Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work

Qualitative Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 304-333

  Mondada, Lorenza ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

inscriptions; multimodality; social interaction; transcription; video; visualizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862021453     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794112438149     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Auer P.Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.Text. 2005;25 (1): 7-36.
2. Auer P,Couper-Kuhlen E,Müller FLanguage in Time. The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:.
3. Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. Barton DHamilton MIvanic R, ed. London: Routledge; 2000:.
4. Bucciarelli LDesigning Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994:.
5. BuscherM (2005) Social life under the microscope?Sociological Research Onlinehttp://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/buscher.html10(1).
6. Buscher M.Vision in motion.Environment and Planning A. 2006;38 (2): 281-299.
7. Cuff DArchitecture: The Story of a Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991:.
8. Méthodologies d'analyse de situations coopératives de conception: Corpus Mosaic. Detienne FTraverso V, ed. Nancy: PUN; 2009:.
9. DiMatteo R,Robinson J,Heritage JC, et al.Correspondence among patients' self-reports, chart records, and audio/videotapes of medical visits.Health Communication. 2003;15:393-413.
10. Drew PTalk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. Drew PRaymond GWeinberg D, ed. London: Sage; 2006:63-80.
11. Garfinkel HWorking out Durkheim's Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2002:.
12. Garfinkel H,Lynch M,Livingston E.The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 1981;11:131-158.
13. Goodwin C.Recording human interaction in natural settings.Pragmatics. 1993;3:181-209.
14. Goodwin C.Professional vision.American Anthropologist. 1994;96 (3): 606-633.
15. Goodwin C.Practices of color classification.Mind, Culture, and Activity. 1999;7:1 62-2 82.
16. Goodwin C.Action and embodiment within situated human interaction.Journal of Pragmatics. 2000;32:1489-1522.
17. Goodwin C.Time in action.Current Anthropology. 2002;43:19-35.
18. Goody JThe Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977:.
19. Heath C.Preserving the consultation: medical record cards and professional conduct.Sociology of Health & Illness. 1982;4:56-74.
20. Heath CBody Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986:.
21. Heath C,Luff P.Documents and professional practices: 'bad' organisational reasons for 'good' clinical records. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work; 1996Boston; 1996. 354.
22. Heath C,Hindmarsh J,Luff PVideo in Qualitative Research. London: Sage; 2010:.
23. Henderson KOn Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
24. Iedema R.Resemiotization.Semiotica. 2001;137 (1): 23-39.
25. Ivarsson J.Developing the construction sight: architectural education and technological change.Visual Communication. 2010;9 (2): 171-191.
26. Jenkings KN,Barber N.Same evidence, different meanings: transformation of textual evidence in hospital new drugs committees.Text & Talk. 2006;26 (2): 169-189.
27. Kendon AConducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
28. Video-Analysis. Knoblauch H, ed. Bern: Lang; 2006:.
29. Kress GR,Van Leeuwen TMultimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London and New York: Arnold and Oxford University Press; 2001:.
30. Latour B.Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands.Knowledge and Society. 1986;6:1-40.
31. Latour B.On interobjectivity.Mind, Culture, and Activity. 1996;3 (4): 228-245.
32. LeBaronC (1998) Building communication: architectural gestures and the embodiment of new ideas. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
33. Livingston EAn Anthropology of Reading. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1995:.
34. LomaxHCaseyN (1998) Recording social life: reflexivity and video methodology. Sociological Research Online3(2). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/2/1.html.
35. Luff P,Heath C,Greatbatch D.Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen-based documentation in collaborative activity. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work; 1992Toronto; 1992. 163.
36. Lymer G.Demonstrating professional vision: the work of critique in architectural education.Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2009;16 (2): 145-171.
37. Lynch M.The externalized retina.Human Studies. 1988;11 (2/3): 201-234.
38. Representation in Scientific Practice. Lynch MWoolgar S, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990:.
39. Macbeth DMedia Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Jalbert PL, ed. Washington, DC: University Press of America; 1999:135-170.
40. Mondada LEspaces, savoirs et incertitudes. D'Alessandro CCharvolin FNovember VRémy E, ed. Paris: Belin; 2005:15-31.
41. Mondada LVideo Analysis. Knoblauch H, ed. Bern: Lang; 2006:51-68.
42. Mondada L.Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices.Discourse Studies. 2007;9 (6): 809-821.
43. MondadaL (2008a) Production du savoir et interactions multimodales. Une étude de la modélisation spatiale comme activité pratique située et incarné. Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances2(2): 267-289. Available at: http://www.cairn.info/revue-anthropologie-des-connaissances-2008-2-page-219.htm.
44. Mondada LDonnées orales, les enjeux de la transcription. Bilger M, ed. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan; 2008b:127-155.
45. MondadaL (2008c) Doing video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: videotaping institutional telephone calls. FQS (Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research)9(3). Available at: www.qualitative-research.net/.
46. Mondada L.Emergent focused interactions in public places: a systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space.Journal of Pragmatics. 2009;41:1977-1997.
47. Mondada LHandbook of Conversation Analysis. Sidnell JStivers T, ed. Blackwell-Wiley:;.
48. Moore RJ,Whalen J,Cabell Hankinson Gathman EOrganisation, Interaction and Practice. Llewellyn NHindmarsh J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
49. Murphy K.Collaborative imagining: the interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice.Semiotica. 2005;156 (1): 113-145.
50. Ochs E,Gonzales P,Jacoby SInteraction and Grammar. Ochs ESchegloff EThompson S, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:328-369.
51. Pomerantz AStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Atkinson JMHeritage J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:57-101.
52. Rawls A.Garfinkel's conception of time.Time & Society. 2005;14 (2-3): 163-190.
53. Robinson J D.Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings in doctor-patient consultation.Human Communication Research. 1998;25:98-124.
54. Roth W-M,Lawless DV.When up is down and down is up: body orientation, proximity, and gestures as resources.Language in Society. 2002;31:1-28.
55. Schmidt K,Wagner I.Ordering systems: coordinative practices and artefacts in architectural design and planning.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 2004;13 (5-6): 349-408.
56. Sellen A,Harper RHRThe Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001:.
57. Söderström ODes images pour agir. Le visuel en urbanisme. Lausanne: Payot; 2000:.
58. Streeck J.How to do things with things: objets trouvés and symbolization.Human Studies. 1996;19 (4): 365-384.
59. Streeck J,Kallmeyer W.Interaction by inscription.Journal of Pragmatics. 2001;33:465-490.
60. Street BLiteracy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:.
61. Suchman LWorkplace Studies. Luff PHindmarsh JHeath C, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000:29-45.
62. Vinck DEveryday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003:.
63. Vinck D.Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique.Revue française de sociologie. 1999;XL (2): 385-414.
64. Watson DRAnalysing Practical and Professional Texts. A Naturalistic Approach. London: Ashgate; 2010:.
65. Yaneva A.Scaling up and down: extraction trials in architectural design.Social Studies of Science. 2005;35 (6): 867-894.
66. Yaneva AThe Making of a Building: A Pragmatist Approach to Architecture. Bern: Lang; 2009:.