Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews

Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 57-78

  Mikkola, Piia ^a   Lehtinen, Esa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VAASA   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958857889     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1075/z.186.03mik     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). "Brilliant. Next question...": Highgrade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(3), 235-262. DOI: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3303_1
2. Asmuss, B. (2008). Performance appraisal interviews: Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 408-429. DOI: 10.1177/0021943608319382
3. Beach, W. A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: "Okays" and 'official' priorities in medical interviews. In G. H. Morris, & R. J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 259-289). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden, & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 251-277). Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Clifton, J. (2012). Conversation analysis in dialogue with stocks of interactional knowledge: Facework and appraisal interviews. Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 283-311. DOI: 10.1177/0021943612436974
6. Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R., & Mondada, L. (2010). Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1700-1718. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006
7. Glenn, P., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication, 5(1), 3-22. DOI: 10.1177/1750481310390161
8. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
9. Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53-73. DOI: 10.1177/0957926507069457
10. Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511628221
11. Holt, E. (2010). The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513-1525. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011
12. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489457
13. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
14. Komter, M. (2006). Introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 195-200. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_1
15. Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). "Can you see the cystic artery yet?": A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.009 78
16. Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language & Communication, 28(2), 165-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.011
17. Lynch, M. (2002). Protocols, practices, and the reproduction of technique in molecular biology. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 203-220. DOI: 10.1080/00071310220133304
18. Mondada, L. (2006). Participants' online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117-129. DOI: 10.1177/1461445606059561
19. Mondada, L. (2012). Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 304-333. DOI: 10.1177/1468794112438149
20. Mortensen, K., & Lundsgaard, C. (2011). Preliminary notes on 'grooming the object': The example of an architectural presentation. In J. Buur (Ed.), Participatory Innovation Conference, 13th-15th January, Sønderborg, Denmark (pp. 91-96).
21. Nevile, M. (2004). Integrity in the airline cockpit: Embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(4), 447-480. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_3
22. Nielsen, M. F. (2012). Using artifacts in brainstorming sessions to secure participation and decouple sequentiality. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 87-109. DOI: 10.1177/1461445611427211
23. Nielsen, M. F., Nielsen, S. B., Gravengaard, G., & Due, B. (2012). Interactional functions of invoking procedure in institutional settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(11), 1457-1473. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.007
24. Robinson, J., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in primary-care encounters: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 253-298.
25. Ruusuvuori, J. (2000). Control in medical consultation: Practices of giving and receiving the reason for the visit in primary health care. Tampere: Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 16.
26. Ruusuvuori, J. (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor- patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52(7), 1093-1108. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00227-6
27. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Volume I. Edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735. DOI: 10.2307/412243
29. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289-327. DOI: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
30. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535-596.
31. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
32. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Svennevig, J. (2012). The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 53-66. DOI: 10.1177/1461445611427204
34. Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139-166.