Community ash densities and economic impact potential of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in four midwestern states

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 84-89

  Sydnor, T Davis ^a   Bumgardner, Matthew ^b   Subburayalu, Sakthi ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agrilus planipennis; Ash tree density; Cost of ash tree removal replacement; EAB; Economic impact; Emerald ash borer; Fraxinus; Green ash; Survey; White ash

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; REFORESTATION; URBAN FORESTRY;

MIDWEST; UNITED STATES;

AGRILUS PLANIPENNIS; FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS AMERICANA;

EID: 79953724352     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anonymous. 2009. Cooperative EAB Program. Accessed 08/28/2009.
2. Burns, R.M., and B.H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990. Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, vol. 2, 877 pp.
3. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA). 2000. Guide for Plant Appraisal. ninth edition. Champaign, IL. 143 pp.
4. D'Amato, N.E., T.D. Sydnor, and D. Struve. 2002. Urban foresters identify Ohio's tree needs. Journal of Arboriculture 28: 291-301.
5. Herms, D.A. 2002. Strategies for deployment of insect resistant ornamental plants, pp. 217-237. In: M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutier, and T.D. Paine (Eds.). Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 332 pp.
6. Herms, D.A, D.G. McCullough, and D.R. Smitley. 2004. Under attack: the current status of the emerald ash borer infestation and the program to eradicate it. American Nurseryman. 200(7): 20-27.
7. Herms, D.A., D. Smitley, P. Bonello, and D. McCullough. 2005. Evaluation of resistance of Asian and North American ashes to emerald ash borer, p. 43. In: K .Gottschalk (Ed.). Proceedings, XV USDA Interagency Research Forum, on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species 2004. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-332. 98 pp.
8. Kovacs, K.P., R.G. Haight, D.G. McCullough, R.J. Mercader, N.W. Siegert, and A.M. Liebhold. 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009-2019. Ecological Economics 69: 569-578.
9. Landers, J. 2005. Emerald ash borer and controversy spreads in and around Michigan. Tree Care Industry 26(2): 66-70.
10. Malhotra, N.K. 1996. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 890 pp.
11. Schaar, C. 2008. Personal communication. Urban Forester, City of Toledo, Ohio.
12. Sydnor, T.D., M. Bumgardner, and A. Todd. 2007a. The potential economic impacts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) on Ohio, U.S., communities. Arboriculture & Urban. Forestry 33(1): 48-54.
13. Sydnor, T.D., R.F. Gooding, and B.L. Bishop. 2007b. Guide to Plant Appraisal of Trees and other Plants in Ohio, seventh edition. Ohio Chapter, International Society of Arboriculture, Columbus, OH. 40 pp.
14. Sydnor, T.D. and S. K. Subburayalu. 2009. Results of a survey of twentytwo Ohio urban foresters. City Trees 45(2): 32-37.
15. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Accessed 09/28/2009.
16. USDA Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS). 2003. Emerald Ash Borer; Quarantine and Regulations. Federal Register 66(198); 59082-91.
17. USDA Forest Service. Forest Inventory and Analysis Mapmaker 4.0. [Database]. Accessed 09/08/2009.