Getting the incentives right. Energy performance contracts as a tool for property management by local government

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 112, Issue , 2016, Pages 2717-2729

  Hufen, Hans ^a   De Bruijn, Hans ^b  

^a Leiden Science Park Leiden   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Energy conservation; Incentives in networks; Network management; Performance contracts; Policy instruments

Indexed keywords

CONTRACTS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HISTORIC PRESERVATION; NETWORK MANAGEMENT;

BUILDING SECTORS; ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS; IN NETWORKS; INCENTIVE STRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS; PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; PROPERTY MANAGEMENT;

INNOVATION;

EID: 84958123317     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.036     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Al-Saleh, Y., Mahroum, S., 2014. A critical review of the interplay between policy instruments and business models: greening the built environment a case in point. J. Clean. Prod. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.42.
2. Bouckaert, Geert, 1993. Measurement and meaningful management. Public Prod. Manag. Rev. 1, 31-43.
3. Bouckaert, Geert, Peters, B.G., 2002. Performance measurement and management: the Achilles' heel in administrative modernization. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 4, 359-362.
4. Bouckaert, Geert, Halligan, J., 2007. Managing Performance: International Comparisons. Routledge, London.
5. Bruijn, Hans de, 2007. Managing Performance in the Public Sector. Routledge, London.
6. Bratt, C., Hallstedt, S., Robert, K.-H., Bröman, G., Oldmark, J., 2013. Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 52, 309-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jclepro.2013.02.007.
7. Bueren, E.M. van, 2009. Greening Governance. IOS Press.
8. 2 savings potential in a difficult market?). Build Desk report nr. 1102, Delft.
9. Buildings Performance Institute Europe, 2011. Europe's Buildings under the Microscope: a Country-by-country Review of the Energy Performance of Buildings. BPIE, Brussels.
10. Buildings Performance Institute Europe, 2012. Energy Efficiency Policies in Buildings: the Use of Financial Instruments at Member State Level. BPIE, Brussels.
11. Busse, R., Geissler, A., Aaviksoo, A., Cots, F., Häkkinen, U., Kobel, C., Mateus, C., Or, Z., O'Reilly, J., Serdén, L., 2013. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ Br. Med. J. 346.
12. Cobouw, 2013. Zwembaden verbruiken 30 procent minder energie dankzij mini-PPS [Swimming Facilities Use 30% Less Energy, Thanks to Mini PPP]. Cobouw, February 21, 2013.
13. Doelen, F.C.J. van der, 1989. Beleidsinstrumenten en energiebesparing [Policy instruments and energy conservation]. University of Twente, Enschede.
14. Economisch Instituut voor de Bouwnijverheid, 2005. Opdrachtgevers aan het woord [Commissioning Parties Speak]. EIB, Amsterdam.
15. Eindrapport Parlementaire Enquêtecommissie Bouwnijverheid, 2002. [Final Report of the Parliamentary Inquiry Commission on Construction], Handelingen Tweede Kamer 28.244, nr.6, Session Year 2002-2003. Staatsuitgeverij, The Hague.
16. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), 2009. Energy Efficiency Services, Market Development Energy and Energy Service Companies. ECN, Petten.
17. Eurostat Newsrelease, 2014. Renewable Energy in the EU28 (37/2014). Available via Eurostat Press Office. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/5181358/8-10032014-AP-EN.PDF/91350d4a-4b57-4833-b9f0-32cfe0a6d360?version=1.0. Accessed: August 2015.
18. Faith-Ell, C., Balfors, B., Folkeson, L., 2006. The application of environmental requirements in Swedish road maintenance contracts. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 163-171.
19. GR1, Gemeente Rotterdam (Municipality of Rotterdam, 2011), Aanbestedingsprocedure van de gemeente Rotterdam [Tendering procedure of the municipality of Rotterdam], 2012 (accessed 16.07.15.) http://www.rotterdam.nl/Clusters/Stadsontwikkeling/Document%202013/vastgoed/groene%20gebouwen/Procesbeschrijving%20aanbestedingsprocedure%20Rotterdamse%20Groene%20gebouwen%20120419.pdf
20. GR2, Gemeente Rotterdam (Municipality of Rotterdam, 2011), Aanbestedingsdocumenten van de gemeente Rotterdam [Tendering documents of the municipality of Rotterdam], 2012 (accessed 16.07.15.) http://www.rotterdam.nl/aanbestedingsdocumenten
21. GR3, Gemeente Rotterdam (Municipality of Rotterdam, 2011), Procesbeschrijving aanbestedingsprocedure, formule Rotterdamse zwembaden [Process description of the tendering procedure: The Rotterdam swimming facility formula], 2012 Rotterdam. (accessed 16.07.15.) http://www.rotterdam.nl/Clusters/Stadsontwikkeling/Document%202013/vastgoed/groene%20gebouwen/Procesbeschrijving%20aanbestedingsprocedure%20Rotterdamse%20Groene%20gebouwen%20120419.pdf
22. Haas, Marco de, Kleingeld, A., 1999. Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Manag. Account. Res. (3), 233-261.
23. Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Stimac, V., 2013. Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey. Public Money Manag. (4), 261-268.
24. Heijden, J. van der, 2015. Regulatory failures, split incentives, conflicting interests and a vicious circle of blame: the new environmental governance to the rescue? J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 58 (6), 1034-1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.907135.
25. 2 reductie in de bestaande woningbouw [CO2-reduction in nonresidential buildings]. University of Twente.
26. Hufen, J.A.M., 2013. Werkt Energiebesparing via Aanbesteding? [Does energy conservation work through tendering?]. Tijdschrift Milieu J. Environ. 6, 33-37.
27. Johnsen, Å., 2005. What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management? Public Money Manag. (1), 9-17.
28. Kelman, S., Friedman, J.N., 2009. Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: an empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory (4), 917-946.
29. Kerpershoek, E., 2015. Medical Professionals' Responses to a DRG Performance Management System for Hospital Care in the Netherlands. Delft University of Technology, Delft.
30. Krozer, Y., 2014. Smart grid and EU 27 countries policy. In: Paper Presented at the ESEAI Conference at the University of Twente, Enschede, 24-25 April 2014.
31. Ministry of Finance, 2012. Rijksbrede modelovereenkomst DBFM(O) [Government-wide Model Agreement Design Build Finance Maintenance (Operate)]. Staatsuitgeverij, The Hague.
32. MNC, 2010. Milieu- en natuurcompendium [Environment and nature compendium]. http://www.milieuennatuurcompendium.nl. Accessed: August 2015.
33. Moynihan, D.P., Pandey, S.K., Wright, B.E., 2012. Prosocial values and performance management theory: linking perceived social impact and performance information use. Governance 25 (3), 463-483.
34. Osborne, D., Gaebler, T., 1992. Reinventing Government. Penguin, Reading.
35. Pollitt, C., 2013. The logics of performance management. Evaluation (4), 346-363.
36. Regieraad Bouw, 2005. Vernieuwingsoffensief Bouw, Werkprogramma 2005-2008 van de Regieraad Bouw [Innovation offensive in construction: 2005-2008 Working programme of the Regulatory Council for Construction]. Regieraad Bouw, Gouda.
37. 2 performance ladder on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 33-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.027.
38. 2 performance ladder: does it lead to ambitious goals for carbon dioxide emission reduction? J. Clean. Prod. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.j.lepro.2014.09.046.
39. Rizzi, F., Frey, M., Testa, F., Appolloni, A., 2014. Environmental value chain in green SME-networks: the threat of the Abilene paradox. J. Clean. Prod. 85, 265-275.
40. Schoenmaker, Rob, 2011. De ingeslagen weg [The Chosen Way]. Delft University of Technology (in Dutch), Delft.
41. SER, 2013. Energieakkoord voor duurzame groei [Energy Agreement for Sustainable Growth]. Sociaal Economische Raad, Den Haag.
42. Slack, N., Johnston, R., 2010. Operations Management. Pearson Education, Harlow.
43. Smith, P., 1995. On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. Int. J. Public Adm. (2-3), 277-310.
44. Taskforce Energietransitie, 2006. Meer met Energie [More with Energy]. http://www.gezen.nl/archief/Meer-met-Energie-tcm24-187512-2.pdf. Accessed: September 2015.
45. Teelken, C., 2008. The intricate implementation of performance measurement systems: exploring developments in professional-service organizations in the Dutch non-profit sector. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. (4), 615-635.
46. Turner, J. Rodney, 2004. Farsighted project contract management: incomplete in its entirety. Constr. Manag. Econ. 22 (1), 75-83.
47. UNU-Merit, 2012. Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011, Rotterdam. http://dx.doi.org/10.2769/32530.
48. Uttam, K., Le Lann Roos, C., 2015. Competitive dialogue procedure for sustainable public procurement. J. Clean. Prod. 86, 403-416.
49. Vakkuri, J., 2010. Struggling with ambiguity: public managers as users of NPM-oriented management instruments. Public Adm. 999-1024.
50. Vollebergh, H., 2014. Green tax Reform: Energy Tax Challenges for the Netherlands. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
51. Walker, Richard M., Boyne, George A., Brewe, Gene A., 2010. Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.