Integrity in the airline cockpit: Embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 447-480

  Nevile, Maurice ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144249336     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_3     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Adams, M. J., Tenney, Y. J., & Pew, R. W. (1995). Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems. Human Factors, 37, 85-104.
2. Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting applause. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 370-409). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Atkinson, J. M. (1985). Refusing invited applause: Preliminary observations from a case study of charismatic oratory. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue (pp. 161-181). London: Academic.
4. ATSB (Australian Transport Safety Bureau). (2001). Boeing 747-438, VH-OJH Bangkok, Thailand 23 September 1999. Investigation Report 199904538. Canberra, Australia: Department of Transport & Regional Services.
5. Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for 'casual' "Okay" usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
6. Beaumont, G. (2000). Situation awareness or metacognition? In A. R. Lowe & B. J. Hayward (Eds.), Aviation resource management. (Vol. 2, pp. 359-367). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
7. Bureau of Air Safety Investigation. (1996). Israel Aircraft Industries Westwind 1124 VH-AJS Alice Springs, NT, 27 April 1995. Investigation Report 9501246. Canberra, Australia: Department of Transport & Regional Development.
8. Button, G. (Ed.). (1993). Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology. London: Routledge.
9. Castellan, N. J., Jr. (Ed.). (1993). Individual and group decision making: Current issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42, 151-173.
11. Coulter, J. (1991). Cognition: "Cognition" in an ethnomethodological mode. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 176-195). London: Routledge.
12. Gushing, S. (1994). Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Degani, A., & Heymann, M. (2002). Formal verification of human-automation interaction. Human Factors, 44, 28-43.
14. Dekker, S. W. A. (2001 a). The disembodiment of data in the analysis of human factors accidents. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 39-57.
15. Dekker, S. W. A. (2001b). The re-invention of human error. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 247-265.
16. Engeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (Eds.). (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Faith, N. (1998). Black box (2nd ed.). London: Boxtree.
18. FSF (Flight Safety Foundation). (1995). Aircraft descended below minimum sector altitude and crew failed to respond to GPWS as chartered Boeing 707 flew into mountain in Azores. Accident Prevention, 52, 1-16.
19. FSF (Flight Safety Foundation). (1996). Commuter captain fails to follow emergency procedures after suspected engine failure, loses control of the aircraft during instrument approach. Accident Prevention, 53(4), 1-12.
20. FSF (Flight Safety Foundation). (1997). Flight crew's failure to perform landing checklist results in DC-9 wheels-up landing. Accident Prevention, 54(5), 1-16.
21. FSF (Flight Safety Foundation). (2002). Commuter aircraft strikes terrain during unstabilized, homemade approach. Accident Prevention, 59(6), 1-13.
22. Foushee, H. C. (1984). Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. American Psychologist, 39, 8, 885-893.
23. Frankel, R. (2000). "Captain, I was trying earlier to tell you that you made a mistake": Deference and demeanor at 30,000 feet. In J. K. Peyton, P. Griffin, W. Wolfram, & R. Fasold (Eds.), Language in action: New studies of language in society. Essays in honor of Roger W. Shuy (pp. 289-301). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
24. Galegher, J., Kraut, R. E., & Egido, C. (Eds.). (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Goodwin, C. ( 1981 ). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
26. Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62, 29-49.
27. Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-274.
28. Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Goodwin, C. (2000a). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
30. Goodwin, C. (2000b). Practices of seeing. Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157-182). London: Sage.
31. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61-95). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Goodwin, M. H. (1995). Assembling a response: Setting and collaboratively constructed work talk. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order; Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 173-186). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
33. Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work setting. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selling (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 436-461). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Grace, C., Pfister, P., & Wiggins, M. (2000). Theoretical taxonomies of cognitive human failure: A comparison between fixed, rotary wing, and glider aircraft. In B. Hayward & A. Lowe (Eds.), Aviation resource management. (Vol. 1, pp. 337-344). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
35. Harper, R. H. R., & Hughes, J. A. (1993). "What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop 'em hitting": Making technology work in air traffic control. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 127-144). London: Routledge.
36. Hayward, B. J., & Lowe, A. R. (Eds.). (2000). Aviation resource management (Vol. 1). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
37. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1996). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96-129). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Helmreich, R. L. (1994). Anatomy of a system accident: The crash of Avianca flight 052. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 265-284.
40. Helmreich, R. L. (1997, May). Managing human error in aviation. Scientific American, 62-67.
41. Helmreich, R. L., & Merritt, A. C. (2000). Safety and error management: The role of crew resource management. In B. J. Hayward & A. R. Lowe (Eds.), Aviation resource management (Vol. 1, pp. 107-119). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
42. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
43. Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2002). The tacit order of teamwork: Collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(2), 139-164.
44. Hutchins, E. (1990). The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 191-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
45. Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
46. Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Hutchins, E., & Palen, L. (1997). Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 23-40). Berlin: Springer.
48. Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a "standard maximum" silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166-196). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
49. Johnston, N., McDonald, N., & Fuller, R. (Eds.). (1994). Aviation psychology in practice. Aldershot, England: Avebury Technical.
50. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Kent Jones, R. (2003). Miscommunication between pilots and air traffic control. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27, 233-248.
52. Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambox, C. E. (Eds.). (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53. Krifka, M., Martens, S., & Schwarz, F. (2003). Group interaction in the cockpit: Some linguistic factors. In R. Dietrich (Ed.), Communication in high risk environments. Linguistische Berichte (Special Issue 12), 75-101. Hamburg, Germany: Buske Verlag.
54. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Linde, C. (1988). The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language and Society, 17, 375-399.
56. Lowe, A. R., & Hayward, B. J. (Eds.). (2000). Aviation resource management (Vol. 2). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
57. MacPherson, M. (1998). The black box: Cockpit voice recorder accounts of in-flight accidents. London: HarperCollins.
58. Malone, M. ( 1997). Worlds of talk: The presentation of self in everyday conversation. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
59. Maurino, D. E., Reason, J., Johnston, N., & Lee, R. B. (1995). Beyond aviation human factors: Safety in high technology systems. Aldershot, England: Avebury Aviation.
60. McAllister, B. (1997). Crew resource management: Awareness, cockpit efficiency and safety. Shrewsbury, England: Airlife.
61. McIlvenny, P. ( 1996). Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal audience participation in popular public discourse. Language in Society, 25, 27-60.
62. Mjøs, K. (2001). Communication and operational failures in the cockpit. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 323-340.
63. Morrow, D., Rodvold, M., & Lee, A. (1994). Nonroutine transactions in controller-pilot communication. Discourse Processes, 17, 235-258.
64. Mühlhäusler, P., & Harré, R. (1990). Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
65. Nevile, M. (2001). Understanding who's who in the airline cockpit: Pilots' pronominal choices and cockpit roles. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods (pp. 57-71). London: Continuum.
66. Nevile, M. (2002a). Analysis of transmissions from VH-MZK, Whyalla Airlines, May 31, 2000. Report for the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Department of Transport & Regional Services (Confidential Accident Investigation Document), Canberra, Australia.
67. Nevile, M. (2002b). Coordinating talk and non-talk activity in the airline cockpit. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 131-146.
68. Nevile, M. (2004). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
69. Nevile, M. (in press). You always have to land: Accomplishing the sequential organization of actions to land an airliner. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
70. Nevile, M., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2001 ). Cockpit voice recorder data from VH-AJS: A conversation analysis perspective. Report for the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Department of Transport & Regional Services (Confidential Accident Investigation Document) Canberra, Australia.
71. Nickerson, C., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (1996). At the intersection between grammar and pragmatics: A contrastive study of personal pronouns and other forms of address in Dutch and Italian. Language Sciences, 18, 743-764.
72. Ochs, E., Gonzales, R., & Jacoby, S. (1996). "When I come down I'm in the domain state": Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328-369). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
73. Pope, J. A. ( 1995, June). Comparing accident reports: Looking beyond causes to identify recurrent factors. Flight Safety Digest, 14(5), 1-8.
74. Psathas, G. (1990). The organization of talk, gaze, and activity in a medical interview. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 205-230). Washington, DC: The International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
75. Redding, R. E., & Seamster, T. L. (1994). Cognitive task analysis in air traffic controller and aviation crew training. In N. Johnston, N. McDonald, & R. Fuller (Eds.), Aviation psychology in practice (pp. 190-222). Aldershot, England: Avebury Technical.
76. Rendle-Short, J. (2002). Talk and action in the computer science seminar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Language Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
77. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. Resnick, L. B., Säljö, R., Pontecorvo, C., & Burge, B. (Eds.). (1997). Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition. Berlin: Springer.
79. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors, 37, 123-136.
80. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, 5-19.
81. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65, 535-596.
82. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
83. Shuy, R. W. (1993). Language evidence in distinguishing pilot error from product liability. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 100/101, 101-114.
84. Smith, K., & Hancock, P. A. (1995). Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37, 137-148.
85. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
86. Suchman, L. (1993). Technologies of accountability: Of lizards and aeroplanes. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 113-126). London: Routledge.
87. Suchman, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 35-60). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
88. Suchman, L. (1997). Centers of coordination: A case and some themes. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41-62). Berlin: Springer.
89. Sumwalt, R. L., & Watson, A. W. (1995). ASRS incident data reveal details of flight-crew performance during aircraft malfunctions. Flight Safety Digest, 14(10), 1-7.
90. Taggart, W. R. (1994). Crew resource management: Achieving enhanced flight operations. In N. Johnston, N. McDonald, & R. Fuller (Eds.), Aviation psychology in practice (pp. 309-339). Aldershot, England: Avebury Technical.
91. Watson, D. R. (1987). Interdisciplinary considerations in the analysis of pro-terms. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 261-289). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
92. Wellens, A. R. ( 1993). Group situation awareness and distributed decision making: From military to civilian applications. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 267-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
93. Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (1997). Human factors analysis of postaccident data: Applying theoretical taxonomies of human error. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 67-81.
94. Wiener, E. L., & Nagel, D. C. (Eds.). (1988). Human factors in aviation. San Diego: Academic.
95. Wilson, T. P., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1986). The structure of silence between turns in two-party conversation. Discourse Processes, 9, 375-390.
96. Wortham, S. E. F. (1994). Acting out participant examples in the classroom. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
97. Zotov, D. (2000). Pilot error: Cognitive failure analysis. In B. Hayward & A. Lowe (Eds.), Aviation resource management (Vol. 1, pp. 345-354). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.