Endogenous Action Selection Processes in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Contribute to Sense of Agency: A Meta-Analysis of tDCS Studies of 'Intentional Binding'

Brain Stimulation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 372-379

  Khalighinejad, Nima ^a   Di Costa, Steven ^a   Haggard, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action selection; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Intentional binding; Meta analysis; Sense of agency; tDCS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; META ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; SENSE OF AGENCY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; BEHAVIOR; BIOPHYSICS; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84958213598     PISSN: 1935861X     EISSN: 18764754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. C.D. Frith Action, agency and responsibility Neuropsychologia 55 2014 137 142 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.007
2. S.M. Kranick, and M. Hallett Neurology of volition Exp Brain Res 229 2013 313 327 10.1007/s00221-013-3399-2
3. J.W. Moore, and P.C. Fletcher Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches Conscious Cogn 21 2012 59 68 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010
4. C. Farrer, and C.D. Frith Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency Neuroimage 15 2002 596 603 10.1006/nimg.2001.1009
5. C. Farrer, N. Franck, N. Georgieff, C.D. Frith, J. Decety, and M. Jeannerod Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study Neuroimage 18 2003 324 333 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00041-1
6. C. Farrer, S.H. Frey, J.D.V. Horn, E. Tunik, D. Turk, S. Inati, and et al. The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations Cereb Cortex 18 2008 254 261 10.1093/cercor/bhm050
7. M. Synofzik, G. Vosgerau, and A. Newen Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency Conscious Cogn 17 2008 219 239 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010
8. P. Haggard, S. Clark, and J. Kalogeras Voluntary action and conscious awareness Nat Neurosci 5 2002 382 385 10.1038/nn827
9. J.W. Moore, and S.S. Obhi Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review Conscious Cogn 21 2012 546 561 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002
10. A.M. Cravo, P.M.E. Claessens, and M.V.C. Baldo Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding Exp Brain Res 199 2009 95 99 10.1007/s00221-009-1969-0
11. M.A. Nitsche, and W. Paulus Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation J Physiol 527 Pt 3 2000 633 639 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
12. N. Khalighinejad, and P. Haggard Modulating human sense of agency with non-invasive brain stimulation Cortex 69 2015 93 103 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.015
13. M. Jahanshahi, I.H. Jenkins, R.G. Brown, C.D. Marsden, R.E. Passingham, and D.J. Brooks Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects Brain 118 Pt 4 1995 913 933 10.1093/brain/118.4.913
14. J.B. Rowe, L. Hughes, and I. Nimmo-Smith Action selection: a race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas Neuroimage 51 2010 888 896 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.045
15. S. Kühn, M. Brass, and P. Haggard Feeling in control: neural correlates of experience of agency Cortex 49 2013 1935 1942 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.002
16. J.W. Moore, D. Ruge, D. Wenke, J. Rothwell, and P. Haggard Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency Proc Biol Sci 277 2010 2503 2509 10.1098/rspb.2010.0404
17. J.B. Rowe, I. Toni, O. Josephs, R.S. Frackowiak, and R.E. Passingham The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science 288 2000 1656 1660 10.1126/science.288.5471.1656
18. I. Fried, R. Mukamel, and G. Kreiman Internally generated preactivation of single neurons in human medial frontal cortex predicts volition Neuron 69 2011 548 562 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.045
19. M.A. Nitsche, L.G. Cohen, E.M. Wassermann, A. Priori, Lang N., A. Antal, and et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008 Brain Stimul 1 2008 206 223 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
20. B. Zwissler, C. Sperber, S. Aigeldinger, S. Schindler, J. Kissler, and C. Plewnia Shaping memory accuracy by left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation J Neurosci 34 2014 4022 4026 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5407-13.2014
21. M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein Introduction to meta-analysis 2011 John Wiley & Sons
22. M.W. Lipsey, and D.B. Wilson Practical meta-analysis 2001 SAGE Publications
23. M. Gordon, and T. Lumley Forestplot: advanced forest plot using "grid" graphics R package version 1.3 2015
24. D. Lakens Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs Cognition 4 2013 863 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
25. J.P.T. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 2003 557 560 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
26. J.C. Horvath, J.D. Forte, and O. Carter Transcranial direct current stimulation demonstrates little-to-no reliable or significant effect on any cognitive/behavioral or neurophysiologic outcome measure: a comprehensive meta-analysis Brain Stimul 8 2015 318 319 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.034
27. J.C. Horvath, J.D. Forte, and O. Carter Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review Neuropsychologia 66C 2014 213 236 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021
28. L.V. Hedges, and J.L. Vevea Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis Psychol Methods 3 1998 486 504 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
29. J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green 9.5.2 Identifying and measuring heterogeneity n.d. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter-9/9-5-2-identifying-and-measuring-heterogeneity.htm accessed 10.08.15
30. V. Chambon, D. Wenke, S.M. Fleming, W. Prinz, and P. Haggard An online neural substrate for sense of agency Cereb Cortex 23 2013 1031 1037 10.1093/cercor/bhs059
31. I. Fried, A. Katz, G. McCarthy, K.J. Sass, P. Williamson, S.S. Spencer, and et al. Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation J Neurosci 11 1991 3656 3666
32. M. Desmurget, K.T. Reilly, N. Richard, A. Szathmari, C. Mottolese, and A. Sirigu Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans Science 324 2009 811 813 10.1126/science.1169896
33. V. Chambon, J.W. Moore, and P. Haggard TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency Brain Struct Funct 220 6 2015 3627 3639 10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6
34. A. Cavazzana, B. Penolazzi, C. Begliomini, and P.S. Bisiacchi Neural underpinnings of the "agent brain": new evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation Eur J Neurosci 2015 10.1111/ejn.12937
35. S. Tremblay, J.-F. Lepage, A. Latulipe-Loiselle, F. Fregni, A. Pascual-Leone, and H. Théoret The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS Brain Stimul 7 2014 773 783 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.003
36. L. Jacobson, M. Koslowsky, and M. Lavidor tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review Exp Brain Res 216 2012 1 10 10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9
37. T. Zaehle, P. Sandmann, J.D. Thorne, L. Jäncke, and C.S. Herrmann Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence BMC Neurosci 12 2011 2 10.1186/1471-2202-12-2
38. O. Meiron, and M. Lavidor Unilateral prefrontal direct current stimulation effects are modulated by working memory load and gender Brain Stimul 6 2013 440 447 10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.014
39. M.A. Nitsche, M. Bikson, and S. Bestmann On the use of meta-analysis in neuromodulatory non-invasive brain stimulation Brain Stimul 8 2015 666 667 10.1016/j.brs.2015.03.008
40. J.C. Horvath, J.D. Forte, and O. Carter Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Brain Stimul 8 2015 535 550 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400
41. T. Shallice From neuropsychology to mental structure 1988 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
42. J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green 9.6.4 Meta-regression n.d. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter-9/9-6-4-meta-regression.htm accessed 02.01.16
43. Z. Barlas, and S.S. Obhi Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency Front Hum Neurosci 7 2013 514 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00514
44. D.M. Wegner The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will Trends Cogn Sci 7 2003 65 69
45. D. Meron, N. Hedger, M. Garner, and D.S. Baldwin Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability Neurosci Biobehav Rev 57 2015 46 62 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.07.012