STAR - People-powered prioritization: A 21st-century solution to allocation headaches

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 965-975

  Airoldi, Mara ^a   Morton, Alec ^b   Smith, Jenifer A E ^c   Bevan, Gwyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness analysis; Decision aid; Deliberative approach; Local health planning; Priority setting; Resource allocation; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES;

EID: 84909641408     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14546376     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
2. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2005.
3. Williams A. Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. Br Med J. 1985;291:326-9.
4. Brouwer WBF, Culyer AJ, van Exel NJA, Rutten FFH. Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. J Health Econ. 2008;27:325-38.
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London (UK): NICE; 2008.
6. Bryan S, Williams I, McIver S. Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals. Health Econ. 2007;16: 179-93.
7. House of Commons Health Committee. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. First report of session 2007-08. London: The Stationary Office Limited; 2008.
8. Steinbrook R. Saying no isn't NICE - the travails of Britain's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1977-81.
9. Department of Health. Section 3: ITT and scope of work. In: Invitation to Tender for the Contracts to Undertake Technology Assessment Reviews (TARs) on Behalf of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). London: Department of Health; 2009.
10. Eddama O, Coast J. A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making. Health Policy. 2008;86:129-41.
11. Williams I, Bryan S. Understanding the limited impact of economic evaluation in health care resource allocation: a conceptual framework. Health Policy. 2007;80:135-43.
12. Oliver A. Prioritizing health care: is "health" always an appropriate maximand? Med Decis Making. 2004;24:272-80.
13. Mullen PM. Are numbers still killing people? And what is being done about it? Oper Res Health Care. Forthcoming.
14. Martin S, Rice N, Smith PC. Does health care spending improve health outcomes? Evidence from English programme budgeting data. J Health Econ. 2008;27:826-42.
15. Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D, Buxton M, Chalkidou K. Searching for cost effectiveness thresholds in the NHS. Health Policy. 2009;91:239-45.
16. Mitton C, Donaldson C. Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001;6:239-48.
17. Mitton C, Patten S, Waldner H, Donaldson C. Priority setting in health authorities: a novel approach to a historical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1653-63.
18. Peacock SJ, Richardson JRJ, Carter R, Edwards D. Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:897-910.
19. Peacock SJ, Mitton C, Bate A, McCoy B, Donaldson C. Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy. 2009;92:124-32.
20. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1976.
21. Mullen PM. Quantifying priorities in healthcare: transparency or illusion? Health Service Management Research. 2004;17:47-58.
22. Thokala P, Duenas A. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment. Value Health. 2012;15:1172-81.
23. Department of Health, Resource Allocation Team. Resource Allocation: Weighted Capitation Formula. 6th ed. London (UK): Department of Health; 2008.
24. Phillips LD, Bana e Costa C. Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann Oper Res. 2007;154:51-68.
25. Phillips LD. A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychol. 1984;56:29-48.
26. Smith J. Isle of Wight Public Health Annual Report 2008. Newport (UK): Isle of Wight NHS; 2008.
27. Isle of Wight NHS PCT. Isle of Wight NHS Primary Care Trust Annual Report 2007/08. Newport (UK): Isle of Wight NHS; 2008. 28. von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1986.
28. Parkin D, Devlin N. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis? Health Econ. 2006;15:653-64.
29. Goodwin P, Wright G. Chapter 13: Resource allocation and negotiation problems. In: Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2004. p 329-54.
30. Keeney RL, Winkler RL. Evaluating decision strategies for equity of public risks. Oper Res. 1985;33:955-70.
31. Morton A, Airoldi M. Incorporating Health Inequalities Considerations in PCT Priority Setting (LSEOR10.122). LSEOR Working Paper Series. London (UK): LSE; 2010.
32. Sandman L. A Good Death. On the Value of Death and Dying. Maidenhead (UK): Open University Press; 2005.
33. Towse A. Should NICE's threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? Yes. BMJ. 2009;338:268.
34. Mason H, Jones-Lee M, Donaldson C. Modelling the monetary value of a QALY: a new approach based on UK data. Health Econ. 2009;18:933-50.
35. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Social Value Judgements: Principles for the Development of NICE Guidance. London (UK): NICE; 2008.
36. Cookson R, McCabe C, Tsuchiya A. Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of rescue. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:540-4.