Work more and play less? Time use impacts of changing ecosystem services: The case of the invasive emerald ash borer

Ecological Economics

Volumn 124, Issue , 2016, Pages 49-58

  Jones, Benjamin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological disruption; Emerald ash borer; Invasive species; Labor leisure decision; Time use; Trees

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; DECIDUOUS TREE; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIVE SPECIES; LABOR MARKET; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; TIME ALLOCATION;

UNITED STATES;

AGRILUS PLANIPENNIS; FRAXINUS;

EID: 84959018562     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Angrist J.D., Krueger A.B. Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments (Working Paper No. 8456) 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research.
2. Angrist J.D., Pischke J. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion 2009, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Aukema J.E., Leung B., Kovacs K., Chivers C., Britton K.O., Englin J., Von Holle B. Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. PLoS One 2011, 6(9).
4. Bäck D., Kuminoff N.V., Van Buren E., Van Buren S. National Evidence on Air Pollution Avoidance Behavior (Working Paper) 2014.
5. Becker G.S. A theory of the allocation of time. Econ. J. 1965, 493-517.
6. Brown J.E., Dunn P.K. Comparisons of tobit, linear, and Poisson--gamma regression models an application of time use data. Sociol. Methods Res. 2011, 40(3):511-535.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS] American Time Use Survey User's Guide: Understanding ATUS 2003-2013 2014.
8. Cardinale B.J., Duffy J.E., Gonzalez A., Hooper D.U., Perrings C., Venail P., Naeem S. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012, 486(7401):59-67.
9. Cardoso A.R., Fontainha E., Monfardini C. Children's and parents' time use: empirical evidence on investment in human capital in France, Germany and Italy. Rev. Econ. Househ. 2010, 8(4):479-504.
10. Cawley J., Liu F. Maternal employment and childhood obesity: a search for mechanisms in time use data. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2012, 10(4):352-364.
11. City of Boulder, CO Emerald Ash Borer Retrieved from. https://bouldercolorado.gov/parks-rec/emerald-ash-borer.
12. Cook D.C., Thomas M.B., Cunningham S.A., Anderson D.L., De Barro P.J. Predicting the economic impact of an invasive species on an ecosystem service. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17(6):1832-1840.
13. Coombes E., Jones A.P., Hillsdon M. The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 70(6):816-822.
14. Cragg J.G. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica 1971, 39(5):829-844.
15. Crowl T.A., Crist T.O., Parmenter R.R., Belovsky G., Lugo A.E. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6(5):238-246.
16. Dalmazzone S., Giaccaria S. Economic drivers of biological invasions: a worldwide, bio-geographic analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 105:154-165.
17. Donovan G., Butry D., Michael Y., Prestemon J., Liebhold A., Gatzilois D., Mao M. The relationship between trees and human health: evidence from the spread of the emerald ash borer. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 44:139-145.
18. Donovan G.H., Michael Y.L., Gatziolis D., Prestemon J.P., Whitsel E.A. Is tree loss associated with cardiovascular-disease risk in the Women's Health Initiative? A natural experiment. Health Place 2015, 36:1-7.
19. Ellaway A., Macintyre S., Bonnefoy X. Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. BMJ 2005, 331:611-612.
20. Elmendorf W. The importance of trees and nature in community: a review of the relative literature. Arboricult. Urban For. 2008, 34:152-156.
21. European Environment Agency The Impacts of Invasive Alien Species in Europe 2012, (Copenhagen, Denmark).
22. Foster G., Kalenkoski C.M. Tobit or OLS? An empirical evaluation under different diary window lengths. Appl. Econ. 2013, 45(20):2994-3010.
23. Frazis H., Stewart J. How to think about time-use data: what inferences can we make about long-and short-run time use from time diaries?. Annals of Economics and Statistics 2012, 105/106:231-245.
24. Frumkin H. The evidence of nature and the nature of evidence. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 44(2):196-197.
25. Gallien L., Münkemüller T., Albert C.H., Boulangeat I., Thuiller W. Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here?. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16(3):331-342.
26. Gandhi K.J., Smith A., Hartzler D.M., Herms D.A. Indirect effects of emerald ash borer-induced ash mortality and canopy gap formation on epigaeic beetles. Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43(3):546-555.
27. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2012, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. seventh ed.
28. Herms D.A., McCullough D.G. Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59:13-30.
29. Herms D.A., McCullough D.G., Smitley D.R., Sadof C.S., Cranshaw W. Insecticide Options for Protecting Ash Trees From Emerald Ash Borer 2014, (North Central IPM Center). second ed.
30. Hobden D.W., Laughton G.E., Morgan K.E. Green space borders-a tangible benefit? Evidence from four neighbourhoods in Surrey, British Columbia, 1980-2001. Land Use Policy 2004, 21(2):129-138.
31. Jones A.M. Health econometrics. Handbook of Health Economics 2000, 1 A:265-344. (New York: North Holland). C. A.J., J.P. Newhouse (Eds.).
32. Jones B.A., McDermott S.M. Linking environmental management to health outcomes: a case study of the emerald ash borer. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2015, 22(17):1409-1414.
33. Kalenkoski C.M., Ribar D.C., Stratton L.S. Parental child care in single-parent, cohabiting, and married-couple families: time-diary evidence from the United Kingdom. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005, 194-198.
34. Katsanevakis S., Wallentinus I., Zenetos A., Leppäkoski E., Çinar M.E., Oztürk B., Cardoso A.C. Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a pan-European review. Aquat. Invasions 2014, 9(4):391-423.
35. Kimmel J., Connelly R. Mothers' time choices caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work. J. Hum. Resour. 2007, 42(3):643-681.
36. Kovacs K.F., Haight R.G., McCullough D.G., Mercader R.J., Siegert N.W., Liebhold A.M. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009-2019. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:569-578.
37. Measuring the Subjective Well-being of Nations: National Accounts of Time Use and Well-being 2009, University of Chicago Press. A.B. Krueger (Ed.).
38. Kuo F.E. The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. J. Arboric. 2003, 29:148-155.
39. Maas J., Van Dillen S.M., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place 2009, 15(2):586-595.
40. MacFarlane D.W., Meyer S.P. Characteristics and distribution of potential ash tree hosts for emerald ash borer. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 213(1):15-24.
41. Mazza G., Tricarico E., Genovesi P., Gherardi F. Biological invaders are threats to human health: an overview. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 26(2-3):112-129.
42. McCullough D.G., Mercader R.J. Evaluation of potential strategies to SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) caused by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis): SLAM in an urban forest. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2012, 58(1):9-23.
43. McDermott S.M., Finnoff D.C., Shogren J.F. The welfare impacts of an invasive species: endogenous vs. exogenous price models. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 85:43-49.
44. McLaughlan C., Gallardo B., Aldridge D.C. How complete is our knowledge of the ecosystem services impacts of Europe's top 10 invasive species?. Acta Oecol. 2014, 54:119-130.
45. Meyer B.D. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1995, 13(2):151-161.
46. Nilsson K., Sangster M., Gallis C., Hartig T., De Vries S., Seeland K. Forests, Trees and Human Health 2011, Springer Science & Business Media. K. Nilsson, M. Sangster, C. Gallis, T. Hartig, S. de Vries, K. Seeland, J. Schipperijn (Eds.).
47. Pejchar L., Mooney H.A. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24(9):497-504.
48. Perrings C., Williamson M., Barbier E.B., Delfino D., Dalmazzone S., Shogren J., Watkinson A. Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conserv. Ecol. 2002, 6(1):1.
49. Pienkowski T., Williams S., McLaren K., Wilson B., Hockley N. Alien invasions and livelihoods: economic benefits of invasive Australian Red Claw crayfish in Jamaica. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 112:68-77.
50. Pimentel D. Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species 2011, CRC Press, London, UK. second ed.
51. Poland T.M., McCullough D.G. Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America's ash resource. J. For. 2006, 104(3):118-124.
52. Popham F., Mitchell R. Relation of employment status to socioeconomic position and physical activity types. Prev. Med. 2007, 45(2):182-188.
53. Pyšek P., Richardson D.M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2010, 35:25-55.
54. Ricciardi A., Palmer M.E., Yan N.D. Should biological invasions be managed as natural disasters?. Bioscience 2011, 61(4):312-317.
55. Roemmich J.N., Epstein L.H., Raja S., Yin L., Robinson J., Winiewicz D. Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Prev. Med. 2006, 43:437-441.
56. Settle C., Shogren J.F. Modeling native-exotic species within Yellowstone Lake. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2002, 1323-1328.
57. Sliwa S.A., Must A., Peréa F., Economos C.D. Maternal employment, acculturation, and time spent in food-related behaviors among Hispanic mothers in the United States. Evidence from the American Time Use Survey. Appetite 2015, 87:10-19.
58. Stewart J. Tobit or not Tobit?. IZA Discussion Paper #4588 2009.
59. Sydnor T.D., Bumgardner M., Subburayalu S. Community ash densities and economic impact potential of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in four Midwestern states. Arboricult. Urban For. 2011, 37:84-89.
60. Tudor-Locke C., Leonardi C., Johnson W.D., Katzmarzyk P.T. Time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors on the working day: the American time use survey. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 53(12):1382-1387.
61. Tuomainen U., Candolin U. Behavioural responses to human-induced environmental change. Biol. Rev. 2011, 86(3):640-657.
62. USDA Forest Service Emerald Ash Borer and Urban Trees Retrieved from:. http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/labnotes/?p=5480.
63. Vaara M., Matero J. Modeling daily outdoor recreation participation and time-use as a two-stage choice process: a Finnish example. Leis. Sci. 2011, 33(4):269-289.
64. Vannatta A.R., Hauer R.H., Schuettpelz N.M. Economic analysis of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) management options. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105(1):196-206.
65. Vilà M., Basnou C., Pyšek P., Josefsson M., Genovesi P., Gollasch S., Hulme P.E. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8(3):135-144.
66. Village of Lincolnshire, IL Emerald Ash Borer Management Plan Retrieved from. http://www.village.lincolnshire.il.us/sitemedia/documents/departments-services/environment-and-trees/et_eab-management.pdf.
67. Williams D.O. Ski towns scramble to cope with mountain pine beetle epidemic. The Colorado Independent 2008, April 11. (Retrieved from http://www.coloradoindependent.com/3536/ski-towns-scramble-to-cope-with-mountain-pine-beetle-epidemic).
68. World Health Organization Connecting Global Priorities: Biodiversity and Human Health. A State of Knowledge Review 2015, (Geneva, Switzerland).