Patients' preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 59-70

  Dolan, James G ^a   Boohaker, Emily ^b   Allison, Jeroan ^c   Imperiale, Thomas F ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process; colorectal cancer; prevention; screening; shared decision making

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALABAMA; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; INDIANA; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872326416     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12453502     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J. 2011 ; 61: 212-36
2. Henley SJ, King JB, German RR, Richardson LC, Plescia M. Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 ; 59: 1-25
3. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 ; 58: 130-60
4. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008 ; 149: 627-37
5. Lieberman DA. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 ; 361: 1179-87
6. Sung JJY, Lau JYW, Young GP, et al. Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2008 ; 57: 1166-76
7. Luxembourg: EU Bookshop ; 2010 :
8. Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, Taplin SH. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010 ; 2010: 38-57
9. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010 ; 152: 663-7
10. Belton V, Stewart TJ Boston: Kluwer Academic ; 2002 :
11. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M New York: Springer; ; 2005 :
12. Dolan JG, Bordley DR, Miller H. Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: patient and physician preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 ; 8: 525-9
13. Dolan JG. Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions?. Med Decis Making. 1995 ; 15: 76-80
14. Peralta-Carcelen M, Fargason CA, Coston D, Dolan JG. Preferences of pregnant women and physicians for 2 strategies for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 ; 151: 712-8
15. Dolan JG, Frisina S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Med Decis Making. 2002 ; 22: 125-39
16. van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, Ijzerman MJ. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 ; 89: 457-62
17. Facts on screening. Screen for life: National colorectal cancer action campaign. CDC cancer prevention and control. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/screenforlife/fs-detailed.htm. Accessed 5 January 2004.
18. Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K. Multiple Criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manage Sci. 2008 ; 54: 1336-49
19. Dolan J. Shared decision-making - transferring research into practice: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Patient Educ Counsel. 2008 ; 73: 418-25
20. Dolan JG, Isselhardt BJ, Cappuccio JD. The analytic hierarchy process in medical decision making: a tutorial. Med Decis Making. 1989 ; 9: 40-50
21. Forman EH, Gass SI. The analytic hierarchy process - an exposition. Operations Res. 2001 ; 49: 469-86
22. Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces. 1994 ; 24: 19-43
23. Whitaker R. Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process. Math Comput Model. 2007 ; 46: 840-59
24. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 ; 137: 132-41
25. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003 ; 124: 544-60
26. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997 ; 112: 594-642
27. Saaty TL Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications; ; 2001 :
28. Sato J. Comparison between multiple-choice and analytic hierarchy process: measuring human perception. Int Trans Oper Res. 2004 ; 11: 77-86
29. Katsumura Y, Yasunaga H, Imamura T, Ohe K, Oyama H. Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: analysis using the analytic hierarchy process. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 ; 8: 106
30. Saaty TL, Tran LT. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Comput Model. 2007 ; 46 (7-8). 962-75
31. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993 ; 25: 391-5
32. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 672-80
33. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 663-71
34. Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, Pearson B, Schroy PC. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 ; 16: 822-30
35. Shokar NK, Carlson CA, Weller SC. Informed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population. Ann Fam Med. 2010 ; 8: 141-50
36. Hawley ST, Volk RJ, Krishnamurthy P, Jibaja-Weiss M, Vernon SW, Kneuper S. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Med Care. 2008 ; 46 (9). S10-6 - S-6
37. Marshall D, McGregor SE, Currie G. Measuring preferences for colorectal cancer screening: what are the implications for moving forward?. Patient. 2010 ; 3: 79-89
38. Schroy PC, Emmons K, Peters E, et al. The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making. 2011 ; 31: 93-107
39. Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2008 ; 189: 194-207
40. Vaidya OS, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res. 2006 ; 169: 1-29
41. Wasil E, Golden B. Celebrating 25 years of AHP-based decision making. Comput Oper Res. 2003 ; 30: 1419-20
42. BrownleeSWennbergJEBarryMFisherESGoodmanDCByrumJPW. Improving patient decision-making in health care: a 2011 Dartmouth Atlas report highlighting Minnesota. [cited 14March2011]. Available from: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/ downloads/reports/Decision-making-report-022411.pdf
43. Ferrante JM, Balasubramanian BA, Hudson SV, Crabtree BF. Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery. Ann Fam Med. 2010 ; 8: 108-16