Trust Evolvement in Hybrid Team Collaboration: A Longitudinal Case Study

Group Decision and Negotiation

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 267-288

  Cheng, Xusen ^a   Yin, Guopeng ^a   Azadegan, Aida ^b   Kolfschoten, Gwendolyn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS   (China)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Teamwork; Trust; Trust development; Trust evaluation; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958107732     PISSN: 09262644     EISSN: 15729907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-015-9442-x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abdul-Rahman A, Hailes S (2000) Supporting trust in virtual communities. In: Proceedings of the 33th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii, USA. IEEE Press, pp 4–7
2. Azadegan A, Kolfschoten GL (2014) An assessment framework for practicing facilitator. Group Decis Negotiat 23(5):1013–1045
3. Beise CM, Niederman F, Mattord H (2004) IT project managers’ perceptions and use of virtual team technologies. Inf Resour Manag J 17(4):73–88
4. Bente G, Rüggenberg S, Krämer NC (2004) Social presence and interpersonal trust in avatar-based, collaborative net-communications. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual international workshop on presence. Valencia, Spain, pp 54–61
5. Bøjrn P, Ngwenyama O (2009) Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Inf Syst J 19(3):227–253
6. Boss RW (1978) Trust and managerial problem solving revisited. Group Organ Stud 3(3):331–342
7. Briggs RO, Kolfschoten GL, de Vreede GJ, Dean DL (2006) Defining key concepts for collaboration engineering. In: Proceedings of the 12th Americas conference on information systems AIS Electronic Library. Acapulco, Mexico, pp 121–128
8. Briggs RO, de Vreede GJ (2001) ThinkLets, building blocks for concerted collaboration. Delft University of Technology, Delft
9. Briggs RO, de Vreede GJ, Nunamaker JF (2003) Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):31–63
10. Butler JK, Cantrell RS (1984) A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superior and subordinates. Psychol Rep 55(1):19–28
11. Cascio WF (2000) Managing a virtual workplace. Acad Manag Exec 14(3):81–90
12. Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (1998) Principles of trust for multi-agent systems: cognitive anatomy, social importance and quantification. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on multi-agent systems. France, Paris, pp 72–79
13. Cheng X, Macaulay L, Zarifis A (2013a) Modeling individual trust in computer mediated teams: a comparison of approaches. Comput Hum Behav 29(4):1733–1741
14. Cheng X, Macaulay L (2014) Exploring individual trust factors in computer mediated group collaboration: a case study approach. Group Decis Negot 23(3):533–560
15. Cheng X, Nolan T, Macaulay L (2013b) Don’t give up the community—a viewpoint of trust development in online collaboration. Inf Technol People 26(3):298–318
16. Coetzee M, Eloff JHP (2005) Autonomous trust for web services. J Internet Res 15(5):498–507
17. Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Cummings LL, Bromily P (1996) The organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation. In: Kramer R, Tyler T (eds) Trust in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 302–330
19. Dafoulas G, Macaulay LA (2002) Investigating cultural differences in virtual software teams. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Count 7(4):1–14
20. Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance. MIS Q 11(3):335–368
21. Deutsch M (1958) Trust and suspicion. J Confl Resolut 2(4):265–279
22. Dimitrako T (2003) A service-oriented trust management framework. In: Trust reputation, and security: theories and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–72
23. Erikson EH (1963) Childhood and society, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton, New York, NY
24. Fairholm MR, Fairholm G (2000) Leadership amid the constraints of trust. Leadersh Organ Dev J 21(2): 102–109
25. Fiol CM, O’Connor EJ (2005) Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: untangling the contradictions. Organ Sci 16(1):19–32
26. Friedman B, Kahn P, Howe D (2000) Trust online. Commun ACM 43(12):34–40
27. Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 7(4):1–70
28. Greenberg PS, Greenberg RH, Antonucci YL (2007) Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams. Bus Horiz 50(4):325–333
29. Griffith T, Sawyer J, Neale M (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Q 27(2):265–287
30. Hosmer LT (1995) Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):379–403
31. Hoy WK, Tschannen-Moran M (1999) Five faces of trust: an empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. J Sch Leadersh 9(3):184–208
32. Hoy WK, Tschannen-Moran M (2003) The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. In: Studies in leading and organising schools. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT
33. Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE (1998) Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J Manag Inf Syst 14(4):29–64
34. Kee HW, Knox RE (1970) Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. J Confl Resolut 14(3):357–366
35. Kirkman BL, Rosen B, Tesluk PE, Gibson CB (2004) The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad Manag J 47(2):175–192
36. Kolb DG, Collins PD, Lind EA (2008) Requisite connectivity: finding flow in a not-so-flat world. Organ Dyn 37(2):181–189
37. Kolfschoten GL, Brazier FM (2013) Cognitive load in collaboration: convergence. Group Decis Negot 22(5):975–996
38. Kolfschoten GL, Briggs RO, De Vreede GJ, Jacobs PH, Appelman JH (2006) A conceptual foundation of the thinkLet concept for collaboration engineering. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(7):611–621
39. Kramer RM (1996) Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: trust and the intuitive auditor at work. In: Trust in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
40. Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB (1996) Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 114–139
41. Lewis JD, Weigert AJ (1985) Trust as a social reality. Soc Forces 63(4):967–985
42. Luhmann N (1988) Wie ist bewußtsein an kommunikation beteiligt. Materialität der Kommunikation, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp
43. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709–734
44. McKnight DH, Chervany NL (1996) The meanings of trust. Technical Report MISRC 96-04, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, MN
45. Mishra AK (1996) Organization responses to crisis: the centrality of trust. In: Kramer R, Tyler T (eds) Trust in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 261–287
46. Nolan T, Brizland R, Macaulay L (2007) Individual trust and development of online business communities. Inf Technol People 20(1):53–71
47. Pinjani P, Palvia P (2013) Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Inf Manag 50(4):144–153
48. Powell A, Galvin J, Piccoli G (2006) Antecedents to team member commitment from near and far: a comparison between collocated and virtual teams. Inf Technol People 19(4):299–322
49. Reid LC (2008) Faculty trust and its impact on voluntary teacher turnover intentions. College of William and Mary, Ann Arbor
50. Rose J, Schlichter BR (2013) Decoupling, re-engaging: managing trust relationships in implementation projects. Inf Syst J 23(1):5–33
51. Rotter JB (1967) A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J Personal Soc Psychol 35(4):651–665
52. Rotter JB (1980) Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. Am Psychol 35(1):1–7
53. Rousseau DM, Sitkin SM, Burr RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manag Rev 23(3):393–404
54. Sarker S, Ahuja M, Sarker S, Kirkeby S (2011) The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: a social network perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 28(1):273–310
55. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1998) Information rules—a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
56. Sharkie R (2005) Precariousness under the new psychological contract: the effect on trust and the willingness to converse and share knowledge. Knowl Manag Res Pract 3(1):37–44
57. Straub D, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13(24):380–427
58. Tan YH, Thoen W (2003) Electronic contract drafting based on risk and trust assessment. Int J Electron Commer 7(4):55–71
59. Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy WK (2000) A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. J Educ Res 70(4):547–593
60. Tschannen-Moran M (2004) Trustworthy leadership: the heart of productive schools. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
61. Von Krogh G, Kazuo I, Nonaka I (2000) Enabling knowledge creation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
62. Wang YD, Emurian HH (2005) An overview of online trust: concepts, elements and implications. Comput Hum Behav 21(1):105–125
63. Webber R (2002) Editor’s comments. MIS Q 26(1):3–8
64. Williamson OE (1993) Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J Law Econ 36(1):453–486
65. Wilson JM, Straus SG, McEvily B (2006) All in due time: the development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 99(1):16–33
66. Yusof SAM, Zakaria N (2012) Exploring the state of discipline on the formation of swift trust within global virtual teams. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Maui, Hawaii. IEEE Press, pp 475–482