Sonoprinting and the importance of microbubble loading for the ultrasound mediated cellular delivery of nanoparticles

Biomaterials

Volumn 83, Issue , 2016, Pages 294-307

  De Cock, Ine ^a   Lajoinie, Guillaume ^b   Versluis, Michel ^b   De Smedt, Stefaan C ^a   Lentacker, Ine ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Drug delivery; Loaded microbubbles; Mechanisms; Microbubbles; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CELLS; DRUG DELIVERY; MECHANISMS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSPHERES; ULTRASONICS;

CELLULAR DELIVERY; LARGE AMOUNTS; MEMBRANE PORES; MICRO-BUBBLE; MICROBUBBLES; POLYSTYRENE NANOSPHERES; SWEPT-FIELD CONFOCAL MICROSCOPIES; ULTRASOUND RADIATION;

CYTOLOGY;

CANCER VACCINE; DENDRIMER; LIPOSOME; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; NANOPARTICLE; LIPID; MESSENGER RNA; NANOSPHERE; POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY; CHEMOIMMUNOTHERAPY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG TARGETING; NANOENCAPSULATION; NANOMEDICINE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; CHEMISTRY; ENDOCYTOSIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROBUBBLE; PROCEDURES; TUMOR CELL LINE; ULTRASOUND;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; ENDOCYTOSIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; LIPIDS; MICROBUBBLES; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSPHERES; POLYSTYRENES; RNA, MESSENGER; SONICATION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84958078210     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Kooiman K., Vos H.J., Versluis M., de Jong N. Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72:28-48.
2. Lentacker I., De Cock I., Deckers R., De Smedt S.C., Moonen C.T.W. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72:49-64.
3. Mehier-Humbert S., Bettinger T., Yan F., Guy R.H. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2005, 104(1):213-222.
4. Meijering B.D., Juffermans L.J., van Wamel A., Henning R.H., Zuhorn I.S., Emmer M., Versteilen A.M., Paulus W.J., van Gilst W.H., Kooiman K., de Jong N., Muster R.J., Deelman L.E., Kamp O. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ. Res. 2009, 104(5):679-687.
5. De Cock I., Zagato E., Braeckmans K., Luan Y., de Jong N., De Smedt S.C., Lentacker I. Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis. J. Control. Release 2015, 197:20-28.
6. van Wamel A., Kooiman K., Harteveld M., Emmer M., ten Cate F.J., Versluis M., de Jong N. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J. Control. Release 2006, 112(2):149-155.
7. Schlicher R.K., Radhakrishna H., Tolentino T.P., Apkarian R.P., Zarnitsyn V., Prausnitz M.R. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32(6):915-924.
8. Lentacker I., De Smedt S.C., Sanders N.N. Drug loaded microbubble design for ultrasound triggered delivery. Soft Matter. 2009, 5:2161-2170.
9. Unger E.C., McCreery T.P., Sweitzer R.H., Caldwell V.E., Wu Y. Acoustically active lipospheres containing paclitaxel: a new therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent. Invest. Radiol. 1998, 33(12):886-892.
10. Zhao Y.Z., Liang H.D., Mei X.G., Halliwell M. Preparation, characterization and in vivo observation of phospholipid-based gas-filled microbubbles containing hirudin. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005, 31(9):1237-1243.
11. Christiansen J.P., French B.A., Klibanov A.L., Kaul S., Lindner J.R. Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2003, 29(12):1759-1767.
12. Kheirolomoom A., Dayton P.A., Lum A.F., Little E., Paoli E.E., Zheng H., Ferrara K.W. Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. J. Control. Release 2007, 118(3):275-284.
13. Geers B., Lentacker I., Cool S., Demeester J., De Smedt S.C., Sanders N.N. Ultrasound responsive doxorubicin-loaded microbubbles; towards an easy applicable drug delivery platform. J. Control. Release 2010, 148(1):59-60.
14. Lentacker I., De Smedt S.C., Demeester J., Van Marck V., Bracke M., Sanders N.N. Lipoplex-loaded microbubbles for gene delivery: a trojan horse controlled by ultrasound. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17(12):1910-1916.
15. Lentacker I., Geers B., Demeester J., De Smedt S.C., Sanders N.N. Design and evaluation of doxorubicin-containing microbubbles for ultrasound-triggered doxorubicin delivery: cytotoxicity and mechanisms involved. Mol. Ther. 2010, 18(1):101-108.
16. Sirsi S.R., Borden M.A. State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72:3-14.
17. Rychak J.J., Klibanov A.L. Nucleic acid delivery with microbubbles and ultrasound. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72:82-93.
18. Lentacker I., De Geest B.G., Vandenbroucke R.E., Peeters L., Demeester J., De Smedt S.C., Sanders N.N. Ultrasound-responsive polymer-coated microbubbles that bind and protect DNA. Langmuir 2006, 22(17):7273-7278.
19. Kiessling F., Fokong S., Koczera P., Lederle W., Lammers T. Ultrasound microbubbles for molecular diagnosis, therapy, and theranostics. J. Nucl. Med. 2012, 53(3):345-348.
20. Dewitte H., Vanderperren K., Haers H., Stock E., Duchateau L., Hesta M., Saunders J.H., De Smedt S.C., Lentacker I. Theranostic mRNA-loaded microbubbles in the lymphatics of dogs: implications for drug delivery. Theranostics 2015, 5(1):97-109.
21. Eisenbrey J.R., Soulen M.C., Wheatley M.A. Delivery of encapsulated Doxorubicin by ultrasound-mediated size reduction of drug-loaded polymer contrast agents. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57(1):24-28.
22. Luan Y., Lajoinie G., Gelderblom E., Skachkov I., van der Steen A.F., Vos H.J., Versluis M., De Jong N. Lipid shedding from single oscillating microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2014, 4(8):1834-1846.
23. Luan Y., Lajoinie G., Gelderblom E., Skachkov I., Dewitte H., Lentacker I., van Rooij T., Vos H., van der Steen T., Versluis M., de Jong N. Liposome shedding from a vibrating microbubble on nanoseconds timescale. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings 2013, Czech Republic (Prague) IUS1-B1-2.
24. Borden M.A., Kruse D.E., Caskey C.F., Zhao S., Dayton P.A., Ferrara K.W. Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2005, 52(11):1992-2002.
25. De Temmerman M.L., Dewitte H., Vandenbroucke R.E., Lucas B., Libert C., Demeester J., De Smedt S.C., Lentacker I., Rejman J. mRNA-lipoplex loaded microbubble contrast agents for ultrasound-assisted transfection of dendritic cells. Biomaterials 2011, 32(34):9128-9135.
26. Quax P.H., van Muijen G.N., Weening-Verhoeff E.J., Lund L.R., Danø K., Ruiter D.J., Verheijen J.H. Metastatic behavior of human melanoma cell lines in nude mice correlates with urokinase-type plasminogen activator, its type-inhibitor, and urokinase-mediated matrix degradation. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 115(1):191-199.
27. Weigel P.H., Oka J.A. Temperature dependence of endocytosis mediated by the asialoglycoprotein receptor in isolated rat hepatocytes. Evidence for two potentially rate-limiting steps. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256(6):2615-2617.
28. Lakowicz J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy 2006, Springer Science + Business Media, New York, USA. third ed.
29. Vranic S., Boggetto N., Contremoulins V., Mornet S., Reinhardt N., Marano F., Baeza-Squiban A., Boland S. Deciphering the mechanisms of cellular uptake of engineered nanoparticles by accurate evaluation of internalization using imaging flow cytometry. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2013, 10:2.
30. Hu Y., Wan J.M., Yu A.C. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013, 39(12):2393-2405.
31. Hernot S., Klibanov A.L. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60(10):1153-1166.
32. Lum A.F., Borden M.A., Dayton P.A., Kruse D.E., Simon S.I., Ferrara K.W. Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. J. Control. Release 2006, 111(1-2):128-134.
33. Ibsen S., Shi G., Schutt C., Shi L., Suico K.D., Benchimol M., Serra V., Simberg D., Berns M., Esener S. The behavior of lipid debris left on cell surfaces from microbubble based ultrasound molecular imaging. Ultrasonics 2014, 54(8):2090-2098.
34. Couture O., Faivre M., Pannacci N., Babataheri A., Servois V., Tabeling P., Tanter M. Ultrasound internal tattooing. Med. Phys. 2011, 38(2):1116-1123.
35. Lentacker I., Wang N., Vandenbroucke R.E., Demeester J., De Smedt S.C., Sanders N.N. Ultrasound exposure of lipoplex loaded microbubbles facilitates direct cytoplasmic entry of lipoplexes. Mol. Pharm. 2009, 6(2):457-467.
36. Marmottant P., Versluis M., de Jong N., Hilgenfeldt S., Lohse D. High-speed imaging of an ultrasound-driven bubble in contact with a wall: "Narcissus" effect and resolved acoustic streaming. Exp. Fluids 2005, 41(2):147-153.
37. Collis J., Manasseh R., Liovic P., Tho P., Ooi A., Petkovic-Duran K., Zhu Y. Cavitation microstreaming and stress fields created by microbubbles. Ultrasonics 2010, 50(2):273-279.
38. Schutt C.E., Ibsen S.D., Thrift W., Esener S.C. The influence of distance between microbubbles on the fluid flow produced during ultrasound exposure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2014, 136(6):3422.
39. Dayton P.A., Allen J.S., Ferrara K.W. The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 112(Pt 1):2183-2192.
40. Geers B., Lentacker I., Alonso A., Sanders N.N., Demeester J., Meairs S., De Smedt S.C. Elucidating the mechanisms behind sonoporation with adeno-associated virus-loaded microbubbles. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8(6):2244-2251.
41. Partlow K.C., Lanza G.M., Wickline S.A. Exploiting lipid raft transport with membrane targeted nanoparticles: a strategy for cytosolic drug delivery. Biomaterials 2008, 29(23):3367-3375.
42. Lu J.J., Langer R., Chen J. A novel mechanism is involved in cationic lipid-mediated functional siRNA delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2009, 6(3):763-771.
43. Crowder K.C., Hughes M.S., Marsh J.N., Barbieri A.M., Fuhrhop R.W., Lanza G.M., Wickline S.A. Sonic activation of molecularly-targeted nanoparticles accelerates transmembrane lipid delivery to cancer cells through contact-mediated mechanisms: implications for enhanced local drug delivery. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005, 31(12):1693-1700.
44. Luan Y., Faez T., Gelderblom E., Skachkov I., Geers B., Lentacker I., van der Steen T., Versluis M., de Jong N. Acoustical properties of individual liposome-loaded microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012, 38(12):2174-2185.
45. Chen H., Brayman A.A., Kreider W., Bailey M.R., Matula T.J. Observations of translation and jetting of ultrasound-activated microbubbles in mesenteric microvessels. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2011, 37(12):2139-2148.
46. Dayton P., Klibanov A., Brandenburger G., Ferrara K. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1999, 25(8):1195-1201.
47. Chen H., Kreider W., Brayman A.A., Bailey M.R., Matula T.J. Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106(3):34301.
48. Prentice P., Cuschieri A., Dholakia K., Prausnitz M., Campbell P. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nat. Phys. 2005, 1:107-110.
49. Unger E., Porter T., Lindner J., Grayburn P. Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72:110-126.
50. Mayer C.R., Bekeredjian R. Ultrasonic gene and drug delivery to the cardiovascular system. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60(10):1177-1192.
51. Dewitte H., Van Lint S., Heirman C., Thielemans K., De Smedt S.C., Breckpot K., Lentacker I. The potential of antigen and TriMix sonoporation using mRNA-loaded microbubbles for ultrasound-triggered cancer immunotherapy. J. Control. Release 2014, 194:28-36.