in a novel hybrid habitat. Evolution 57: 1989-2000.
35. Lidzbarsky, G.A., Shkolnik, T. & Nevo, E. 2012. Adaptive response to DNA-damaging agents in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations from ''Evolution Canyon'', Mt. Carmel, Israel. PLoS ONE 4: e5914.
36. Liti, G., Peruffo, A., James, S.A., Roberts, I.N. & Louis, E.J. 2005. Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR-retrotransposons and telomeric-associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Yeast 22: 177-192.
37. Liti, G., Carter, D.M., Moses, A.M., Warringer, J., Parts, L., James, S.A. et al. 2009. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
38. Lynch, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
39. Macnair, M.R. 1989. A new species of Mimulus endemic to the copper mines in California. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 100: 1-14.
40. Mallet, J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279-283.
41. Marullo, P., Bely, M., Masneuf-Pomarede, I., Pons, M., Aigle, M. & Dubourdieu, D. 2006. Breeding strategies for combining fermentative qualities and reducing off-flavor production in a wine yeast model. FEMS Yeast Res. 6: 268-279.
42. Müller, H.J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6: 71-125.
43. Muller, L.A.H. & McCusker, J.H. 2009. A multispecies-based taxonomic microarray reveals interspecies hybridization and introgression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 9: 143-152.
44. Nice, C.C., Gompert, Z., Fordyce, J.A., Forister, M.L., Lucas, L.K. & Buerkle, C.A. 2012. Hybrid speciation and independent evolution in lineages of alpine butterflies. Evolution 67: 1055-1068.
45. Nolte, A.W., Freihof, J., Stemshorn, K.C. & Tautz, D. 2005. An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp. (Pisces, Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridisation between old phylogeographic groups. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272: 2379-2387.
46. Parsons, K.J., Son, Y.H. & Albertson, R.C. 2011. Hybridization promotes evolvability in African cichlids: connections between transgressive segregation and phenotypic integration. Evol. Biol. 38: 306-315.
47. Pavelka, N., Rancati, G., Zhu, J., Bradford, W.D., Saraf, A., Florens, L. et al. 2010. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468: 321-325.
48. Plech, M., de Visser, J.A.G.M. & Korona, R. 2014. Heterosis is prevalent among domesticated but not wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 4: 315-323.
49. Pritchard, V.L., Knutson, V.L., Lee, M., Zieba, J. & Edmands, S. 2013. Fitness and morphological outcomes of many generations of hybridization in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 416-433.
50. Rieseberg, L.H., Archer, M.A. & Wayne, R.K. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363-372.
51. Rieseberg, L.H., Raymond, O., Rosenthal, D.M., Lai, Z., Livingstone, K., Nakazato, T. et al. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
52. Rosenthal, D.M., Rieseberg, L.H. & Donovan, L.A. 2005. Re-creating ancient hybrid species' complex phenotypes from early-generation synthetic hybrids: three examples using wild sunflowers. Am. Nat. 166: 26-41.
53. Roux, C., Castric, V., Pauwels, M., Wright, S.I., Saumitou-Laprade, P. & Vekemans, X. 2011. Does speciation between Arabidopsis halleri and Arabidopsis lyrata coincide with major changes in a molecular target of adaptation? PLoS ONE 6: e26872.
54. Ruderfer, D.M., Pratt, S.C., Seidel, H.S. & Kruglya, L. 2006. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat. Genet. 38: 1077-1081.
55. Seehausen, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 198-207.
56. Selmecki, A.M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L.E., Anderson, J.B. & Berman, J. 2009. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000705.
57. Shapira, R., Levy, T., Shaked, S., Fridman, E. & David, L. 2014. Extensive heterosis in growth of yeast hybrids is explained by a combination of genetic models. Heredity 113: 316-326.
58. Shivaprasad, P.V., Dunn, R.M., Santos, B.A.C.M., Bassett, A. & Baulcombe, D.C. 2012. Extraordinary transgressive phenotypes of hybrid tomato are influenced by epigenetics and small silencing RNAs. EMBO J. 31: 257-266.
59. Slatkin, M. & Lande, R. 1994. Segregation variance after hybridization of isolated populations. Genet. Res. 64: 51-56.
60. Stelkens, R.B. & Seehausen, O. 2009. Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids. Evolution 63: 884-897.
61. Stelkens, R.B., Schmid, C., Selz, O. & Seehausen, O. 2009. Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 283.
62. Svedin, N., Wiley, C., Veen, T., Gustafsson, L. & Qvarnstrom, A. 2008. Natural and sexual selection against hybrid flycatchers. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275: 735-744.
63. The Heliconius Genome Consortium 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94-98.
64. Trier, C.N., Hermansen, J.S., Saetre, G.-P. & Bailey, R.I. 2014. Evidence for mito-nuclear and sex-linked reproductive barriers between the hybrid Italian sparrow and its parent species. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004075.
65. Vamosi, S.M., Hatfield, T. & Schluter, D. 2000. A test of ecological selection against young-of-the-year hybrids of sympatric sticklebacks. J. Fish Biol. 57: 109-121.
66. Warringer, J., Zörgo, E., Cubillos, F.A., Zia, A., Gjuvsland, A., Simpson, J.T. et al. 2011. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002111.
67. Welch, M.E. & Rieseberg, L.H. 2002. Habitat divergence between a homoploid hybrid sunflower species, Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae), and its progenitors. Am. J. Bot. 89: 472-478.
68. Wu, C.A., Lowry, D.B., Cooley, A.M., Wright, K.M., Lee, Y.W. & Willis, J.H. 2008. Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100: 220-230.
69. Zörgö, E., Gjuvsland, A., Cubillos, F.A., Louis, E.J., Liti, G., Blomberg, A. et al. 2012. Life history shapes trait heredity by accumulation of loss-of-function alleles in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 1781-1789.
70. Zörgö, E., Chwialkowska, K., Gjuvsland, A.B., Garre, E., Sunnerhagen, P., Liti, G. et al. 2013. Ancient evolutionary trade-offs between yeast ploidy states. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003388.