Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: Noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 642-650.e1

  Van Strijen, Marco J ^a   Grünhagen, Thijs ^b   Mauti, Maria ^b   Zähringer, Markus ^d   Gaines, Peter A ^e   Robinson, Graham J ^f   Railton, Nicholas J ^g   Van Overhagen, Hans ^c   Habraken, Jan ^a   Van Leersum, Marc ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c HAGA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d MARIENHOSPITAL STUTTGART   (Germany)

^e NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^g BROOMFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abbreviations BMI body mass index CI confidence interval DAP dose area product DSA digital subtraction angiography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETER; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGIST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION SCATTERING; AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; RADIATION DOSAGE; SCATTERING, RADIATION;

EID: 84928827719     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: 15357732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. M. Bhargavan Trends in the utilization of medical procedures that use ionizing radiation Health Phys 95 2008 612 627
2. F.A. Mettler Jr, M. Bhargavan, and K. Faulkner Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources - 1950-2007 Radiology 253 2009 520 531
3. K. Bacher, E. Bogaert, and R. Lapere Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization Circulation 111 2005 83 89
4. D.L. Miller, S. Balter, and P.E. Cole Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 2003 711 727
5. K.J. Strauss Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations Pediatr Radiol 36 Suppl 2 2006 126 135
6. S.G. Bryk, M.L. Censullo, and L.K. Wagner Endovascular and interventional procedures in obese patients: a review of procedural technique modifications and radiation management J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 2006 27 33
7. M.B. Pitton, R. Kloeckner, and J. Schneider Radiation exposure in vascular angiographic procedures J Vasc Interv Radiol 23 2012 1487 1495
8. E. Vano, N.J. Kleiman, and A. Duran Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel Radiat Res 174 2010 490 495
9. O. Ciraj-Bjelac, M.M. Rehani, and K.H. Sim Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 76 2010 826 834
10. A. Roguin, J. Goldstein, and O. Bar Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature EuroIntervention 7 2012 1081 1086
11. R.M. Sánchez, E. Vano, and J.M. Fernández Staff doses in interventional radiology: a national survey J Vasc Intervent Radiol 23 2012 1496 1501
12. A. Den Boer, P.J. de Feyter, and W.A. Hummel Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering Circulation 89 1994 2710 2714
13. M. Söderman, S. Holmin, and T. Andersson Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results Radiology 269 2013 553 560
14. J. Dobbins III Observer assessment J. Beutel, H.L. Kundel, R.L. Van Metter, Handbook of Medical Imaging: Physics and Psychophysics 2000 SPIE Press Bellingham, WA 161 222
15. Guidance for Industry: Developing Medical Imaging Drug and Biological Products. Design, analysis, and interpretation of clinical studies 2004 US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Rockville, MD
16. M. Burbelko, M. Augsten, M.O. Kalinowski, and J.T. Heverhagen Comparison of contrast-enhanced multi-station MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity arterial disease J Magn Reson Imaging 37 2013 1427 1435
17. E. Vano, J.M. Fernandez, and R. Sanchez Occupational dosimetry in real time. Benefits for interventional radiology Radiat Meas 46 2011 1262 1265
18. E. Vano, L. Gonzalez, and E. Guibelalde Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology Br J Radiol 71 1998 954 960
19. J.L. Fleiss Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions 2nd ed 1981 John Wiley & Sons New York
20. Gwet K. Kappa statistics is not satisfactory for assessing the extent of agreement between raters. Series: Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment. 2002;1:1-6. Available at: http://www.agreestat.com/research-papers/kappa-statistic-is-not-satisfactory.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2013.
21. B. Wiesinger, A. Stütz, and J. Schmehl Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products AJR Am J Roentgenol 198 2012 946 954
22. H.D. Nagel Comparison of performance characteristics of conventional and k-edge filters in general diagnostic radiology Phys Med Biol 34 1989 1269 1287
23. K.A. Fetterly Investigation of the practical aspects of an additional 0.1 mm copper x-ray spectral filter for cine acquisition mode imaging in a clinical care setting Health Phys 99 2010 624 630
24. B.A. Schueler, T.J. Vrieze, H. Bjarnason, and A.W. Stanson An investigation of operator exposure in interventional radiology Radiographics 26 2006 1533 1541
25. J. Racadio, K. Strauss, and T. Abruzzo Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model AJR Am J Roentgenol 203 2014 904 908
26. L.R. Dekker, P.H. van der Voort, and T.A. Simmers New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial Heart Rhythm 10 2013 1678 1682
27. M. Soderman, M. Mauti, and S. Boon Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients Neuroradiology 55 2013 1365 1372