Phylogeny of the Cecropieae (Urticaceae) and the evolution of an ant-plant mutualism

Systematic Botany

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 56-66

  Treiber, Erin L ^a   Gaglioti, André Luiz ^b   Romaniuc Neto, Sergio ^b   Madriñán, Santiago ^c   Weiblen, George D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Institute of Botany   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

Author keywords

ancestral state reconstruction; Cecropia; EPIC markers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959098000     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364416X690633     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Baird, N. A., P. D. Etter, T. S. Atwood, M. C. Currey, A. L. Shiver, Z. A. Lewis, E. U. Selker, W. A. Cresko, and E. A. Johnson. (2008). Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One. 3: e3376.
2. Barth, M. O. (1976). Catalogo sistematico dos polens das plantas arboreas do Brasil Meridional. XXIV. Urticaceae. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 74: 341-346.
3. Barth, M. O. (1984). Surface morphology of Brazilian Moraceae pollen grains. Boletim IG-USP. Serie Cientifica. 15: 142-150.
4. Berg, C. C. (1978). Cecropiaceae a new family of the Urticales. Taxon. 27: 39-44.
5. Berg, C. C., R. W. A. P. Akkermans, and E. C. H. Heusden. (1990). Cecropiaceae: Coussapoa and Pourouma, with an introduction to the Family. Flora Neotropica, Monograph 51. New York: The New York Botanical Garden
6. Berg, C. C, and P. Franco-Rosselli. (2005). Cecropia. Flora Neotropica, Monograph 94. New York: The New York Botanical Garden
7. Bergsten, J. (2005) A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics. 21: 163-193.
8. Bonsen, K. J. (1990). Anatomy. Pp. 8-10 in Cecropiaceae: Coussapoa and Pourouma, with an introduction to the family. Flora Neotropica, Monograph 51, eds. J. L. Luteyn, S. A. Mori, M. L. Lebron-Luteyn, and E. C. H. Heusden. New York: The New York Botanical Garden
9. Bonsen, K. J, and B. J. H. T.Welle. (1983). Comparative wood and leaf anatomy of the Cecropiaceae (Urticales). Bulletin de Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Section B. Adansonia: Botanique Phytochemie. 5: 151-177.
10. Bronstein, J. L. (1998). The contribution of ant-plant studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica. 30: 150-161.
11. Bronstein, J. L., R. Alarcón, and M. Geber. (2006). The evolution of plantinsect mutualisms. The New Phytologist. 172: 412-428.
12. Burnham, R. J, and A. Graham. (1999). Neotropical vegetation: New developments and status. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 86: 546-589.
13. Burnham, R. J, and K. R. Johnson. (2004). South American palaeobotany and the origins of Neotropical forests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 359: 1595-1610.
14. Chen, C. J., Q. Lin, I. Friis, C. M. Wilmot-Dear, and A. K. Monro. (2003). Urticaceae. Pp. 76-189 in Flora of China, eds. Z.-Y. Wu and P. H. Raven. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press
15. Chew, W. L. (1963) A revision of the genus Poikilospermum. The Gardens'. Bulletin, Singapore. 20: 1-104.
16. Clement, W. L. (2008). Phylogeny and pollination ecology of Castilleae (Moraceae): Investigating the evolutionary history of the figs' closest relatives. Ph. D. Thesis. Saint Paul: University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
17. Clement, W. L, and G. D. Weiblen. (2009). Morphological evolution in the mullberry family (Moraceae). Systematic Botany. 34: 530-552.
18. Conn, B. J, and J. T. Hadiah. (2009). Nomenclature of tribes within the Urticaceae. Kew Bulletin. 64: 349-352.
19. Corner, E. J. H. (1962). The classification of Moraceae. Gardens'. Bulletin, Singapore. 19: 187-252.
20. Datwyler, S. L, and G. D. Weiblen. (2004). On the origin of the fig: Phylogenetic relationships of Moraceae from ndhF sequences. American Journal of Botany. 91: 767-777.
21. Davidson, D. W, and D. McKey. (1993). Ant-plant symbioses: Stalking the chuyachaqui. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 8: 326-332.
22. Dejean, A., F. Petitclerc, O. Roux, J. Orivel, and C. Leroy. (2012). Does exogenic food benefit both partners in an ant-plant mutualism?. The case of Cecropia obtusa and its guest Azteca plant-Ants. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 335: 214-219.
23. Dumortier, B. C. (1829). Cl. 3. Torosepalea. Pp. 14-17 in Analyse Familles des Plantes, eds. B. C. Dumortier. Tournay: Imprimerie De J. Casterman
24. Eaton, D. A. R, and R. H. Ree. (2013). Inferring phylogeny and introgression using RADseq data: An example from flowering plants (Pedicularis: Orobanchaceae). Systematic Biology. 62: 689-706.
25. Emerson, K. J., C. R. Merz, J. M. Catchen, P. A. Hohenlohe, W. A. Cresko, W. E. Bradshaw, and C. M. Holzapfel. (2010). Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-Throughput sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 107: 16196-16200.
26. Engler, H. G. A. (1889). Ulmaceae, Moraceae, Urticaceae. Pp. 59-118 in Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten, insbesondere den Nutzflanzen, unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher hervorragender Fachgelehrten begründet, eds. H. G. A. Engler and K. A. E. Prantl. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann
27. Font Quer, P. (1985). Diccionario de botanica. Barcelona: Editorial Labor S.A.
28. Gangadhera, M, and J. A. Inamdar. (1977). Trichomes and stomata, and their taxonomic significance in the Urticales. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 127: 121-137.
29. Gaudichaud, C. (1830). Urticaceae. Pp. 491-514 in Voyage autour du monde, entrepris par ordre du roi, . . .exucute sur les corvettes de S. M. I'Uranie t la Physicienne, pendant les annees 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820; publie par M. Louis de Freycinet. Botanique, eds. C. Gaudichaud. Paris: Chez Pillet Aine
30. Guérin, P. (1923). Les urticacees: Cellules a mucilage, lactiferes et canaux secreteurs. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 70: 125-263.
31. Hadiah, J, and B. Conn. (2009). Usefulness of morphological characters for infrageneric classification of Elatostema (Urticaceae). Blumea-Biodiversity. Evolution and Biogeography of Plants. 54: 181-191.
32. Hadiah, J. T., B. J. Conn, and C. J. Quinn. (2008). Infra-familial phylogeny of Urticaceae, using chloroplast sequence data. Australian Systematic Botany. 21: 375-385.
33. Hickey, L. J. (1973) A revised classification of architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany. 60: 17-33.
34. Huelsenbeck, J. P, and F. Ronquist. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 17: 754-755.
35. Humphries, C. J, and S. Blackmore. (1989) A review of the classification of the Moraceae. Pp. 264-277 in Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Higher Hamamelidae, eds. P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore. Oxford: Clarendon Press
36. Janzen, D, and D. McKey. (1977). Musanga cecropiodes is a Cecropia without its ants. Biotropica. 9: 57.
37. Kachroo, P, and M. M. Bhat. (1981). Leaf anatomy of Urticales. Journal of Economic and Taxonic Botany. 2: 45-64.
38. Kearse, M., R. Moir, A. Wilson, S. Stones-Havas, M. Cheung, S. Sturrock, S. Buxton, A. Cooper, S. Markowitz, C. Duran, T. Thierer, B. Ashton, P. Mentjies, and A. Dummond. (2012). Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28: 1647-1649.
39. Latteman, T. A., J. E.Mead, M. A. DuVall, C. C. Bunting, and J. M. Bevington. (2014). Differences in anti-herbivore defenses in non-myrmecophyte and myrmecophyte Cecropia trees. Biotropica. 46: 652-656.
40. Lengyel, S., A. D. Gove, A. M. Latimer, J. D. Majer, and R. R. Dunn. (2009). Ants sow the seeds of global diversification in flowering plants. PLoS One. 4: e5480.
41. Machado, C. A, and J. Hey. (2003). The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 270: 1193-1202.
42. Maddison, D. R, and W. P. Maddison. (2015). Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.7. http://mesquiteproject.org
43. Metcalfe, C. R, and L. Chalk. (1950). Anatomy of the dicotyledons: leaves, stem and wood in relation to taxonomy with notes on economic uses. Oxford: Clarendon Press
44. Miller, M. A., W. Pfeiffer, and T. Schwartz. (2010). Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana: 1-8.
45. Monro, A. K. (2006). The revision of species-rich genera: A phylogenetic framework for the strategic revision of Pilea (Urticaceae) based on cpDNA, nrDNA, and morphology. American Journal of Botany. 93: 426-441.
46. O'Dowd, D. (1982). Pearl bodies as ant food: An ecological role for some leaf emergences of tropical plants. Biotropica. 14: 40-49.
47. Olmstead, R. G, and J. A. Sweere. (1994). Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology. 43: 467-481.
48. Radford, A. E., W. C. Dickison, J. R. Massey, and C. R. Bell. (1974). Vascular plant systematics. New York: Harper and Row
49. Romaniuc-Neto, S. (1999). Cecropioideae (C.C. Berg) Romaniuc Neto stat. nov. (Moraceae-Urticales). Albertoa, nova serie. 4: 13-16.
50. Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Hohna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard, and J. P. Huelsenbeck. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 61: 539-542.
51. Rubin, B. E. R., R. H. Ree, and C. S. Moreau. (2012). Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data. PLoS One. 7: e33394.
52. Ruiter, G. (1976). Revision of the genera Myrianthus and Musanga (Moraceae). Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique. 46: 471-510.
53. Sagers, C., S. Ginger, and R. Evans. (2000). Carbon and nitrogen isotopes trace nutrient exchange in an ant-plant mutualism. Oecologia. 123: 582-586.
54. Salisbury, B. A, and J. Kim. (2001). Ancestral state estimation and taxon sampling density. Systematic Biology. 50: 557-564.
55. Setochi, H., H. Tobe, H. Ohba, and M. Okazaki. (1993). Silicon-Accumulating idioblasts in leaves of Cecropiaceae (Urticales). Journal of Plant Research. 106: 327-335.
56. Soltis, D. E, and P. S. Soltis. (2004). Amborella not a basal angiosperm?. Not so fast. American Journal of Botany. 91: 997-1001.
57. Sorsa, P, and P. Huttunen. (1975). On the pollen morphology of the Urticaceae. Annales Botanici Fennici. 12: 165-182.
58. Trager, M. D., S. Bhotika, J. A. Hostetler, G. V. Andrade, M. A. Rodriguez-Cabal, C. S. McKeon, C. W. Osenberg, and B. M. Bolker. (2010). Benefits for plants in ant-plant protective mutualisms: A meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 5: e14308.
59. Trécul, A. (1847). Sur la famille des Artocarpées. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Botanique. 3: 38-157.
60. Wagner, C. E., I. Keller, S. Wittwer, O. M. Selz, S. Mwaiko, L. Greuter, A. Sivasundar, and O. Seehausen. (2012). Genome-wide RAD sequence data provide unprecedented resolution of species boundaries and relationships in the Lake Victoria cichlid adaptive radiation. Molecular Ecology. 22: 1-12.
61. Weber, M. G, and A. Agrawal. (2014). Defense mutualisms enhance plant diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 111: 16442-16447.
62. Weiblen, G. D, and E. L. Treiber. (2015). Evolutionary origins and diversification of mutualism. Pp. 37-56 in Mutualism, eds. J. L. Bronstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press
63. Welle, B. J. H., K. Bonsen, and P. Detienne. (1992). Cecropiaceae, Urticaceae. Pp. 141-188 in Flora of the Guianas, eds. A. R. A. Gorts-Van Rijn. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books
64. Wu, Z.-Y., A. K. Monro, R. I. Milne, H. Wang, T.-S. Yi, J. Liu, and D.-Z. Li. (2013). Molecular phylogeny of the nettle family (Urticaceae) inferred from multiple loci of three genomes and extensive generic sampling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 69: 812-827.
65. Xu, S. (2000). Phylogenetic analysis under reticulate evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 17: 897-907.
66. Yao, X., C. Li, and C. W. Dick. (2013). Exon-primed intron-crossing (EPIC) markers for evolutionary studies of Ficus and other taxa in the fig family (Moraceae). Applications in Plant Sciences. 1: 1300037.
67. Zerega, N. J. C., W. L. Clement, S. L. Datwyler, and G. D. Weiblen. (2005). Biogeography and divergence times in the mulberry family (Moraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 37: 402-416.