Stem cells and systems models: clashing views of explanation

Synthese

Volumn 193, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 873-907

  Fagan, Melinda Bonnie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Covering law; Explanation; Interdisciplinarity; Mechanisms; Stem cells; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958888749     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0776-3     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bechtel, W. (2011). Mechanism and biological explanation. Philosophy of Science, 78, 533–557.
2. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamson, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421–441.
3. Boogerd, F., Bruggeman, F., Hofmeyr, J.-H., & Westerhoff, H. (Eds.). (2007). Systems biology: Philosophical foundations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Braillard, P.-A., & Malaterre, C. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Explanation in biology: An enquiry into the diversity of explanatory patterns in the life sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
5. Brigandt, I. (2013). Systems biology and the integration of mechanistic explanation and mathematical explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 477–492.
6. Calvert, J., & Fujimura, J. H. (2011). Calculating life? Duelling discourses in interdisciplinary systems biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42, 155–163.
7. Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Darden, L. (2006). Reasoning in biological discoveries: Essays on mechanisms, interfield relations, and anomaly resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Fagan, M. (2012a). Waddington redux: Models and explanation in stem cell and systems biology. Biology and Philosophy, 27, 179–213.
10. Fagan, M. (2012b). The joint account of mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 79, 448–472.
11. Fagan, M. (2013a). Philosophy of stem cell biology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Fagan, M. (2013b). Philosophy of stem cell biology: An introduction. Philosophy Compass, 8, 1147–1158.
13. Furusawa, C., & Kaneko, K. (1998). Emergence of rules in cell society: Differentiation, hierarchy, and stability. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 60, 659–687.
14. Furusawa, C., & Kaneko, K. (2001). Theory of robustness of irreversible differentiation in a stem cell system: Chaos hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 209, 395–416.
15. Furusawa, C., & Kaneko, K. (2009). Chaotic expression dynamics implies pluripotency: When theory and experiment meet. Biology Direct, 4, 17. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-17.
16. Furusawa, C., & Kaneko, K. (2012). A dynamical-systems view of stem cell biology. Science, 338, 215–217.
17. Glennan, S. (1996). Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis, 44, 49–71.
18. Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.
19. Green, S. (Ed.). (in press). Systems biology: 5 Questions. Copenhagen: Automatic Press/VIP.
20. Green, S., Bechtel, W., & Levy, A. (2015). Design sans adaptation. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5, 15–29.
21. Green, S., Fagan, M., & Jaeger, J. (2015). Explanatory integration challenges in evolutionary systems biology. Biological Theory, 9, 18–35.
22. Gunawardena, J. (2010). Models in systems biology: The parameter problem and the meanings of robustness. In H. M. Lodhi & S. H. Muggleton (Eds.), Elements of computational systems biology (pp. 21–47). Hoboken: Wiley & Sons.
23. Hackett, J. A., & Surani, M. A. (2014). Regulatory principles of pluripotency: From the ground state up. Cell Stem Cell, 15, 416–430.
24. Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.
25. Huang, S. (2009a). Reprogramming cell fates: Reconciling rarity with robustness. Bioessays, 31, 546–560.
26. Huang, S. (2009b). Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: More than just noise. Development, 136, 3853–3862.
27. Huang, S. (2011a). Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. Trends in Genetics, 27, 55–62.
28. Huang, S. (2011b). Systems biology of stem cells: Three useful perspectives to help overcome the paradigm of linear pathways. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 366, 2247–2259.
29. Huang, S., Ernberg, I., & Kauffman, S. (2009). Cancer attractors: A systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. Seminars in Developmental Biology, 20, 869–876.
30. Huang, S., Guo, Y. P., May, G., & Enver, T. (2007). Bifurcation dynamics of cell fate decision in bipotent progenitor cells. Developmental Biology, 305, 695–713.
31. Jaeger, J., & Crombach, A. (2012). Life’s attractors: Understanding developmental systems through reverse engineering and in silico evolution. In O. Soyer (Ed.), Evolutionary systems biology (pp. 93–119). London: Springer.
32. Jaeger, J., Irons, D., & Monk, N. (2012). The inheritance of process: A dynamical systems approach. Journal of Experimental Zoology Series B (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 318B, 591–612.
33. Jaeger, J., & Sharpe, J. (2014). On the concept of mechanism in development. In A. Minelli & T. Pradeu (Eds.), Towards a theory of development (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Kaneko, K. (2011). Characterization of stem cells and cancer cells on the basis of gene expression profile stability, plasticity, and robustness. BioEssays, 33, 403–413.
35. Kaneko, K., Sato, K., Michiue, T., Okabayashi, K., Ohnuma, K., Danno, H., et al. (2008). Developmental potential for morphogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 310B, 492–503.
36. Kaneko, K., & Yomo, T. (1999). Isologous diversification for robust development of cell society. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 99, 243–256.
37. Kaplan, D., & Craver, C. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 78, 601–627.
38. Kauffman, S. (1969). Metabolic stability and epigenetics in randomly constructed genetic nets. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 22, 437–467.
39. Kauffman, S. (1971). Differentiation of malignant to benign cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 429–451.
40. Kauffman, S. (1973). Control circuits for determination and transdetermination. Science, 181, 310–318.
41. Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Kitano, H. (2002). Looking beyond the details: A rise in system-oriented approaches in genetics and molecular biology. Current Genetics, 41, 1–10.
43. Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48, 507–531.
44. Klipp, E., Liebermeister, W., Wierling, C., Kowald, A., Lehrach, H., & Herwig, R. (2009). Systems biology: A textbook. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
45. Knuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2013). Basic science through engineering? Synthetic modeling and the idea of biology-inspired engineering. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 158–169.
46. Laplane, L. (forthcoming). Cellule souche cancéreuses: Ontologies et therapies. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense and Sorbonne Université. To be published (in translation) by Harvard University Press.
47. Levy, A., & Bechtel, W. (2013). Abstraction and the organization of mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 80, 241–261.
48. Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.
49. MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2013a). Coupling simulation and experiment: The bimodal strategy in integrative systems biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 572–584.
50. MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2013b). Building simulations from the ground up: Modeling and theory in systems biology. Philosophy of Science, 80, 533–556.
51. MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2014). Strategies for coordinating experimentation and modeling in integrative systems biology. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 322B, 230–239.
52. Melton, D. A., & Cowan, C. (2009). Stemness: Definitions, criteria, and standards. In R. Lanza et al. (Eds.). Essentials of stem biology (2nd ed., pp. xxii–xxix). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Nagajima, A., & Kaneko, K. (2008). Regulative differentiation as bifurcation of interacting cell population. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 253, 779–787.
54. Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Nobel Assembly. (October 2012). Karolinska Institute. Press release, 8.
56. O’Malley, M., & Soyer, O. (2012). The roles of integration in molecular systems biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 58–68.
57. Ramalho-Santos, M., & Willenbring, H. (2007). On the origin of the term ‘stem cell’. Cell Stem Cell, 1, 35–38.
58. Salmon, W. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59. Strevens, M. (2008). Depth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
60. Strogatz, S. H. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry and engineering. New York: Perseus Books.
61. Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126, 663–676.
62. Thomson, J., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S., Waknitz, M., Swiergel, J., Marshall, V., et al. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282, 1145–1147.
63. Vierbuchen, T., & Wernig, M. (2011). Direct lineage conversions: Unnatural but useful? Nature Biotechnology, 29, 892–907.
64. Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes. London: Taylor & Francis.
65. Wang, J., Xu, L., Wang, E., & Huang, S. (2010). The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. Biophysical Journal, 99, 29–39.
66. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Zednik, C. (2008). Dynamical models and mechanistic explanations. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1454–1459). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
68. Zednik, C. (2011). The nature of dynamical explanation. Philosophy of Science, 78, 238–263.
69. Zhou, J. X., & Huang, S. (2010). Understanding gene circuits at cell-fates branch points for rational cell reprogramming. Trends in Genetics, 27, 55–62.
70. Zipori, D. (2004). The nature of stem cells. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 873–878.