Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making - An introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

Value in Health

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-13

  Thokala, Praveen ^a   Devlin, Nancy ^b   Marsh, Kevin ^c   Baltussen, Rob ^d   Boysen, Meindert ^e   Kalo, Zoltan ^f,g   Longrenn, Thomas ^h,o   Mussen, Filip ⁱ   Peacock, Stuart ^j,k   Watkins, John ^l,m   Ijzerman, Maarten ⁿ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b Office of Health Economics   (United Kingdom)

^c EVIDERA   (United Kingdom)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^f EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^g Syreon Research Institute   (Hungary)

^h NDA Group AB   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

^j BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^k SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^l Premera Blue Cross   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^o NDA Group AB   (Sweden)

more..

Author keywords

decision making; health care; MCDA; multiple criteria decision analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; THAILAND; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WORKSHOP; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84957849969     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. R. Baltussen, and L. Niessen Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis Cost Eff Resour Alloc 4 2006 14
2. N. Daniels, and J.E. Sabin Accountability for reasonableness: an update BMJ 2008 337
3. Kaksalan M, Wallenius J, Zionts S. Multiple Criteria Decision Making From Early History to the 21st Century. World Scientific Publishing Limited, Singapore, 2011
4. N. Devlin, and J. Sussex Incorporating Multiple Criteria in HTA: Methods and Processes 2011 Office of Health Economics London
5. Multicriteria Analysis: A Manual 2009 Department for Communities and Local Government London
6. Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, et al. Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2012
7. V. Diaby, K. Campbell, and R. Goeree Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a bibliometric analysis Oper Res Health Care 2 2013 20 24
8. K. Marsh, T. Lanitis, D. Neasham, and et al. Assessing the value of health care interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature Pharmacoeconomics 32 2014 345 365
9. P.M. Mullen Quantifying priorities in healthcare: transparency or illusion? Health Serv Manage Res 17 2004 47 58
10. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
11. Belton V, Stewart TJ. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, 2002.
12. European Medicines Agency. Benefit-risk methodology project. Update on work package 5: effects table pilot (phase I). 2015. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en-GB/document-library/Report/2014/02/WC500162036.pdf. [Access date December 2015].
13. D. Aletaha, T. Neogi, A.J. Silman, and et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative Arthritis Rheum 62 2010 2569 2581
14. S.R. Johnson, R.P. Naden, J. Fransen, and et al. Multicriteria decision analysis methods with 1000Minds for developing systemic sclerosis classification criteria J Clin Epidemiol 67 2014 706 714
15. J.G. Dolan Medical decision making using the analytic hierarchy process: choice of initial antimicrobial therapy for acute pyelonephritis Med Decis Making 9 1989 51 56
16. J.G. Dolan Shared decision-making - transferring research into practice: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Patient Educ Couns 73 2008 418 425
17. J.A. van Til, G.J. Renzenbrink, J.G. Dolan, and M.J. Ijzerman The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 2008 457 462
18. L.D. Phillips, B. Fasolo, N. Zafiropoulos, and A. Beyer Is quantitative benefit-risk modelling of drugs desirable or possible? Drug Discovery Today Technol 8 2011 e3 10
19. European Medicines Agency. Benefit-risk methodology project. Work package 3 report: field tests. 2015. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en-GB/document-library/Report/2011/09/WC500112088.pdf. [Accessed December 28, 2015].
20. European Medicines Agency. Benefit-risk methodology project. Work package 4 report: benefit-risk tools and processes. 2015. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en-GB/document-library/Report/2012/03/WC500123819.pdf. [Accessed December 28, 2015].
21. M. Danner, J.M. Hummel, F. Volz, and et al. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27 2011 369 375
22. S. Youngkong, R. Baltussen, S. Tantivess, and et al. Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit package in Thailand Value Health 15 2012 961 970
23. G. Radaelli, E. Lettieri, C. Masella, and et al. Implementation of EUnetHTA core model® in Lombardia: the VTS framework Int J Technol Assess Health Care 30 2014 105 112
24. 3rd Plenary session, ISPOR 16th Annual European Congress, 2-6 November 2013, Dublin, Ireland. Available from: http://www.ispor.org/congresses/Dublin1113/presentations/Third-Plenary-Karl-Claxton-Slides.pdf. [Accessed December 28, 2015].
25. K. Claxton Three questions to ask when examining MCDA Value Outcomes Spotlight 1 2015 18 20
26. L.D. Phillips Bana e Costa CA. Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing Ann Oper Res 154 2007 51 68
27. M. Airoldi, A. Morton, J.A. Smith, and G. Bevan STAR - people-powered prioritization: a 21st-century solution to allocation headaches Med Decis Making 34 2014 965 975
28. C.R. Mitton, C. Donaldson, H. Waldner, and C. Eagle The evolution of PBMA: towards a macro-level priority setting framework for health regions Health Care Manag Sci 6 2003 263 269
29. C.R. Mitton, and C. Donaldson Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) Health Policy 64 2003 335 348
30. S.J. Peacock, J.R. Richardson, R. Carter, and D. Edwards Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) Soc Sci Med 64 2007 897 910
31. K. Marsh, P. Dolan, J. Kempster, and M. Lugon Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis J Public Health (Oxf) 35 2013 460 466
32. S. Youngkong, Y. Teerawattananon, S. Tantivess, and R. Baltussen Multi-criteria decision analysis for setting priorities on HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand Health Res Policy Syst 10 2012 6
33. M.M. Goetghebeur, M. Wagner, H. Khoury, and et al. Evidence and value: impact on DEcisionMaking - the EVIDEM framework and potential applications BMC Health Serv Res 8 2008 270
34. M.M. Goetghebeur, M. Wagner, H. Khoury, and et al. Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients Cost Eff Resour Alloc 8 2010 4
35. J.G. Dolan, E. Boohaker, J. Allison, and T.F. Imperiale Patients' preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening Med Decis Making 33 2013 59 70
36. P. Hansen, A. Hendry, R. Naden, and et al. A new process for creating points systems for prioritising patients for elective health services Clin Govern Int J 17 2012 200 209
37. P.S. Kamath, and W. Kim The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) Hepatology 45 2007 797 805
38. IQWiG (Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) - pilot project to elicit patient preferences in the indication "depression". 2015. Available from: https://www.iqwig.de/download/Executive-summary-of-working-paper-Analytic-Hierarchy-Process-pilot-project.pdf. [Accessed: December 28, 2015].
39. IQWiG (Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care). Choice-based conjoint analysis - pilot project to identify, weight, and prioritize multiple attributes in the indication "hepatitis C". 2015. Available from: https://www.iqwig.de/download/GA10-03-Executive-summary-of-working-paper-1.1-Conjoint-Analysis.pdf. [Accessed: December 28, 2015].
40. Adunlin G, Diaby V, Xiao H. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis [published online ahead of print October 18, 2014]. Health Expect. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12287.
41. P. Thokala, and A. Duenas Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment Value Health 15 2012 1172 1181
42. B. Roy The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods Theory Decision 31 1991 49 73
43. Electre methods J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrogott, and J. Rui Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys 78th ed. 2005 Springer New York
44. B. Roy, and D. Vanderpooten The European school of MCDA: emergence, basic features and current works J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 5 1996 22 38
45. J.P. Brans, and P. Vincke A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making) Manag Sci 31 1985 647 656
46. J.P. Brans, and B. Mareschal The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid Dec Support Syst 12 1994 297 310
47. B. Aouni, and O. Kettani Goal programming model: a glorious history and a promising future Eur J Oper Res 133 2001 225 231
48. McGinley P. Decision analysis software survey. OR/MS Today 2012;39. Available from: http://www.orms-today.org/surveys/das/das.html [Accessed December 28, 2015].
49. Weistroffer HR, Li Y. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis software. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2nd ed.). Springer, USA, 2014.
50. D. von Winterfeldt, and B. Fasolo Structuring decision problems: a case study and reflections for practitioners Eur J Oper Res 199 2009 857 866
51. von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.
52. Watson SR. Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.
53. P.A. Bottomley, J.R. Doyle, and R.H. Green Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: direct rating versus point allocation J Market Res 37 2000 508 513
54. W. Edwards How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 7 1977 326 340
55. T.L. Saaty Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures J Math Psychol 15 1977 234 281
56. C. Bana e Costa, J.M. De Corte, and J.C. Vansnick On the mathematical foundation of MACBETH In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys 78th ed. 2005 Springer New York
57. P.E. Green, A.M. Krieger, and Y. Wind Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects Interfaces 31 Suppl 3 2001 S56 S73
58. M. Ryan, and K. Gerard Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 2003 55 64
59. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care (11th ed.). Springer, The Netherlands, 2007.
60. P. Hansen, and F. Ombler A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 15 2008 87 107
61. Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D. Practical value models. 2009. Available from: http://research.create.usc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=published-papers. [Accessed December 28, 2015].
62. H. Broekhuizen, C.G. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, J.A. van Til, and et al. A review and classification of approaches for dealing with uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare decisions Pharmacoeconomics 33 2015 445 455