Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 78, Issue 934, 2005, Pages 906-912

  Geijer, H ^a   Larzon, T ^a   Popek, R ^a   Beckman, K W ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTA GRAFT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; DOSIMETRY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHANTOM; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SIMULATION; SKIN INJURY; STENT; X RAY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; STENTS;

EID: 27744527721     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/72629938     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:843-8.
2. ICRP. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2000;30 (2).
3. ICRU. Phantoms and computational models in therapy, diagnosis and protection. ICRU Report 48. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1992;48.
4. Wall BF, Harrison RM, Spiers FW. Patient dosimetry techniques in diagnostic radiology. Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, Report No. 53. York: IPEM, 1988.
5. Thijssen MAO, Thijssen HOM, Merx JL, Lindeijer JM, Bijkerk KR. A definition of image quality: the image quality figure. In: Moores BM, Wall BF, Eriskat H, Schibilla H, editors. BIR Report 20: Optimization of image quality and patient exposure in diagnostic radiology. London: The British Institute of Radiology; 1989: 29-34.
6. Eurostar. Stent-graft techniques for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. European collaborators group. Case record form. 2000.
7. Impactscan.org [homepage on the Internet]. London: ImPACT group [updated 07/05/2003, cited 2003 Sep 12]. Available from http://www.impactscan.org.
8. Jones DG, Shrimpton PC. Normalised organ doses from X-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB SR-250. Chilton: National Radiological Protection Board, 1993.
9. Geijer H, Beckman K-W, Andersson T, Persliden J. Radiation dose optimization in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). II. Clinical evaluation. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2813-9.
10. Bernardi G, Padovani R, Morocutti G, Vañó E, Malisan MR, Rinuncini M, et al. Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51: 1-9.
11. Fransson SG, Persliden J. Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention. Acta Radiol 2000;41:142-4.
12. Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T, Heller S, Wain RA, Suggs WD, et al. Does the endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms pose a radiation safety hazard to vascular surgeons? J Vasc Surg 2000;32:704-10.
13. Balzer JO, Doss M, Thalhammer A, Fieguth HG, Moritz A, Vogl TJ. Urgent thoracic aortal dissection and aneurysm: treatment with stent-graft implantation in an angiographic suite. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2249-58.
14. Neofotistou V, Vañó E, Padovani R, Kotre J, Dowling A, Toivonen M, et al. Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2259-63.
15. Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, Lu HT, Schueler BA, Geisinger M, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:711-27.
16. Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, Lu HT, Berenstein A, Albert R, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:977-90.
17. Ramalanjaona GR, Pearce WH, Ritenour ER. Radiation exposure risk to the surgeon during operative angiography. J Vasc Surg 1986;4:224-8.
18. den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Hummel WA, Keane D, Roelandt JRTC. Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel X-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering. Circulation 1994;89:2710-4.
19. Wagner LK, Archer BR, Cohen AM. Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:25-33.
20. ICRP. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1991;21(1-3).
21. Laheij RJ, Buth J, Harris PL, Moll FL, Stelter WJ, Verhoeven EL. Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR). Br J Surg 2000;87:1666-73.
22. van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJF, Harris PL, Buth J, and for the Eurostar collaborators. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;27:128-37.