Research paradigms: Beyond product, process, and social activity

Handbook of Writing and Text Production

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 31-54

  Prior, Paul ^a   Thorne, Steven L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958930700     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Alač, Morana and Edwin Hutchins. 2004. I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4: 629-661.
2. Barsalou, Lawrence. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617-645.
3. Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bazerman, Charles (ed.). 2007. Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. New York: Taylor & Francis.
5. Bazerman, Charles and David Russell. 2003. Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse, http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/, last accessed on 14. 05. 20 13.
6. Berry, Patrick, Gail Hawisher and Cynthia Selfe. 2012. Transnational Literate Lives in Digital Times. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press, http://ccdigitalpress.org/transnational, last accessed on 14.05.2013.
7. Black, Rebecca. 2008. Adolescents and Online Fan Fiction. New York: Peter Lang.
8. Canagarajah, Suresh. 2000. A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
9. Canagarajah, Suresh. 2006. Toward a writing pedagogy of shuttling between language: Learning from multilingual writers. College English 68: 589-604.
10. Casanave, Christine. 2002. Writing Games: Multicultural Case Studies of Academic Literacy Practices in Higher Education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Castelló, Montserrat, Anna Iñesta and Mariona Corcelles. 2013. Ph. D. students' transitions between academic and disciplinary writing regulation: Learning to write a research article. Research in the Teaching of English 47: 442-478.
12. Chiseri-Strater, Elizabeth. 1991. Academic Literacies: The Public and Private Discourse of University Students. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
13. Cole, Michael and Yrjo Engeström. 1993. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Gabriel Salomon (ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, 111-138. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cope, Bill and Mary Kalantzis (eds.). 2000. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
15. Cowley, Stephen. 2007. The cognitive dynamics of distributed language. Language Sciences 29: 575-583.
16. Delcambre, Isabelle, Christiane Donahue and Domonique Lahanier-Reuter. 2010. Ruptures et continuités dans l'écriture à l'université. Scripta (Belo Horizonte) 13: 227-244.
17. Devitt, Amy. 2004. Writing Genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18. Emig, Janet. 1971. The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
19. Engeström, Yrjo (ed.). 1999. Perspectives on Activity Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Flower, Linda and John Hayes. 1981a. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32: 365-387.
21. Flower, Linda and John Hayes. 1981b. The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English 15: 229-243.
22. Flower, Linda and John Hayes. 1984. Images, plans and prose: The representation of meaningin writing. Written Communication 1: 120-160.
23. Foster, John. 2006. Writing with Authority: Students' Roles as Writers in Cross-National Perspective. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
24. Fraiberg, Steve. 2010. Composition 2.0: Toward a multilingual and multimodal framework. College Composition and Communication 62: 100-126.
25. Gee, James. 1992. The Social Mind: Language, Ideology, and Social Practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
26. Gee, James. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Second Edition. London: Taylor & Francis.
27. Halliday, Michael (M.A.K.) and Ruqiya Hassan. 1985. Language, Context and Text:Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Halliday, Michael (M.A.K.) and James Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.
29. Harris, Roy. 1986. The Origin of Writing. London: Duckworth.
30. Hayes, John. 1996. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In: C. Michael Levy and Sarah Ransdell (eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications, 1-27. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Hayes, John. 2005. New directions in writing theory. In: Charles MacArthur, Steve Graham and Jill Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 28-40. New York: Guilford Press.
32. Hayes, John. 2012. Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication 29: 369-388.
33. Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hilbert, Martin. 2011. The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy 35: 715-736.
35. Hutchins, Edward. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
37. Hyland, Ken. 2008. Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching 41: 543-562.
38. Ivanič, Roz. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
40. Kalantzis, Mary and Bill Cope. 2008. Language education and multiliteracies. In: Stephen May and Nancy Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language Education (2nd edition). Vol. 1: Language Policy and Political Issues in Education, 195-211. New York: Spring.
41. Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the New Medi aAge. New York: Routledge.
42. Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality:A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
43. Kress, Gunther and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
44. Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
45. Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
46. Lam, Eva. 2004. Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning and Technology 8: 44-65.
47. Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2012. Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for Applied Linguistics? Language Teaching 45: 202-214.
48. Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
49. Lea, Mary and Brian Street. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23: 157-172.
50. Lemke, Jay. 2000. Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activity, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7: 273-290.
51. Lillis, Theresa. 2001. Student Writing:Access, Regulation, Desire. London: Routledge.
52. MacArthur, Charles, Steve Graham and Jill Fitzgerald (eds.). 2005. Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press.
53. Malinowski, Bronislav. 1923. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
54. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151-167.
56. Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
57. New London Group. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Harvard Educational Review 66: 60-92.
58. Nystrand, Martin. 2005. The social and historical context of writing research. In: Charles MacArthur, Steve Graham and Jill Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 11-27. New York: Guilford Press.
59. O'Halloran, Kay (ed.). 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London/New York: Continuum.
60. Pennycook, Alastair. 2010. Language as Local Practice. New York: Routledge.
61. Perl, Sondra. 1979. The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of Writing 13: 317-336.
62. Perrin, Daniel. 2006. Progression analysis. An ethnographic, computer-based multi-method approach to investigate natural writing processes. In: LuukVan Waes, Mariëlle Leijten and Christine Neuwirth (eds.), Writing and Digital Media, 175-181. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
63. Perrin, Daniel. 2013. The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
64. Prior, Paul. 1998. Writing/Disciplinarity:A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Prior, Paul. 2009. From speech genres to mediated multimodal genre systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the question of writing. In: Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini and Deborah Figueredo (eds.), Genre in a Changing World, 17-34. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/, last accessed on 14.05.2013.
66. Prior, Paul. 2010. Remaking IO: Semiotic remediation in the design process. In: Paul Prior and Julie Hengst (eds.), Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice, 206-234. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
67. Prior, Paul and Julie Hengst (eds.). 2010. Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
68. Prior, Paul and Karen Lunsford. 2007. History of reflection and research on writing. In: Charles Bazerman (ed.), Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text, 81-96. New York: Taylor & Francis.
69. Prior, Paul and Spencer Schaffner. 2011. Bird identification as a family of activities: Motives, mediating artifacts, and laminated assemblages. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 39: 51-70.
70. Prior, Paul and Jody Shipka. 2003. Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In: Charles Bazerman and David Russell (eds.), Writing Selves, Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, 180-238. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity, http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/, last accessed on 14.05.2013.
71. Robinson-Pant, Anna and Brian Street. 2012. Students' and tutors' understanding of 'new' academic literacy practices. In: Montserrat Castello and Christiane Donahue (eds.), University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies, 71-92. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
72. Roozen, Kevin. 2009. "Fan fic-ing" English Studies: A case study exploring the interplay of vernacular literacies and disciplinary engagement. Research in the Teaching of English 44: 136-169.
73. Roozen, Kevin. 2010. The 'Poetry Slam', mathemagicians, and middle school earth: Tracing trajectories of actors and artifacts. In: Paul Prior and Julie Hengst (eds.), Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice, 24-51. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
74. Russell, David. 1997. Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication 14: 504-554.
75. Russell, David, Mary Lea, Jan Parker, Brian Street and Tiane Donahue. 2009. Exploring notions of genre in "Academic Literacies" and "Writing Across the Curriculum": Approaches across countries and contexts. In: Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini and Débora Figueiredo (eds.), Genre in a Changing World: Perspectives on Writing, 395-423. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/, last accessed 14. 05. 20 13.
76. Salomon, Gavriel. 1993. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Shipka, Jody and Bill Chewning. 2007. Live composition: Four variations of a telling. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 11(3), http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/11.3/topoi/prior-et-al/index.html, last accessed on 14.05.2013.
78. Shipka, Jody. 2011. Toward a Composition Made Whole. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
79. Smagorinsky, Peter (ed.). 2007. Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
80. Spivey, Michael. 2007. The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Street, Brian. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography, and Education. London, UK: Longman.
82. Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Swales, John. 2004. Research Genres. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84. Tardy, Christine. 2009. Building Genre Knowledge. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.
85. Thorne, Steven L. 2003. Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology 7(2): 38-67.
86. Thorne, Steven L. 2009. 'Community', semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity. Language Teaching 42: 81-94.
87. Thorne, Steven L. 2012. Gaming writing: Supervernaculars, stylization, and semiotic remediation. In: Greg Kessler, Ana Oskoz and Idoia Elola (eds.), Technology Across Writing Contexts and Tasks, 297-316. San Marcos, Texas: CALICO Monograph.
88. Thorne, Steven L., Ingrid Fischer and Xiaofei Lu. 2012. The semiotic ecology and linguistic complexity of an online game world. ReCALL Journal 24: 279-301.
89. Van Dijk, Jan. 2005. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage.
90. Witte. Steve. 1992. Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication 9: 237-308.
91. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. New York: MacMillian.