Double-agents and trace-deletion in agrammatism

Brain and Language

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 404-421

  Beretta, Alan ^a   Munn, Alan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MENTAL TASK;

EID: 0032401861     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.1997     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beretta A., Harford C., Patterson J., Piñango M. The derivation of postverbal subjects: Evidence from agrammatic aphasia. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 14:1996;725-748.
2. Bever T. The cognitive basis of linguistic structures. Cognition, and the development of language. 1970;New York, Wiley.
3. Caplan D., Futter C. Assignment of thematic roles by an agrammatic aphasic patient. Brain and Language. 27:1986;117-135.
4. Grodzinsky Y. Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language. 27:1986;135-159.
5. Grodzinsky Y. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge.
6. Grodzinsky Y. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 50:1995;27-51.
7. Grodzinsky Y., Pierce A., Marakovitz S. Neuropsychological reasons for a transformational analysis of verbal passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 9:1991;431-453.
8. Hickok G., Avrutin S. Representation, referentiality, and processing in agrammatic comprehension: Two case studies. Brain and Language. 50:1995;10-26.
9. Hickok G., Avrutin S. Comprehension ofwh. Brain and Language. 51:1996;314-327.
10. Hickok G., Zurif E., Canseco-Gonzales E. Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 45:1993;371-395.
11. Kitagawa, Y. 1986, Subjects in Japanese and English.
12. Koopman, H. Sportiche, D. 1988, Subjects.
13. Levin B., Rappaport M. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry. 17:1986;623-661.
14. Linebarger M. Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain and Language. 50:1995;52-91.
15. Linebarger M., Schwartz M., Saffran E. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition. 13:1983;361-393.
16. Mauner G. Examining the empirical and linguistic bases of current theories of agrammatism. Brain and Language. 50:1995;339-368.
17. Mauner G., Fromkin V., Cornell T. Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language. 45:1993;340-370.
18. McCloskey, J. Subjecthood and the subject position, L. Haegemann, Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.
19. Schwartz M., Saffran E., Marin O. The word-order problem in agrammatism: 1. Comprehension. Brain and Language. 10:1980;249-262.