A Computational Evaluation of Sentence Processing Deficits in Aphasia

Cognitive Science

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 5-50

  Patil, Umesh ^a   Hanne, Sandra ^a   Burchert, Frank ^a   De Bleser, Ria ^a   Vasishth, Shravan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Cognitive architecture; Computational modeling; Eye movements; Individual differences; Non canonical sentences; Sentence picture matching

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ATAXIC APHASIA; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPREHENSION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

APHASIA; APHASIA, BROCA; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMPREHENSION; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84956716756     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: 15516709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12250     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Aho, A. V., & Ullman, J. D. (1972). The theory of parsing, translation and compiling volume I: Parsing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419-439.
3. Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247-264.
4. Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 502-518.
5. Anderson, J. R., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036-1050.
6. Avrutin, S. (2006). Weak syntax. In Y. Grodzinsky & K. Amunts (Eds.), Broca's region (pp. 49-62). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1986). A final brief in the case against agrammatism: The role of theory in the selection of data. Cognition, 24(3), 277-282.
8. Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 748-769.
9. Beretta, A., & Munn, A. (1998). Double-agents and trace-deletion in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 65(3), 404-421.
10. Blumstein, S. E., Byma, G., Kurowski, K., Hourihan, J., Brown, T., & Hutchinson, A. (1998). On-line processing of filler-gap construction in aphasia. Brain Language, 61(2), 149-168.
11. Boston, M. F., Hale, J. T., Vasishth, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(3), 301-349.
12. Burchert, F., & De Bleser, R. (2004). Passives in agrammatic sentence comprehension: A German study. Aphasiology, 18(1), 29-45.
13. Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Sonntag, K. (2003). Does morphology make the difference? Agrammatic sentence comprehension in german. Brain and Language, 87(2), 323-342.
14. Burchert, F., Hanne, S., & Vasishth, S. (2013). Sentence comprehension disorders in aphasia: The concept of chance performance revisited. Aphasiology, 27, 112-125.
15. Burkhardt, P., Mercedes Piñango, M., & Wong, K. (2003). The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity. Brain and Language, 86(1), 9-22.
16. Caplan, D. (2001). The measurement of chance performance in aphasia, with specific reference to the comprehension of semantically reversible passive sentences: A note on issues raised by Caramazza, Capitani, Rey, and Berndt (2001) and Drai, Grodzinsky, and Zurif (2001). Brain and Language, 76(2), 193-201.
17. Caplan, D. (2009). The neural basis of syntactic processing. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 805-816). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1988). Disorders of syntactic comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1995). Aphasic disorders of syntactic comprehension and working memory capacity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(6), 637-649.
20. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2003). On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: Studies with auditory moving window presentation. Brain and Language, 84(2), 222-249.
21. Caplan, D., Baker, C., & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21(2), 117-175.
22. Caplan, D., Waters, G., & Hildebrandt, N. (1997). Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40), 542-555.
23. Caplan, D., Waters, G., Dede, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language, 101(2), 103-150.
24. Caplan, D., Michaud, J., & Hufford, R. (2013). Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits. Brain and Language, 127(1), 21-33.
25. Caramazza, A., & McCloskey, M. (1988). The case for single-patient studies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(5), 517-527.
26. Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3(4), 572-582.
27. Caramazza, A., Capasso, R., Capitani, E., & Miceli, G. (2005). Patterns of comprehension performance in agrammatic Broca's aphasia: A test of the Trace Deletion Hypothesis. Brain and Language, 94(1), 43-53.
28. Cho, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2010). What goes wrong during passive sentence production in agrammatic aphasia: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology, 24(12), 1576-1592.
29. Chomsky, N. (1970). Readings in english transformational grammar. In R. Jacobs, & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Remarks on nominalization (pp. 184-221). Waltham: Ginn.
30. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Chomsky, N. (1986a). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Chomsky, N. (1986b). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origins, and use. New York, NY, Praeger.
33. Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2010). Binding in agrammatic aphasia: Processing to comprehension. Aphasiology, 24(5), 551-579.
34. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2001). Finite models of infinite language: A connectionist approach to recursion. In M. H. Christiansen, & N. Chater (Eds.), Connectionist psycholinguistics (pp. 138-176). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
35. Clark, D. G. (2012). Storage costs and heuristics interact to produce patterns of aphasic sentence comprehension performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-19.
36. Coltheart, M. (2006). Acquired dyslexias and the computational modelling of reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 96-109.
37. Crescentini, C., & Stocco, A. (2005). Agrammatism as a failure in the lexical activation process. In B. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Cunnings, I., & Felser, C. (2013). The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1-2), 188-219.
39. Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453-459.
40. Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Hogan, E. M. (2001). Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(5-6), 507-534.
41. De Bleser, R., Schwarz, W., & Burchert, F. (2006). Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses: The final word? Brain and Language, 96(2), 143-146.
42. Dell, G. S., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Introduction to special issue on computational modelling in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(2), 131-135.
43. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801-838.
44. Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2006). Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Brain and Language, 99(1-2), 63-64.
45. Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2009). Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(6), 563-583.
46. Dickey, M. W., Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2007). Real-time comprehension of wh- movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language, 100(1), 1-22.
47. Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 20.) Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
48. Dilkina, K., McClelland, J. L., & Plaut, D. C. (2008). A single-system account of semantic and lexical deficits in five semantic dementia patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(2), 136-164.
49. Dillon, B. (2011). Structured access in sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maryland.
50. Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 85-103.
51. Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R. D., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004). Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, 92(1-2), 145-177.
52. Dubey, A., Keller, F., & Sturt, P. (2008). A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism. Cognition, 109(3), 326-344.
53. Edwards, S., & Varlokosta, S. (2007). Pronominal and anaphoric reference in agrammatism. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(6), 423-444.
54. Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2014). Predicting individual differences in underspecification: An integrated model of good-enough processing. Poster presented at CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
55. Engelmann, F., Vasishth, S., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2013). A framework for modeling the interaction of syntactic processing and eye movement control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(3), 452-474.
56. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164-203.
57. Ferrill, M., Love, T., Walenski, M., & Shapiro, L. P. (2012). The time-course of lexical activation during sentence comprehension in people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 179-189.
58. Frank, S. L., Trompenaars, T., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Cross-linguistic differences in processing double-embedded relative clauses: Working-memory constraints or language statistics? Cognitive Science.
59. Gavarro, A., & Romeu, J. (2010). Agentive versus non-agentive passives in catalan agrammatism. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 200-201.
60. Gibson, E. (2000). Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (95-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Gigley, H. M. (1986). Studies in artificial aphasia: Experiments in processing change. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 22(1), 43-50.
62. Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50(1), 27-51.
63. Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 1-71.
64. Grodzinsky, Y. (2006). The language faculty, Broca's region, and the mirror system. Cortex, 42(4), 464-468.
65. Grodzinsky, Y., & Finkel, L. (1998). The neurology of empty categories: Aphasics' failure to detect ungrammaticality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(2), 281-292.
66. Grodzinsky, Y., & Santi, A. (2008). The battle for Broca's region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 474-480.
67. Grodzinsky, Y., Wexler, K., Chien, Y., Marakovitz, S., & Solomon, J. (1993). The breakdown of binding relations. Brain and Language, 45(3), 396-422.
68. Grodzinsky, Y., Piñango, M. M., Zurif, E., & Drai, D. (1999). The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 67(2), 134-147.
69. Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. (1991). A computer model of the temporal course of agrammatic sentence understanding: The effects of variation in severity and sentence complexity. Cognitive Science, 15(1), 49-87.
70. Haarmann, H. J., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1997). Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A computational approach. Brain and Language, 59(1), 76-120.
71. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Swaab, T. Y. (1996). Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain, 119(2), 627-649.
72. Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 159-166). Pittsburgh, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
73. Hanne, S., Sekerina, I. A., Vasishth, S., Burchert, F., & De Bleser, R. (2011). Chance in agrammatic sentence comprehension: What does it really mean? Evidence from eye movements of german agrammatic aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 25(2), 221-244.
74. Hanne, S., Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Vasishth, S. (2014). Sentence comprehension and morphological cues in aphasia: What eye-tracking reveals about integration and prediction. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 34, 83-111.
75. Hickok, G., & Avrutin, S. (1995). Representation, referentiality, and processing in agrammatic comprehension: Two case studies. Brain and Language, 50(1), 10-26.
76. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23-B32.
77. Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460-482.
78. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329-354.
79. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.
80. Kempen, G., & Vosse, T. (1989). Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing. Connection Science, 1(3), 273-290.
81. Kiran, S., Grasemann, U., Sandberg, C., & Miikkulainen, R. (2012). A computational account of bilingual aphasia rehabilitation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(02), 325-342.
82. Kolk, H. H., & Van Grunsven, M. M. (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(4), 347-384.
83. Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85(2), 211-258.
84. Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2011a). Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 985-1021.
85. Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2011b). Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology, 25(6-7), 813-825.
86. Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126-1177.
87. Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375-419.
88. Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447-454.
89. Logačev, P., & Vasishth, S. (2015). A multiple-channel model of task-dependent ambiguity resolution in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science.
90. Logačev, P., & Vasishth, S. (2014). What is underspecification? (Manuscript submitted for publication)
91. Love, T., Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. B. (2001). Aphasia and the time-course of processing long-distance dependencies. Brain and Language, 79, 169-170.
92. Love, T., Swinney, D., Walenski, M., & Zurif, E. (2008). How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 107(3), 203-219.
93. Martin, R. C. (2006). The neuropsychology of sentence processing: Where do we stand? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 74-95.
94. Matzke, M., Mai, H., Nager, W., Rüsseler, J., & Münte, T. (2002). The costs of freedom: An ERP-study of non-canonical sentences. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 844-852.
95. Mauner, G., Fromkin, V. A., & Cornell, T. L. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45(3), 340-370.
96. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The trace model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-86.
97. Meinunger, A. (2000). Syntactic aspects of topic and comment (Vol. 38). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
98. Meyer, A. M., Mack, J. E., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25(1), 31-43.
99. Mirman, D., Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain and Language, 117(2), 53-68.
100. Mitchum, C. C., & Berndt, R. (2008). Comprehension and production of sentences. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (5th ed., pp. 632-653). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
101. Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(6), 671-717.
102. Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98(3), 223-243.
103. Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., Coltheart, M., Saunders, S., & Tree, J. J. (2008). Computational modelling of phonological dyslexia: How does the drc model fare? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(2), 165-193.
104. Nievergelt, J. (2000). Exhaustive search, combinatorial optimization and enumeration: Exploring the potential of raw computing power. In V. Hlaváč, K. G. Jeffery, & J. Wiedermann (Eds.), Sofsem 2000 - Theory and Practice of Informatics (pp. 18-35). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
105. Patil, U., Vasishth, S., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Compound effect of probabilistic disambiguation and memory retrievals on sentence processing: Evidence from an eye-tracking corpus. In A. Howes, D. Peebles, & R. Cooper (Eds.), 9th international conference on cognitive modeling - ICCM2009 (100-283). Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
106. Patil, U., Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. L. (2011). Early retrieval interference in syntax-guided antecedent search. Talk presented at CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
107. Patil, U., Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. L. (2015). Retrieval interference in syntactic processing: The case of reflexive binding in English. (Manuscript in preparation)
108. Penke, M., & Westermann, G. (2006). Broca's area and inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca's aphasia and computer modeling. Cortex, 42(4), 563-576.
109. Plaut, D. C. (2002). Graded modality-specific specialisation in semantics: A computational account of optic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(7), 603-639.
110. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
111. Prather, P. A., Zurif, E., Love, T., & Brownell, H. (1997). Speed of lexical activation in nonfluent Broca's aphasia and fluent Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 59(3), 391-411.
112. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. (ISBN 3-900051-07-0)
113. Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587-637.
114. Rogers, T. T., Ralph, M. A. L., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205-235.
115. Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: I. comprehension. Brain and Language, 10(2), 249-262.
116. Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C., Saffran, E. M., & Pate, D. S. (1987). Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(2), 85-113.
117. Swaab, T. Y., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1997). Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: Event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 39-66.
118. Swinney, D., Zurif, E. B., Prather, P., & Love, T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing operations underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 174-184.
119. Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 355-370.
120. Thompson, C. K., & Choy, J. (2009). Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(3), 255-283.
121. Thompson, C. K., Dickey, M. W., & Choy, J. J. (2004). Complexity in the comprehension of wh-movement structures in agrammatic Broca's aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Brain and Language, 91(1), 124-125.
122. Thompson, C. K., Choy, J. J., Holland, A., & Cole, R. (2010). Sentactics ®: Computer-automated treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology, 24(10), 1242-1266.
123. Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., Clifton, J. C., & Clifton, C. (1998). Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 558-592.
124. Van Dyke, J. A., & Lewis, R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 285-316.
125. Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. L. (2006a). Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects. Language, 82(4), 767-794.
126. Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. L. (2006b). Human language processing: Symbolic models. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 410-419). Oxford: Elsevier.
127. Vasishth, S., Brüssow, S., Lewis, R. L., & Drenhaus, H. (2008). Processing polarity: How the ungrammatical intrudes on the grammatical. Cognitive Science, 32(4), 685-712.
128. Vasishth, S., Suckow, K., Lewis, R. L., & Kern, S. (2010). Short-term forgetting in sentence comprehension: Crosslinguistic evidence from head-final structures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(4), 533-567.
129. Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105-143.
130. Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206-237.
131. Woollams, A. M., Ralph, M. A. L., Plaut, D. C., & Patterson, K. (2007). Sd-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia. Psychological Review, 114(2), 316-339.
132. Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2008). Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 592-612.
133. Zurif, E. B., Swinney, D., Prather, P., & Love, T. (1994). Functional localization in the brain with respect to syntactic processing. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 23, 487-497.