Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts

Land Use Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 242-253

  White, Rehema M ^a   Fischer, Anke ^b   Marshall, Keith ^b   Travis, Justin M J ^c   Webb, Thomas J ^d   di Falco, Salvatore ^e   Redpath, Steve M ^c   van der Wal, René ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Biodiversity management; Conflict; Conservation; Hunting; Interdisciplinarity; Scottish uplands

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOINDICATOR; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; HUNTING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NATURE CONSERVATION; UPLAND REGION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 56849134565     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ajzen I. Attitude theory and the attitude-behavior relation. In: Krebs D., and Schmidt P. (Eds). New Directions in Attitude Measurement (1993), De Gruyter, Berlin 41-57
2. Alston L.J., Libecap G.D., and Mueller B. Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 39 (2000) 162-188
3. Antunes, P., Santos, R., Videira, N., 2006. Participatory decision making for sustainable development-the use of mediated modelling techniques. In: Rauschmayer, F., Wittmer, H. (Eds.), Resolving Environmental Conflicts: Combining Participation and Multi-Criteria Analysis. Land Use Policy 23, 44-52.
4. Arce D.G., and Sandler T. An evolutionary game approach to fundamentalism and conflict. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 159 (2003) 132-154
5. Bengston D.N., Xu G., and Fan D.P. Attitudes toward ecosystem management in the United States, 1992-1998. Soc. Nat. Res. 14 (2001) 471-487
6. Bennett E., Neiland A., Anang E., Bannerman P., Rahman A.A., Huq S., Bhuiya S., Day M., Fulford-Gardiner M., and Clerveaux W. Towards a better understanding of conflict management in tropical fisheries: evidence from Ghana, Bangladesh and the Caribbean. Mar. Policy 25 (2001) 365-376
7. Bojórquez-Tapia L.A., Ongay-Delhumeau E., and Ezcurra E. Multivariate approach for suitability assessment and environmental conflict resolution. J. Environ. Manage. 41 (1994) 187-198
8. Bojórquez-Tapia L.A., de la Cueva H., Díaz S., Melgarejo D., Alcantar G., Solares M.J., Grobet G., and Cruz-Bello G. Environmental conflicts and nature reserves: redesigning Sierra San Pedro Mártir National Park, Mexico. Biol. Conserv. 117 (2004) 111-126
9. Brouwer R., and Van Ek R. Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 50 (2004) 1-21
10. Buckner J. The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. Am. J. Community Psychol. 16 (1988) 771-791
11. Burdge R.J., and Vanclay F. Social impact assessment: a contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assess. 14 (1996) 59-86
12. Charnley S. The northwest forest plan as a model for broad-scale ecosystem management: a social perspective. Conserv. Biol. 20 (2006) 330-340
13. Clark T.W., Paquet P.C., and Curlee A.P. General lessons and positive trends in large carnivore conservation. Conserv. Biol. 10 (1996) 1055-1058
14. Clark T.W., Curlee A.P., and Reading R.P. Crafting effective solutions to the large carnivore conservation problem. Conserv. Biol. 10 (1996) 940-948
15. Conover M. Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts, the Science of Wildlife Damage Management (2002), Lewis Publishers, CAC press, Boca Raton, USA
16. Dray A., Perez P., Jones N., Le Page C., D'Aquino P., White I., and Auatabu T. The AtollGame experience: from knowledge engineering to a computer-assisted role playing game. J. Artif. Soc. Social Simulat. 9 (2006) 1
17. Drechsler, M., Grimm, V., Myšiak, J., Wätzold, F. 2005. Differences and similarities between ecological and economic models for biodiversity conservation, UFZ discussion paper 5/2005. Leipzig: UFZ Centre for Environmental Research, Germany. URL: http://www.ufz.de/data/Disk_Papiere_2005-052464.pdf.
18. Dunning Jr. J.B., Stewart D.J., Danielson B.J., Noon B.R., Root T.L., Lamberson R.H., and Stevens E.E. Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses. Ecol. Appl. 5 (1995) 3-11
19. Emerson K., Nabatchi T., O'Leary R., and Stephens J. The challenges of environmental conflict resolution. In: O'Leary R., and Bingham L.B. (Eds). The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution (2003), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 3-26
20. Endter-Wada J., Blahna D., Krannich R., and Brunson M. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 8 (1998) 891-904
21. Etheridge B., Summers R.W., and Green R.E. The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 34 (1997) 1081-1105
22. FEMAT, 1993, Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
23. Fischer A., and Van der Wal R. Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird: the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biol. Conserv. 135 (2007) 256-267
24. Fischer A., Petersen L., Feldkötter C., and Huppert W. Sustainable governance of natural resources and institutional change-an analytical framework. Pub. Admin. Dev. 27 (2007) 123-137
25. Frey D., Stahlberg D., and Gollwitzer P. Einstellung und verhalten: die theorie des überlegten handelns und die theorie des geplanten verhaltens. In: Frey D., and Irle M. (Eds). Kognitive Theorien der Sozialpsychologie (1993), Huber, Bern 361-395
26. Fulton D.C., Manfredo M.J., and Limpscomb J. Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Hum. Dimens. Wildlife 1 (1996) 24-47
27. Gaertner S., Dovidio J., and Bachman B. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: the induction of a common ingroup identity. Int. J. Intercult. Rel. 20 (1996) 271-190
28. Gaston K.J. Macroecology and people. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5 (2004) 303-307
29. Germain R.H., and Floyd D.W. Developing resource-based social conflict models for assessing the utility of negotiation in conflict resolution. For. Sci. 45 (1999) 394-406
30. Grace J.B. Structural Equation Modelling and Natural Systems (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Graham K., Beckerman A.P., and Thirgood S. Human-predator-prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management. Biol. Conserv. 122 (2005) 159-171
32. Grootaert, C., Van Bastelaer, T., 2001, Understanding and measuring social capital: a synthesis of findings from the social capital initiative. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 24. The World Bank, Social Development Family, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Network.
33. Hellstrom, E., 2001, Conflict cultures-qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry, Silva Fennica Monographs 2. The Finnish Society of Forest Science, The Finnish Research Institute.
34. Hirshleifer J. The Dimensions of Power as Illustrated in a Steady-State Model of Conflict. Rand Note (N-2889-PCT) (1989), RAND, Santa Monica, CA
35. Homer-Dixon T. Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int. Secur. 19 (1994) 5-40
36. Johst K., Drechsler M., and Wätzold F. An ecological-economic model procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures. Ecol. Econ. 41 (2002) 37-39
37. Jones S. Conflicts about natural resources. Footsteps 36 (1998) 1-3
38. Joshi A., Labianca G., and Cagliuri P. Getting along long distance: understanding conflict in a multinational team through network analysis. J. World Bus. 37 (2002) 277-284
39. Keltner J. From mild disagreement to war: the struggle spectrum. In: Stewart J. (Ed). Bridges, Not Walls (1990), McGraw-Hill, New York 319-332
40. Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998), Guilford Press, New York
41. Leach W., and Sabatier P. Facilitators, coordinators and outcomes. In: O'Leary R., and Bingham L.B. (Eds). The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution (2003), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 148-173
42. Lee N. Briding the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. 26 (2006) 57-78
43. Lélé S., and Norgaard R.B. Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 55 (2005) 967-975
44. López Hoffmann L., Monroe I.E., Narváez E., Martínez Ramos M., and Ackerly D.D. Sustainability of mangrove harvesting: how do harvesters' perceptions differ from ecological analysis?. Ecol. Soc. 11 (2006) 14
45. Marshall K., White R., and Fischer A. Conflicts between humans over wildlife management: on the diversity of stakeholder attitudes and implications for conflict management. Biodiver. Conserv. 16 (2007) 3129-3146
46. Max-Neef M.A. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol. Econ. 53 (2005) 5-16
47. Maxwell J.W., and Reuveny R. Continuing conflict. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 58 (2004) 30-52
48. Messner, F., Zwirner, O., Karkuschke, M., 2006, Participation in multi-criteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the Spree River basin. In: Rauschmayer, F., Wittmer, H. (Eds.), Resolving Environmental Conflicts: Combining Participation and Multi-Criteria Analysis. Land Use Policy 23, pp. 63-75.
49. Myšiak, J., Schwerdtner, K., Ring, I., 2004, Comparative analysis of the conflicts between carp pond farming and the protection of otters (Lutra lutra) in Upper Lusatia and South Bohemia. UFZ discussion Paper 8/2004. UFZ Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig: Germany.
50. Nepal S.K., and Weber K.E. Managing resources and resolving conflicts: national parks and local people. Int. J. Dev. World Ecol. 2 (1995) 11-25
51. In: O'Leary R., and Bingham L.B. (Eds). The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution (2003), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
52. Ortiz M., and Wolff M. Qualitative modelling for the Caete mangrove estuary (North Brazil): a preliminary approach to an integrated eco-social analysis. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci. 61 (2004) 243-250
53. Ostrom E. Institutional rational choice-an assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. In: Sabatier P.A. (Ed). Theories of the Policy Process (1999), Westview Press, Boulder 35-71
54. Özesmi U., and Özesmi S. A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat lake, Turkey. Environ. Manage. 31 (2004) 518-531
55. Patterson M.E., Montag J.M., and Williams D.R. The urbanization of wildlife management: social science, conflict, and decision making. Urban For. Urban Green. 1 (2003) 171-183
56. Peterson M.N., Peterson T.R., Peterson M.J., Lopez R.R., and Silvy N.J. Cultural conflict and the endangered Florida Key deer. J. Wildlife Manage. 66 (2002) 742-921
57. Putman R.B. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (1993), Princeton University Press, NJ, USA
58. Rauschmayer F., and Wittmer H. Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts. Land Use Policy 23 (2004) 108-122
59. Redpath S.M., and Thirgood S.J. Functional and numerical responses in generalist predators: hen harriers and peregrines on Scottish grouse moors. J. Anim. Ecol. 68 (1999) 879-892
60. Redpath S.M., Thirgood S.J., and Leckie F.M. Does supplementary feeding reduce predation of red grouse by hen harriers?. J. Appl. Ecol. 38 (2001) 1157-1168
61. Redpath S.M., Thirgood S.J., and Clarke R. Influence of field voles Microtus agrestis abundance on hen harrier Circus cyaneus diet and breeding in Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 144 (2002) E33-E39
62. Redpath S.M., Arroyo B., Leckie F.M., Bacon P., Bayfield N., Gutiérrez R.J., and Thirgood S.J. Using decision modelling with stakeholders to reduce human-wildlife conflict: a raptor-grouse case study. Conserv. Biol. 18 (2004) 350-359
63. Riley S.J., Siemer W.F., Decker D.J., Carpenter L.H., Organ J.F., and Berchielli L.T. Adaptive impact management: an integrated approach to wildlife management. Hum. Dimen. Wildlife 8 (2003) 81-95
64. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values (1973), Free Press, New York
65. Sandler T. Economic analysis of conflict. J. Conflict Resolut. 44 (2000) 723-729
66. Sanginga P.C., Kamugisha R.N., and Martin A.M. The dynamics of social capital and conflict management in multiple resource regimes: a case of the southwestern highlands of Uganda. Ecol. Soc. 12 (2007) 6
67. Steinberg S., and Bar-On D. An analysis of the group process in encounters between Jews and Palestinians using a typology for discourse classification. Int. J. Intercult. Rel. 26 (2002) 199-214
68. Stringer L.C., and Reed M.S. Land degradation assessment in southern Africa: Integrating local and scientific knowledge. Land Degrad. Dev. 18 (2007) 99-116
69. Thirgood S.J., Redpath S.M., Rothery P., and Aebischer N. Raptor predation and population limitation in red grouse. J. Anim. Ecol. 69 (2000) 504-516
70. Treves A., and Karanth K.U. Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003) 1491-1499
71. Vining J., Tyler E., and Kweon B.S. Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In: Gobster P.H., and Hull R.B. (Eds). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (2000), Island Press, Washington, DC 143-161
72. Warner, M., 2000, Conflict management in community-based natural resource projects: experiences from Fiji and Papua New Guinea, Working Paper 135. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
73. Watson M., and Thirgood S.J. Could translocation aid hen harrier conservation in the UK?. Anim. Conserv. 4 (2001) 37-43
74. Wätzold F., Drechsler M., Armstrong C.W., Baumgärtner S., Grimm V., Huth A., Perrings C., Possingham H.P., Shogren J.E., Skonhoft A., Verboom-Vasiljev J., and Wissel C. Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects. Conserv. Biol. 20 (2006) 1034-1041
75. In: Woodroffe R., Thirgood S., and Rabinowitz A. (Eds). People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? (2005), Cambridge University Press, Zoological Society of London