Towards understanding and resolving the conflict related to the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) conservation with participatory management planning

Land Use Policy

Volumn 54, Issue , 2016, Pages 158-168

  Kovács, Eszter ^a,b   Fabók, Veronika ^a,b   Kalóczkai, Ágnes ^a,b,c   Hansen, Hans Peter ^d  

^a SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG)   (Hungary)

^c MTA CENTRE FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Hungary)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Central and Eastern Europe; Conflict resolution; Conservation conflict; Eastern Imperial Eagle; Hungary; Participatory planning; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RAPTOR; STAKEHOLDER;

HUNGARY;

AQUILA HELIACA;

EID: 84958237641     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anthony B., Moldovan D. Poised for engagement? Local communities and Macin Mountains National Park, Romania. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2008, 4:230-241.
2. Anthony B.P., Szabo A. Protected areas: conservation cornerstones or paradoxes? Insights from human-wildlife conflicts in Africa and Southeastern Europe. The Importance of Biological Interactions in the Study of Biodiversity 2011, 255-282. InTech Publishers, Rijeka. J. López-Pujol (Ed.).
3. Arnstein A. A ladder of citizenship participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1969, 26:216-233.
4. Arthur R., Kelkar N., Alcoverro T., Madhusudan M.D. Complex ecological pathways underlie perceptions of conflict between green turtles and fishers in the Lakshadweep Islands. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167:25-34.
5. Bagnoli P., Timo G., Kovács E. People and Biodiversity Policies, Impacts, Issues and Strategies for Policy Action 2008, OECD Publications, Paris.
6. Bazeley P., Jackson K. Qualitative Data Analysis with Nvivo 2013, Sage, London, 308 pp. second edition.
7. BirdLife International, 2013. Aquila heliaca. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013. e.T22696048A40763222. (accessed September 2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20132.RLTS.T22696048A40763222.en.
8. Blicharska M., Angelstam P. Conservation at risk: conflict analysis in the Białowiez˙a Forest, a European biodiversity hotspot. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2010, 6(1-2):68-74.
9. Booth E., Halseth G. Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: a case study of British Columbia communities. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:898-906.
10. Bro E., Arroyo B., Migot P. Conflict between grey partridge Perdix perdix hunting and hen harrier Circus cyaneus protection in France: a review. Wildl. Biol. 2006, 12:233-247.
11. Bulkeley H., Mol A.P.J. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environ. Values 2003, 12(2):143-154.
12. Cent J., Grodzińska-Jurczak M., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska A. Emerging multilevel environmental governance-a case of public participation in Poland. J. Nat. Conserv. 2014, 22:93-102.
13. Dahrendorf R. Toward a theory of social conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 1958, 2(2):170-183.
14. Deutsch M. A theory of cooperation and competition. Hum. Relat. 1949, 2:129-152.
15. Deutsch M. The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes 1973, Yale University Press, New Haven.
16. Dickman A.J. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. Anim. Conserv. 2010, 13:458-466.
17. Díez M.A., Etxano I., Garmendia E. Evaluating participatory processes in conservation policy and governance: lessons from a Natura 2000 pilot case study. Environ. Policy Gov. 2015, 25:125-138.
18. Freeman R. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach 1984, Pitman, Boston.
19. Grujčič I., Milijić V., Nonič D. Conflict management in protected areas: the Lazar Canyon natural monument Eastern Serbia. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2008, 4:219-229.
20. Hansen, H.P., Von Essen, E., Sriskandarajah, N. Citizens, values and experts: stakeholders: the inveigling factor of participatory democracy. In: Hansen, H.P., Nielsen, B.S., Sriskandarajah, N., Gunnarsson, E., (Eds.), Commons, Sustainability, Democratization Action Research and the Basic Renewal of Society. Routledge, New York, pp. 113-138.
21. Hart K. Green Direct Payments: Implementation Choices of Nine Member States and Their Environmental Implications 2015, IEEP, London.
22. Honneth A. The Struggle for Recognition-The Moral Grammar of Social Conflict 1995, Polity Press, Cambridge.
23. Horváth M., Szitta T., Firmánszky G., Solti B., Kovács A., Moskát C. Spatial variation in prey species composition and its possible effects on reproductive success in an expanding Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) population. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2010, 56(2):187-200.
24. Horváth M., Demeter I., Fatér I., Firmánszky G., Kleszó A., Kovács A., Szitta T., Tóth I., Zalai T., Bagyura J. Population dynamics of the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) in Hungary between 2001 and 2009. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 2011, (Suppl. 3):61-70.
25. Horváth, M., Bagyura, J., Fatér, I., Firmánszky, G., Juhász, T., Klébert, A., Pongrácz, Á., Prommer, M. Szelényi, B., Váczi, M., 2012. A Parlagisas-védelmi és Mérgezés-megelozési Munkacsoportok 2012. évi beszámolója. Heliaca 10, 6-11.
26. Horváth M., Szitta T., Bagyura J., Fatér I., Firmánszky G., Moskát C. Simultaneous effect of habitat and age on reproductive success of Imperial Eagles (Aquila heliaca) in Hungary. Ornis Hungarica 2014, 22(1):57-68.
27. Jones-Walters L., Çil A. Biodiversity and stakeholder participation. J. Nat. Conserv. 2011, 19:327-329.
28. Kiss G. Why should the public participate in environmental decision-making? Theoretical arguments for public participation. Period. Politech. 2014, 22:13-20.
29. Kloskowski J. Human-wildlife conflicts at pond fisheries in eastern Poland: perceptions and management of wildlife damage. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2011, 57:295-304.
30. Kovács A., Demeter I., Horváth M., Fülöp Gy., Frank T., Szilvácsku Zs. Imperial Eagle Management Guidelines 2005, MME/BirdLife Hungary, Budapest.
31. Kovács A., Demeter I., Fatér I., Bagyura J., Nagy K., Szitta T., Firmánszky G., Horváth M. Current efforts to monitor and conserve the Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca in Hungary. Ambio 2008, 37(6):457-459.
32. Kovács E., Kelemen E., Kalóczkai Á., Margóczi K., Pataki Gy., Gébert J., Málovics Gy., Bálint B., Roboz Á., Krasznai Kovács E., Mihók M. Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12:117-127.
33. KSH Földhasználat és állatállomány Magyarországon, 2010 (településsoros adatok), Magyarország mezogazdasága (ÁMÖ), 2010 2012, Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, Budapest.
34. Lawrence A. Experiences with participatory conservation in post-socialist Europe. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2008, 4:179-186.
35. Madden F. Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human-wildlife conflict. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2004, 9:247-257.
36. Madden F., McQuinn B. Conservation's blind spot: the case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 178:97-106.
37. Malatinszky Á., Ádám Sz., Saláta-Falusi, E., Saláta D., Penksza K. Planning management adapted to climate change effects in terrestrial wetlands and grasslands. Int. J. Glob. Warm. 2013, 5(3):311-325.
38. Marshall K., White R., Fischer A. Conflicts between humans over wildlife management: on the diversity of stakeholder attitudes and implications for conflict management. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16(11):3129-3146.
39. Martinez-Alier J. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
40. Messmer T.A. The emergence of human wildlife conflict management: turning challenges into opportunities. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2000, 45:97-102.
41. MME (Birdlife Hungary), 2010. Conservation of imperial eagles by managing human-eagle conflicts in Hungary. LIFE+ Nature & Biodiversity Technical Application Forms Part A-administrative information.
42. MME (Birdlife Hungary), 2013. A Jászság különleges madárvédelmi terület (HUHN10005) Natura 2000 fenntartási terve, szerk. Králl Attila, Budapest.
43. Morelli F. Quantifying effects of spatial heterogeneity of farmlands on bird species richness by means of similarity index pairwise. Int. J. Biodivers. 2013, 9 pp. Article ID 914837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/914837 (accessed November 2015).
44. Morelli F., Jerzak L., Tryjanowski P. Birds as useful indicators of high nature value (HNV) farmland in Central Italy. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 38:236-242.
45. Moore C.W. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict 2003, Jossez-Bass, A. Wiley Imprint, San Francisco. 3rd edition.
46. Niedziałkowski K., Blicharska M., Mikusinski G., Jedrzejewska B. Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieza National Park in Poland. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:314-329.
47. O'Rourke E. The reintroduction of the white-tailed sea eagle to Ireland: People and wildlife. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:129-137.
48. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods 2002, Sage, London.
49. Pellizzoni L. Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy. Environ. Values 2003, 12(2):195-224.
50. Rauschmayer F., van den Hove S., Koetz T. Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric?. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy 2009, 27:42-58.
51. Redpath S., Arroyo B., Leckie F., Bacon P., Bayfield N., Gutierrez R., Thirgood S. Using decision modelling to resolve human-wildlife conflicts: a case study with raptors and grouse. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:350-359.
52. Redpath S.M., Young J., Evely A., Adams W.M., Sutherland W.J., Whitehouse A., Amar A., Lambert R.A., Linnell J.D.C., Watt A., Gutiérrez R.J. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28(2):100-109.
53. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2417-2431.
54. Reed M.R., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Prell Ch Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C., Morris J. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1933-1949.
55. Rodela R., Udovč A. Participation in nature protection: Does it benefit the local community? A Triglav National park case study. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2008, 4:209-218.
56. SRA (Social Research Association), 2003. Ethical guidelines UHL. (assessed January 2016). http://the-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ethics03.pdf.
57. Stemler, S. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7(17). UHL. (accessed October, 2015). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp%3Fv=7%26n=17.
58. Švajda J. Participatory conservation in a post-communist context: the Tatra National Park and Biosphere Reserve, Slovakia. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2008, 4:200-208.
59. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Earthscan, London and Washington. P. Kumar (Ed.).
60. Thirgood S., Redpath S. Hen harriers and red grouse: science, politics and human-wildlife conflict. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:1550-1554.
61. Treves A., Wallace R.B., Naugthon-Treves L., Morales A. Co-managing human-wildlife conflicts: a review. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2006, 11:383-396.
62. Treves A., Wallace R.B., White S. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23(6):1577-1587.
63. Václavíková M., Václavík T., Kostkan V. Otters vs. fishermen: stakeholders' perceptions of otter predation and damage compensation in the Czech Republic. J. Nat. Conserv. 2011, 19:95-102.
64. Vatn A. Institutions and the Environment 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
65. White R.M., Fischer A., Marshall K., Travis J.M.J., Webb T.J., di Falco S., Redpath S.M., van der Wal R. Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:242-253.
66. Young J., Richards C., Fischer A., Halada L., Kull T., Kuzniar A., Tartes U., Uzunov Y., Watt A. Conflicts between Biodiversity Conservation and Human Activities in the Central and Eastern European Countries. Ambio 2007, 36(7):545-550.
67. Young J.C., Marzano M., White R.M., McCracken D.I., Redpath S.M., Carss D.N., Quine C.P., Watt D. The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies. Biodiversity Conservation 2010, 19:3973-3990.
68. Young J.C., Jordan A., Searle K.R., Butler A., Chapman D.S., Simmons P., Watt A.D. Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?. Biological Conservation 2013, 158:359-370.
69. Zimmermann A., Walpole M.J., Leader-Williams N. Cattle ranchers' attitudes to conflicts with jaguar Panthera onca in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx 2005, 39(4):406-412.