Students' and teachers' orientation to learning and performing in music conservatoire lesson interactions

Psychology of Music

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 202-218

  Ivaldi, Antonia ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

conservatoire lessons; conversation analysis; embodied; multimodal; pedagogy; social interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957555801     PISSN: 03057356     EISSN: 17413087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0305735614562226     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Beach W. A., (1993). Transitional regularities for 'casual' 'okay' usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19 (4), 325-352.
2. Burwell K., (2006). On musicians and singers. An investigation of different approaches taken by vocal and instrumental teachers in higher education. Music Education Research, 8 (3), 331-347.
3. Cekaite A., (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text and Talk, 30 (1), 1-25.
4. Clark H. H., Fox Tree J. E., (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
5. Clark H. H., Gerrig R. J., (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66 (4), 764-805.
6. Forrester M., (2010). Emerging musicality during the pre-school years: A case study of one child. Psychology of Music, 38 (2), 131-158.
7. Gardner R., (1997). The conversation object Mm: A weak and variable acknowledging token. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30 (2), 131-156.
8. Gaunt H., (2008). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36 (2), 215-245.
9. Gaunt H., (2010). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 38 (2), 178-208.
10. Goodwin C., (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50 (3-4), 272-302.
11. Guthrie A. M., (1997). On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academic advising sessions. Pragmatics, 7 (3), 397-415.
12. Hellermann J., (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32, 79-104.
13. Hellermann J., (2005). Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (1), 105-130.
14. Heritage J., (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson J. M., Heritage J., (Eds.). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp 299-345). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Heritage J., (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27, 291-334.
16. Hutchby I., Wooffitt R., (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
17. Ivaldi A., (in press). The social construction of value judgements in music pedagogical interaction. In Dogantan-Dack M., Gritten A., (Eds.), Interpreting music, displaying values. Bloomington, Indianna: Indiana University Press.
18. Jefferson G., (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner G., (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
19. Karlsson J., Juslin P.N., (2008). Musical expression: An observational study of instrumental teaching. Psychology of Music, 36 (3), 309-334.
20. Keevallik L., (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43 (4), 401-426.
21. Kent A., (2012). Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives. Discourse Studies, 14 (6), 711-730.
22. Koole T., (2012). Teacher evaluations-Assessing 'knowing', 'understanding', and 'doing'. In Rasmussen G., Brouwer C. E., Day D., (Eds.), Evaluating cognitive competencies in interaction (pp. 43-66). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
23. MacBeth D., (2011). Understanding understanding as an instructional manner. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 438-451.
24. Nishizaka A., (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39 (2), 119-154.
25. Othman Z., (2010). The use of okay, right and yeah in academic lectures by native speaker lecturers: Their 'anticipated' and 'real' meanings. Discourse Studies, 12 (5), 665-681.
26. Pike C., (2010). Intersubjectivity and misunderstanding in adult-child learning conversations. In Gardner H., Forrester M., (Eds.). Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 163-181). London, UK: Wiley.
27. Presland C., (2005). Conservatoire student and instrumental professor: The student perspective on a complex relationship. British Journal of Music Education, 22 (3), 237-248.
28. Puchta C., Potter J., (2004). Focus group practice. London, UK: SAGE.
29. Schegloff E. A., (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Stivers T., (2013). Sequence organization. In Sidnell J., Stivers T., (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 191-209). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
31. Szczepek Reed B., Reed D., Haddon E., (2013). NOW or NOT NOW: Coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classes. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46 (1), 22-46.
32. Tolins J., (2013). Assessment and direction through nonlexical vocalizations in music instruction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46 (1), 47-64.
33. Vehviläinen S., (2009). Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 185-201.
34. Weeks P. A. D., (1996). A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29 (3), 247-290.
35. Zhang Waring H., (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (4), 577-594.